[continued from previous message]

replacing it with a plan that will do *far less* to regulate
emissions than what was previously planned. Again, that's a
significant step backward.

It's not all bad news, though, since many individual US states
are now on track to exceed the initial targets (Obama wanted to
cut emissions by roughly 32 percent below 2005 levels by 2030)
even in the absence of federal regulation. As a result, many
environmentalists contend that the original rules were too WEAK,
not too aggressive. Trump's EPA is making the rules far weaker
still, and also providing loopholes to get out of enforcement.

***

Okay, there are many things I haven't mentioned, but since there's
no chance in hell of you reading all this anyway, feel free to
just go ahead with your usual substanceless bullshit. :)

I could be wrong I guess, but you seem to be one of the fools who
PRETEND to care deeply about the environment but don't do shit
to really help.

.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)