• Trump's Environmental Destruction

    From Jeremy H. Denisovan@1:229/2 to All on Thursday, October 05, 2017 17:51:36
    From: david.j.worrell@gmail.com

    After basically converting the Environmental Protection Agency into
    something more like the Environmental Destruction Agency (or maybe
    the Environmental Sales Agency), it's almost hard to keep track of
    all the terrible things the Trump administration is doing.

    I'm going to list them, courtesy of "the failing New York Times".

    To date, the Trump administration has sought to reverse
    over 50 environmental rules...

    24 rules have been overturned
    17 rollbacks are in progress
    7 rollbacks are in limbo
    5 rules were undone then reinstated by legal challenge

    Regulations have often been reversed as a direct response to
    petitions from oil, coal and gas companies and industry groups.
    Trump is doing practically anything big corporations want,
    no matter how bad those things may be for land, water, and air.

    Scott Pruitt, the head of the Environmental Protection Agency,
    has met almost daily with industry executives and lobbyists.
    (As Oklahoma’s attorney general, Mr. Pruitt sued the agency he now
    oversees more than a dozen times to try to block Obama-era rules.)
    The E.P.A. was involved in one-third of these policy reversals..

    So what are all these rules Trump is hellishly busy destroying?

    ***

    Here's the first HALF:

    1. Revoked Obama-era flood standards for federal infrastructure
    projects. This Obama-era rule, revoked by Mr. Trump in August,
    required that federal agencies protect new infrastructure projects
    by building to higher flood standards. Building trade groups and
    many Republican lawmakers opposed it as costly and burdensome.

    (Sure, we probably won't have bad floods any more, right?)

    2. Rejected a proposed ban on a potentially harmful insecticide.
    Dow Agrosciences, which sells the insecticide chlorpyrifos,
    opposed a risk analysis by the Obama-era E.P.A. that found the
    compound posed a risk to fetal brain and nervous system development.
    Mr. Pruitt rejected the E.P.A.'s analysis, arguing the chemical
    needed further study.

    (Yeah, let's use more insecticides that damage kids' brains.)

    3. Lifted a freeze on new coal leases on public lands.
    Coal companies weren't thrilled about the Obama administration's
    three-year freeze pending an environmental review. Mr. Zinke,
    the interior secretary, revoked the freeze and review in March.
    He appointed members to a new advisory committee on coal royalties
    in September.

    (Sure, let's open up more coal leases on PUBLIC lands.
    The general public is so supportive of more coal usage. Not.)

    4. Canceled a requirement for oil and gas companies to report
    methane emissions. In March, Republican officials from 11 states
    wrote a letter to Mr. Pruitt, saying the rule added costs and
    paperwork for oil and gas companies. The next day, Mr. Pruitt
    revoked the rule.

    (They don't even have to report methane emissions now. Do you
    'spose that might create a RISE in methane emissions?)

    5. Revoked a rule that prevented coal companies from dumping mining
    debris into local streams. The coal industry said the rule was
    overly burdensome, calling it part of a “war on coal.” In February, Congress passed a bill revoking the rule, which Mr. Trump signed
    into law.

    (Yeah, let coal companies dump mining debris into our streams.)

    6. Approved the Keystone XL pipeline.
    Republicans, along with oil, gas and steel industry groups,
    opposed Mr. Obama's decision to block the pipeline, arguing that
    the project would create jobs and support North American energy
    independence. After the pipeline company reapplied for a permit,
    the Trump administration approved it.

    (After the construction is over, this pipeline will create less
    than 50 new permanent jobs, according to Factcheck.org.)

    7. Approved the Dakota Access pipeline.
    Republicans criticized Mr. Obama for delaying construction after
    protests led by the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe. Mr. Trump ordered
    an expedited review of the pipeline, and the Army approved it.
    Crude oil began flowing on June 1, but a federal judge later
    ordered a new environmental review.

    [Oops. Stopped again by a federal judge. Hey, I know, why don't
    you just replace that judge with yet another unqualified stooge?]

    8. Prohibited funding third-party projects through federal lawsuit
    settlements, which could include environmental programs.
    Companies settling lawsuits with the federal government have
    sometimes paid for third-party projects, like when Volkswagen put
    $2.7 billion toward pollution-fighting programs after its emissions
    cheating scandal. The Justice Department has now prohibited such
    payments, which some conservatives have called “slush funds.”

    [We don't want any money going to no goddamn environmental programs,
    not no way no how.]

    9. Repealed a ban on offshore oil and gas drilling in the Atlantic
    and Arctic oceans. Lobbyists for the oil industry were opposed
    to Mr. Obama's use of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to
    permanently ban offshore drilling along parts of the Atlantic coast
    and much of the ocean around Alaska. Mr. Trump repealed the policy
    in an April executive order and instructed his interior secretary,
    Mr. Zinke, to review the locations made available for offshore drilling.

    [Full steam ahead on offshore drilling. Who cares what happens
    to the earth as a whole. This is all about more money for US.]

    10. Proposed the use of seismic air guns for gas and oil exploration
    in the Atlantic. Following a executive order in April known as the America-First Offshore Energy Strategy, the Trump administration
    began an application process to allow five oil and gas companies to
    survey the Atlantic using seismic air guns, which fire loud blasts
    that can harm whales, fish and turtles. The Obama administration had
    previously denied such permits.

    [C'mon, they're whales and turtles. This is more money and oil for US!]

    11. Revoked a 2016 order protecting the northern Bering Sea region
    in Alaska. Mr. Trump revoked Mr. Obama’s 2016 order protecting the
    Bering Sea and Bering Strait by conserving biodiversity, engaging
    Alaska Native tribes and building a sustainable economy in the Arctic,
    which is vulnerable to climate change.

    [Biodiversity? Sustainable economy? Wtf? The Arctic is warming twice
    as fast as the rest of the earth...]

    12. Repealed an Obama-era rule regulating royalties for oil, gas
    and coal. Lobbyists for the fossil fuel industry opposed 2016
    Interior Department regulations meant to ensure fair royalties
    were paid to the government for oil, gas and coal extracted from
    federal or tribal land. In August, the Trump administration
    rescinded the rule, saying it caused “confusion and uncertainty”
    for energy companies.

    [Just another giveaway to the oil companies, plain and simple.]

    13. Withdrew guidance for federal agencies to include greenhouse
    gas emissions in environmental reviews. Republicans in Congress
    opposed the guidelines, which advised federal agencies to account
    for possible climate effects in environmental impact reviews.
    They argued that the government lacked the authority to make such recommendations, and that the new rules would slow down permitting.

    [Well see, if you're planning to get rid of most of your environment
    scientists anyway, how the hell will you do this? And they act
    like climate change is some kind of hoax, so... obviously.]

    14. Relaxed the environmental review process for federal
    infrastructure projects. Oil and gas industry leaders said the
    permit-issuing process for new infrastructure projects was costly
    and cumbersome. In an August executive order, Mr. Trump announced
    a policy he said would streamline the process for pipelines, bridges,
    power lines and other federal projects. The order put a single
    federal agency in charge of navigating environmental reviews,
    instituted a 90-day timeline for permit authorization decisions
    and set a goal of completing the full process in two years.

    [Environmental issues? Fuck that. Just get it all done faster.
    We're not raping the land nearly fast enough these days.]

    15. Announced intent to stop payments to the Green Climate Fund.
    Mr. Trump said he would cancel payments to the fund, a United
    Nations program that helps developing countries reduce emissions
    and adapt to climate change. Mr. Obama had pledged $3 billion,
    $1 billion of which Congress has already paid out over the
    opposition of some Republicans.

    [Did we agree to help with that? Psych! We don't care.
    We don't keep our promises either.]

    16. Dropped proposed restrictions on mining in Bristol Bay, Alaska.
    A Canadian company sued the E.P.A. over an Obama-era plan to
    restrict mining in Bristol Bay, an important salmon fishery.
    The Trump administration settled the suit and allowed the company
    to apply for permits to build a large gold and copper mine in the
    area. Alaska Republicans, including Senator Lisa Murkowski,
    supported the mine.

    [That's more gold for Trump bedrooms and shit. Who cares about fish?]

    17. Removed the Yellowstone grizzly bear from the endangered list.
    Noting that the species population had “rebounded from as few as
    136 bears in 1975 to an estimated 700 today,” the Interior Department delisted the Yellowstone grizzly. Delisting the bears was first
    formally proposed by the Obama administration in March 2016.

    [Does 700 seem like a lot? Too bad there's not ten million
    of them regularly eating from amongst the 8 billion humans.
    Then maybe Trump's about to kill off billions of those too?]

    18. Overturned a ban on the hunting of predators in Alaskan
    wildlife refuges. Alaskan politicians opposed the law, which
    prevented hunters from shooting wolves and grizzly bears on
    wildlife refuges, arguing that the state has authority over
    those lands. Congress passed a bill revoking the rule,
    which Mr. Trump signed into law.

    [Hey Bungalow Bill, little Donny Jr. wants to go hunting.]

    19. Withdrew proposed limits on endangered marine mammals caught
    by fishing nets on the West Coast. Under Mr. Trump, the National
    Marine Fisheries Service withdrew the proposed rule, noting high
    costs to the fishing industry and arguing that sufficient
    protections were already in place.

    [ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r5MVC-29FeI ]

    20. Stopped discouraging the sale of plastic water bottles in
    national parks. The National Park Service had urged parks to reduce
    or eliminate the sale of disposable plastic water bottles in favor
    of filling stations and reusable bottles. The International Bottled
    Water Association called the action unjustified.

    [Gotta keep using 50 billion plastic bottles a year. Right? ]

    21. Rescinded an Obama-era order to consider climate change in
    managing natural resources in national parks. The 2016 policy,
    which called for scientific park management, among other objectives,
    was contested by Republicans. In August, the National Park Service
    said they rescinded the policy in order to eliminate confusion among
    the public and National Parks Service employees regarding the Trump administration’s “new vision” for America’s parks.

    [New vision? If it involved "scientific", or "Obama" or "climate"
    then it's gone, no matter how much sense it may have made.]

    22. Directed agencies to stop using an Obama-era calculation of
    the “social cost of carbon”. As part of an expansive March 2017
    executive order, Mr. Trump directed agencies to stop using an
    Obama-era calculation that helped rulemakers monetize the costs
    of carbon emissions and instead base their estimates on a 2003
    cost-benefit analysis. Mr. Trump also disbanded the working group
    that created estimates for the social cost of carbon.

    [Just more stupid-ass climate change denial. Reverting to the past,
    to ensure that we may not even have a decent future.]

    23. Revoked an update to the Bureau of Land Management's public
    land use planning process. Republicans and fossil fuel industry
    groups opposed the updated planning rule for public lands,
    arguing that it gave the federal government too much power at
    the expense of local and business interests. Congress passed a
    bill revoking the rule, which Mr. Trump signed into law.

    [It's PUBLIC land, but let's give more of it to business interests,
    and especially to the ever-present... fossil fuel groups. ]

    24. Removed copper filter cake, an electronics manufacturing
    byproduct, from the “hazardous waste” list. Samsung petitioned the
    E.P.A. to delist the waste product, which is produced during
    electroplating at its Texas semiconductor facility.
    The E.P.A. granted the petition after a public comment period.

    [Naw, that stuff's not hazardous. Is it? Dump it in the landfill;
    it'll probably be okay. Who can be concerned about trivia like that
    with all this other awful shit going down? All right, I admit this
    one may be okay, and perhaps a few others. But MOST of them are...
    terribly short sighted pro-business crap, which seems to be the
    only way Republicans are even capable of thinking these days.
    The real irony is that ultimately it's not truly pro-business,
    for the businesses of the future are inevitably more sustainable.]

    ***

    (Half-time. To be continued. The worst HALF is yet to come...)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)
  • From slider@1:229/2 to david.j.worrell@gmail.com on Friday, October 06, 2017 18:22:43
    From: slider@nanashram.com

    On Fri, 06 Oct 2017 16:25:08 +0100, Jeremy H. Denisovan <david.j.worrell@gmail.com> wrote:

    Don't ever let anyone tell you voting doesn't matter because politicians never do anything anyway. Here are dozens of examples of the things politicians do.

    ### - you got quite peeved one time when i suggested 'getting used to it'
    when yet 'another' right-wing government took office? plus i didn't
    actually mean anything by that except the mild sarcasm that such public spending 'cuts' are basically standard with & from ANY right wing administration!

    that consequently, the working-man is always slightly (ever so slightly
    only tho') better-off under a left-wing administration due to typical 'increases' in public spending, the opposite 'always' applying under the
    right wing wherein public spending is always reduced to, erm, 'save money' (hah! yeah but at who's expense??)

    and yes, *whatever's* imposed by either wing, they're always opposed at
    every step by the opposite wing, even to involving law cases/challenges whatever, whatever, but which, in the final analysis, always but always
    results in actual cuts to public spending in real terms whenever a
    right-wing party rules, and increases whenever the left manages things...
    (and 'that's' what i meant by 'get used to it' when trump got in and
    started slashing the public purse strings while lining the pockets of the wealthy, that it's always to be expected under them... nothing else)

    to prove/qualify this, it'd be quite interesting to see a similar list (as
    say the above) for the 'last' right-wing administration too for
    comparison? coz you can bet your bottom dollar public spending went down
    that time too? and rose again under obama...

    (basically the RW always rob the country blind to line their own
    pockets/secure themselves, and the left then do something to tilt it all
    back the other way again whenever the public become so stressed by
    austerity that they again vote en-mass for the left when the 'lies' of the right-wing become glaringly obvious... and then, just when the damage is
    almost repaired by the left; who should 'trick' their way right back in
    again and start robbing all & sundry all over again?? it never ends! and
    this basically because no one 'actually' ever really understands exactly
    WHAT they're voting for and/or WHY! (not really) else the right-wing would 'never again' get back in! period! an educated majority (of working class) would ALWAYS vote left + the right-wing is a 'minority' group so they'd
    always lose! that is unless they can somehow whittle down the lefts voters enough to even be ABLE to compete with them! plus the lengths they'll
    often go to TO reduce the lefts votes is literally astounding! often pure
    lies! - AND it happens every time!)

    the 'ultimate' solution therefore only being the education of the working man/class (the 80% majority after all...) who would then get to
    know/realise just WHY they HAVE to vote for the left every time without
    fail! that it ISN'T ever a personality contest! that they're perforce
    always better-off under the left no matter WHO is the figurehead!

    (thing is, you were so 'pissed' the last time we went over this (and my 'get-used' to it remark/sarcasm, which wasn't actually directed personally
    at you...) that i don't think you really took it all in?)

    and would, for example, probably make for quite a nice (and fairly
    revealing) chart/graph to compare a basket of public spending examples
    from each of the say last 4 right and left wing administrations? charts in which typical spending trends/laws regarding each wing might become more obvious/apparent... that no matter WHAT they say (or advertise) it's
    always but always gonna BE that way with either party!

    that 'education' is therefore the ONLY answer to keeping the right wing
    out! (education typically being something the RW always deliberately cuts
    back on? hmm i wonder why!)

    2-cents...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)
  • From Jeremy H. Denisovan@1:229/2 to All on Friday, October 06, 2017 08:25:08
    From: david.j.worrell@gmail.com

    Half time show.

    The Real Reason Why Trump Hates The Environment: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T9Fhr_z_lxs

    ***

    25. Proposed repeal and replacement of the Clean Power Plan.
    Coal companies and Republican officials in many states opposed the
    plan, Mr. Obama’s signature climate policy, which set strict limits
    on carbon emissions from existing coal and gas-fired power plants.
    Mr. Trump issued an executive order in March instructing the E.P.A.
    to re-evaluate the plan, which is tied up in court and has not yet
    taken effect. In October, the E.P.A. proposed repealing the plan
    and opened a public comment period soliciting suggested replacements.

    [Tied up in court.]

    26. Announced intent to withdraw the United States from the
    Paris climate agreement. Arguing that it tied his hands in matters
    of domestic energy policy, Mr. Trump announced that the United States
    would withdraw from the Paris accord, under which the United States
    had pledged to cut emissions by 26 to 28 percent below 2005 levels
    by 2025. The Trump administration has formally notified the
    United Nations of its intent to withdraw, but it cannot complete
    the process until late 2020.

    [See half time show.]

    27. Proposed rescinding a rule that protected tributaries and
    wetlands under the Clean Water Act. Farmers, real estate developers,
    golf course owners and many Republicans opposed an Obama-era
    clarification of the Clean Water Act that extended protections
    over small waterways. Under Mr. Trump's direction, Mr. Pruitt
    released a proposal in June to roll back the expanded definition.

    [Can't be protecting small waterways. Good gawd. Use 'em.
    What are you worried about? Fuckin' birds or something?
    Since the 1970's about half of the birds are gone anyway...]

    28. Reopened a review of fuel-efficiency standards for cars and trucks. Automakers said it would be difficult and costly to meet fuel economy goals they had agreed upon with the Obama administration. Under Mr. Trump, the E.P.A.
    and Department of Transportation have reopened a standards review for model years 2021 through
    2025. The administration is also considering easing penalties on automakers who
    do not comply with the federal standards.

    [Aw, waaah, it's not going to be easy to prevent trillions of dollars
    in damages, and a significantly less unlivable planet. Waaah.]

    29. Recommended shrinking or modifying 10 national monuments
    Republicans in Congress said the Antiquities Act, which allows presidents to designate national monuments, had been abused by previous administrations. Mr. Obama used the law to protect more than 4 million acres of land and several million square miles
    of ocean. Mr. Trump ordered a review of recent monuments; his interior secretary, Ryan Zinke, recommended changes for 10 sites.

    [Chipping away even at national monuments. And just to give most of it
    away to big corporations.]

    30. Reviewing 12 marine protected areas
    As part of his April executive order aimed at expanding offshore oil and gas drilling, Mr. Trump called for a review of national marine sanctuaries and monuments designated or expanded within the past decade. In June, NOAA announced that 12 protected
    marine areas were under review.

    [Because there are TOO MANY protected areas in our oceans? Really?]

    31. Reviewing limits on toxic discharge from power plants into public waterways Utility and fossil fuel industry groups opposed the rule, which limited the amount of toxic metals — arsenic, lead and mercury, among others — power plants could release into public waterways. Industry representatives said complying with the
    guidelines, which were to take effect in 2018, would be extremely expensive. In
    September, Mr. Pruitt postponed the rule until 2020.

    [Yeah, just let them discharge toxic substances into public waterways.
    It costs too much to keep them out...]

    32. Reviewing rules regulating coal ash waste from power plants
    Utility industry groups petitioned to change the rule, which regulates how power plants dispose of coal ash in waste pits often located near waterways. The E.P.A. agreed to reconsider the rule.

    [So what if coal ash ends up in waterways, along with all the other
    toxic shit.]

    33. Reviewing emissions standards for new, modified and reconstructed power plants
    In addition to the Clean Power Plan, Mr. Trump's Executive Order on Promoting Energy Independence called on the E.P.A. to review a related rule limiting carbon dioxide emissions from new, modified, and reconstructed power plants.

    [Heck, we won't even limit carbon dioxide when we do new plants or upgrades.]

    34. Reviewing emissions rules for power plant start-ups, shutdowns and malfunctions
    Power companies and other industry groups sued the Obama administration over the rule, which asked 36 states to tighten emissions exemptions for power plants and other facilities. The E.P.A. under Mr. Trump asked the court to suspend the case while the
    rule undergoes review.

    [Obama was doing his part to help the world stop global warming.
    Trump is doing his best to tear ALL of that down. Against the will
    of the majority of the American people.]

    35. Announced plans to review greater sage grouse habitat protections
    Oil and gas industry leaders called the Obama administration's plan for protecting the bird “deeply flawed” and welcomed the Interior Department review, which will reassess restrictions on energy production.

    [Sage Grouse habitat? Are you fucking kidding me? Those aren't people.]

    36. Announced plans to rescind water pollution regulations for fracking on federal and Indian lands
    Energy companies petitioned the Bureau of Land Management to rescind the rule, which was proposed by Mr. Obama in 2015 but never enforced amid legal challenges. In July, the bureau announced plans to revoke the rule, citing Mr. Trump's "prioritization of
    domestic energy production."

    [Water pollution? Who gives a shit? More money for oil companies.]

    37. Reviewing new safety regulations on offshore drilling
    The American Petroleum Institute and other trade groups wrote to the Trump administration, raising concerns over oil rig safety regulations implemented after the 2010 Deepwater Horizon explosion and oil spill. In August, the Bureau
    of Safety and
    Environmental Enforcement confirmed it was moving forward with the review. Mr. Trump had ordered a review of the rules earlier in the year.

    [Oil spills. We can't be bothered to stop it if it's expensive.]

    38. Ordered a review of a rule regulating offshore oil and gas exploration by floating vessels in the Arctic
    As part of the expansive executive order on offshore drilling, Mr. Trump called
    for an immediate review of a rule intended to strengthen safety and environmental standards for exploratory drilling in the Arctic. The rule, a response to the 2013 Kulluk
    accident in the Gulf of Alaska, increased oversight of floating vessels and other mobile offshore drilling units.

    [Safety and environmental standards? Bah.]

    39. Proposed ending a restriction on exploratory drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge
    Republicans have long sought to to open the Alaska refuge to gas and oil driling. In August, an Interior Department internal memo proposed lifting restrictions on exploratory seismic studies in the region, which covers more than 30,000 square miles and
    is home to polar bears, caribou and other Arctic animals.

    [Just drill the shit out of everything in sight. It's more money and oil.
    So what if every other country is trying to minimize fossil fuel use.]

    40. Ordered a review of federal regulations on hunting methods in Alaska Obama-era rules prohibited certain hunting methods in Alaska’s national preserves. They overruled state law, which had allowed hunters to bait bears with food, shoot caribou from boats and kill bear cubs with their mothers present. Alaska sued the
    Interior Department, claiming that the regulations affected traditional harvesting. The Trump administration ordered a review.

    [Fair hunting? What a stupid idea.]

    41. Announced a review of emissions standards for trailers and glider kits Stakeholders in the transportation industry opposed the Obama-era rule, which for the first time applied emissions standards to trailers and glider vehicles.
    They argued that the E.P.A. lacked the authority to regulate them, because their products are
    not motorized.

    [Look, if it's from the Obama era, we tear it down, no matter what it is.]

    42. Reviewing a rule limiting methane emissions at new oil and gas drilling sites
    Lobbyists for the oil and gas industries petitioned Mr. Pruitt to reconsider a rule limiting emissions of methane and other pollutants from new and modified oil and gas wells. A federal appeals court has ruled that the E.P.A. must enforce the Obama-era
    regulation while it rewrites the rule. The E.P.A. said it may do so on a “case by case” basis.

    [They may not enforce anything at all.]

    43. Put on hold rules aimed at cutting methane emissions from landfills
    Waste industry groups objected to this Obama-era regulation, which required landfills to set up methane gas collection systems and monitor emissions. In May, the E.P.A. suspended enforcement of the new standards for 90 days, pending
    a review.
    Environmental groups challenged the action in court, but the delay period has since passed, throwing the status of the case into question.

    [Methane emissions r us.]

    44. Delayed a lawsuit over a rule regulating airborne mercury emissions from power plants
    Coal companies, along with Republican officials in several states, sued over this Obama-era rule, which regulated the amount of mercury and other pollutants
    that fossil fuel power plants can emit. They argued that the rule helped shutter coal plants,
    many of which were already compliant. Oral arguments in the case have been delayed while the E.P.A. reviews the rule.

    [Airborne mercury emissions r us.]

    45. Delayed a rule aiming to improve safety at facilities that use hazardous chemicals
    Chemical, agricultural and power industry groups said that the rule, a response
    to a 2013 explosion at a fertilizer plant that killed 15 people, did not increase safety. Mr. Pruitt delayed the standards until 2019, pending a review.
    Eleven states are now
    suing over the delay.

    [If you can't beat 'em, delay 'em. Safety is too expensive.]

    46. Continuing review of proposed groundwater protections for certain uranium mines
    Republicans in Congress came out against the 2015 rule. They said the E.P.A. had not conducted an adequate cost-benefit analysis of the rule, which regulated byproduct materials from a type of uranium mining. The Obama administration submitted a revised
    proposal one day before Mr. Trump was sworn into office. The Trump administration must now decide the fate of the rule.

    [It's an Obama era rule. And it's regulating something. So...duh.]

    47. Delayed compliance dates for federal building efficiency standards Republicans in Congress opposed the rules, which set efficiency standards for the design and construction of new federal buildings. The Trump administration delayed compliance until Sept. 30, but it is unclear whether the rules are now in effect.

    [Efficiency standards? That sounds... expensive. Duh.]

    48. Withdrew a rule that would help consumers buy more fuel-efficient tires
    The rule required tire manufacturers and retailers to provide consumers with information about replacement car tires. The tire industry opposed several aspects of the rule, but had been working with the government to refine it. The
    Trump administration
    withdrew the proposed rule in January but has not said whether it may be reinstated.

    [Because it will never be reinstated, not by them. Fuel efficiency?
    How does that make anyone more money?]

    Five other rules were reinstated after legal challenges:

    Environmental groups have sued the Trump administration over many of the proposed rollbacks, and, in some cases, have succeeded in reinstating environmental rules.

    1. Reinstated rule limiting methane emissions on public lands
    The oil and gas industry opposed the rule, which required companies to control methane emissions on federal or tribal land. The House voted this year to revoke the rule, but the Senate rejected the measure, 51 to 49. The Bureau of Land Management later
    suspended enforcement of parts of the rule. In early October, a federal court ruled that the B.L.M. had acted unlwafully in delaying the rule, and ordered its immediate enforcement.

    2. Reinstated a requirement for reporting emissions on federal highways Transportation and infrastructure industry groups opposed a measure that required state and local officials to track greenhouse gas emissions from vehichles on federally funded highways. The Trump administration twice postponed the rule's effective date,
    putting it off indefinitely on May 19. The rule was reinstated after environmental groups and eight states challenged the delay in court.

    3. Delayed by one year a compliance deadline for new ozone pollution standards,
    but later reversed course
    Mr. Pruitt initially delayed the compliance deadline for a 2015 national ozone standard, but reversed course after 15 states and the District of Columbia sued.

    4. Delayed publishing efficiency standards for household appliances
    After being sued by a number of states and environmental groups for failing to publish efficiency standards for appliances including heaters, air conditioners
    and refrigerators, the Trump administration released its rules on May 26.

    5. Reinstated rule limiting the discharge of mercury by dental offices into municipal sewers
    The E.P.A. reinstated an Obama-era rule that regulated the disposal of dental amalgam, a filling material that contains mercury and other toxic metals. The agency initially put the rule on hold as part of a broad regulatory freeze, but
    environmental
    groups sued. The American Dental Association came out in support of the rule.

    Sources: Harvard Law School’s Environmental Regulation Rollback Tracker; Columbia Law School’s Climate Deregulation Tracker; Federal Register; Environmental Protection Agency; White House

    ***

    Don't ever let anyone tell you voting doesn't matter because politicians
    never do anything anyway. Here are dozens of examples of the things
    politicians do.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)
  • From whisperoutloud@1:229/2 to All on Friday, October 06, 2017 08:28:38
    From: allreadydun@gmail.com

    yeah i feel the guilt, lol!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)
  • From Jeremy H. Denisovan@1:229/2 to slider on Friday, October 06, 2017 15:18:31
    From: david.j.worrell@gmail.com

    On Friday, October 6, 2017 at 10:22:51 AM UTC-7, slider wrote:
    On Fri, 06 Oct 2017 16:25:08 +0100, Jeremy H. Denisovan
    wrote:

    Don't ever let anyone tell you voting doesn't matter because politicians never do anything anyway. Here are dozens of examples of the things politicians do.

    ### - you got quite peeved one time when i suggested 'getting used to it' when yet 'another' right-wing government took office? plus i didn't actually mean anything by that except the mild sarcasm that such public spending 'cuts' are basically standard with & from ANY right wing administration!

    that consequently, the working-man is always slightly (ever so slightly only tho') better-off under a left-wing administration due to typical 'increases' in public spending, the opposite 'always' applying under the right wing wherein public spending is always reduced to, erm, 'save money' (hah! yeah but at who's expense??)

    and yes, *whatever's* imposed by either wing, they're always opposed at every step by the opposite wing, even to involving law cases/challenges whatever, whatever, but which, in the final analysis, always but always results in actual cuts to public spending in real terms whenever a right-wing party rules, and increases whenever the left manages things... (and 'that's' what i meant by 'get used to it' when trump got in and started slashing the public purse strings while lining the pockets of the wealthy, that it's always to be expected under them... nothing else)

    to prove/qualify this, it'd be quite interesting to see a similar list (as say the above) for the 'last' right-wing administration too for
    comparison? coz you can bet your bottom dollar public spending went down that time too? and rose again under obama...

    (basically the RW always rob the country blind to line their own pockets/secure themselves, and the left then do something to tilt it all back the other way again whenever the public become so stressed by austerity that they again vote en-mass for the left when the 'lies' of the right-wing become glaringly obvious... and then, just when the damage is almost repaired by the left; who should 'trick' their way right back in again and start robbing all & sundry all over again?? it never ends! and this basically because no one 'actually' ever really understands exactly WHAT they're voting for and/or WHY! (not really) else the right-wing would 'never again' get back in! period! an educated majority (of working class) would ALWAYS vote left + the right-wing is a 'minority' group so they'd always lose! that is unless they can somehow whittle down the lefts voters enough to even be ABLE to compete with them! plus the lengths they'll
    often go to TO reduce the lefts votes is literally astounding! often pure lies! - AND it happens every time!)

    the 'ultimate' solution therefore only being the education of the working man/class (the 80% majority after all...) who would then get to know/realise just WHY they HAVE to vote for the left every time without fail! that it ISN'T ever a personality contest! that they're perforce always better-off under the left no matter WHO is the figurehead!

    (thing is, you were so 'pissed' the last time we went over this (and my 'get-used' to it remark/sarcasm, which wasn't actually directed personally at you...) that i don't think you really took it all in?)

    and would, for example, probably make for quite a nice (and fairly revealing) chart/graph to compare a basket of public spending examples
    from each of the say last 4 right and left wing administrations? charts in which typical spending trends/laws regarding each wing might become more obvious/apparent... that no matter WHAT they say (or advertise) it's
    always but always gonna BE that way with either party!

    that 'education' is therefore the ONLY answer to keeping the right wing out! (education typically being something the RW always deliberately cuts back on? hmm i wonder why!)

    2-cents...

    Well, you're right about one thing. Trump is attempting to cut the
    general education budget. And Trump put an unqualified advocate of
    private, religious, and for-profit schools at the head of education,
    to the detriment of public education.

    Trump's “America First” budget aims for a 13% reduction in education spending, totaling about $9 billion. And $1.2 billion of those cuts
    are to programs for at-risk children.

    They're also cutting one of Obama’s signature grant programs,
    'Opening Doors, Expanding Opportunities', which supports local
    communities’ efforts at improving diversity and achievement
    in low-performing schools.

    Billions will also be cut from programs that help first-generation
    college students get into and pay for college, as well as from
    teaching training programs.

    Which parts of the education budget will benefit? About $1.4 billion
    will be shifted into voucher and school choice programs.

    (In other words, their policies here are just like their policies
    everywhere else, in that they hurt the poor and the middle class,
    and benefit the wealthy. It's reverse-Robin-Hood everywhere you
    look. Take from the poor and give to the rich. To me it's shameful.)

    The former education secretary under President Obama called DeVos’s
    new budget priorities “an assault on the American Dream that will disproportionately harm the poor and children of color.”

    DeVos isn’t an educator or an education leader. She’s not an expert
    in pedagogy or curriculum or school governance. In fact, she has no
    relevant credentials or experience for a job setting standards
    and guiding dollars for the nation’s public schools.

    She is, in essence, a lobbyist — someone who has used her wealth
    to influence the conversation about education reform, and to bend
    that conversation to her ideological convictions despite the lack
    of evidence supporting them.

    ***

    An important secondary action by this unqualified head of education:

    Candice Jackson was appointed by DeVos to be the new acting head
    to run the Office of Civil Rights, which investigates thousands of
    claims of discrimination every year by women and minorities.
    Jackson once spoke out about the discrimination that she herself
    claimed to face as a white college student. She opposes affirmative
    action, or “giving special assistance to minority students.”

    (So it's yet another "fox put in charge of the hen house" situation,
    where a person unsympathetic to minority problems was put in charge of
    the Office of Civil Rights. Such people are *everywhere* under Trump.
    This same person has also opposed "feminism", yet was put in charge
    of the office that's supposed to defend women from discrimination.)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)
  • From Jeremy H. Denisovan@1:229/2 to All on Monday, October 16, 2017 12:31:04
    From: david.j.worrell@gmail.com

    Study Reviews 1,154 Climate Science Results,
    Finds No Evidence of Publication Bias

    https://futurism.com/study-reviews-climate-science-results-no-evidence-publication-bias/

    Further strong confirmation that Trump and the Republican's stance
    on climate change and human-caused warming is dangerous and wrong.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)