• Re: set-back - sorted!

    From slider@1:229/2 to All on Thursday, December 26, 2019 02:57:42
    From: slider@atashram.com

    so there are no voices on this version, interesting.
    ok, i can dig it. this will work also. can't lose my man.

    ### - the only thing that's different now is the backing track? it's a
    sequence that appears in one of the other vids that has voice-overs, so
    had isolated it (minus the vocals) and played music over it instead and
    thus turned it into an extra/separate simulated lucid dream vid heh (it simulates a whole session of 3 or 4 WILDs) they objected to the backing
    track was all, which was a bastard to change hah (took a whole day for
    that + changing all the links to match on playlists & the website too? sheesh...)

    but it's all done now + have deleted the other one altogether so that's
    the end of that, this track's ok too, liked the other one more, but then
    ya can't always get what ya want, and will just have to be more careful in future innit :)

    so merry fuckin' christmas you thievin' bastards!

    hahaha :)))

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)
  • From slider@1:229/2 to All on Wednesday, December 25, 2019 22:25:06
    From: slider@anashram.com

    ### - well, i dunno how ya's spent your xmas's but basically spent mines re-editing + re-uploading 'The Lucid Dream' vid with a different sound
    track due to the unreasonableness (or scam) of the peeps currently
    claiming copyright on someone else's work...

    am not sure what's going on really, 'da I heard it records' says all their stuff is licensed under a creative-commons standard that allows sharing
    and redistribution in any format as long as you provide the correct
    attribution to the artists work and record company etc etc, something i
    had no problem complying with, particularly after finding said backing
    track on a royalty-free music site (was pretty careful about all that)

    but... something's not right here? because 'Orchard Music' are still
    claiming copyright even under that CC license?? so then i looked at the
    record company's youtube listing of that same tune, and there it is, the
    same song listed as 'again' being available and used under that particular license and yet openly also claimed by Orchard Music: even on their own
    page??? wtf!

    which can basically only mean that da i heard it records is working in
    cahoots with orchard music and therefore knows exactly what's going on,
    and either condones it coz they gets a cut (quite likely) or worse; are actually 'owned' by orchard music?? (which is what i kinda suspected originally)

    iow: some websites offering new artists some kinda chance to have their
    music heard, are, in reality, only doing so in order to acquire some kinda executive control over their copyrights (something they prolly agree to at signup in the small print) + get a service offering to monitor any misuse
    of their property rights (sounds reasonable enough huh)

    don't forget that their music is protected by a range of CC (creative
    commons) licenses which they either opt into or out of depending on what
    they want, this ranging from 'no protection at all' other than an
    attribution (at least they gets their name mentioned and a link to their
    home page or whatever kinda thing) right up to an all rights reserved,
    most opting for having their music used and shared to varying degrees so there's a whole bunch of varying licenses... the song i'd used fully
    allowing its usage according to its accompanying license, one chosen by
    the artists themselves!

    but orchard wont budge + da i heard it records have stopped replying, plus
    no reply from the artists themselves either via their FB page, they saw my message but didn't reply, so either they don't understand (is a french
    band) or they just don't care...

    either way am fucked with tryin' anymore to keep on with that one track,
    and even though it fucks things up some in lost views & hours (not that
    many) plus the order they were published in (which affects any playlists),
    have decided to dump the whole damn problem onetime by excluding that
    track (and thus 'orchard') altogether...

    so here it is again on a different link now, the same vid but with a
    different backing track (not a bad backing track) not the one i
    wanted/liked perhaps but good enough, and orchard music AND heard it
    records can go feck themselves blue hah!

    if i feels sorry for anyone tho' it's the artists who're being ripped off?
    and in this instance being barred, because of these fuckers, from having
    their music 'genuinely' heard/publicised, for free, to a potentially
    fairly large audience should this little video ever turn out to be quite popular?

    oh well never mind + better to change it now with only 90 hits than later
    when it's gots 1000's eh?

    those corrupt bastards ruin everything they touch innit eh?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aW740waJQNk

    :)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)
  • From sparkygriswold@1:229/2 to All on Wednesday, December 25, 2019 16:34:16
    From: allreadydun@gmail.com

    those corrupt bastards ruin everything they touch innit eh?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aW740waJQNk

    so there are no voices on this version, interesting.
    ok, i can dig it. this will work also. can't lose my man.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)
  • From slider@1:229/2 to All on Thursday, December 26, 2019 14:05:32
    From: slider@anashram.com

    ### - lol typical?

    re-edited that video and everything and all is now fine etc etc, and then
    i finally gets a message this morning back from that band saying:

    "Hey, you can use this song !"

    lol :)))

    but it's too late now!

    so it stands as-is...

    and is yet just another case of these shysters ruining things even for
    their own artists!

    anyway, have explained what happened with their song to them anyway, so
    maybe they'll leave that record company now and find a better one + really
    they should sue Orchard Music for claiming copyrights on their work and
    thus losing them potentially free publicity + any monies owing to them
    from any similar + on-going claims made by them which am better orchard
    didn't reveal...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)
  • From thang ornerythinchus@1:229/2 to All on Saturday, December 28, 2019 18:47:10
    From: thangolossus@gmail.com

    On Wed, 25 Dec 2019 22:25:06 -0000, slider <slider@anashram.com>
    wrote:

    ### - well, i dunno how ya's spent your xmas's
    <TRIM>

    Well mate most people in your much vaunted "wallyworld" spend it with
    loved ones, family, friends, neighbours and so on - not fucking around
    with some crap on youtube.

    Didn't ya have ya old wifey over, ya kids, ya friends and so on?
    What's going on?

    lol

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)