https://ahvalnews6.com/us-turkey/russian-s-400-missiles-really-suck-pentagon
“The Russian manufactured air defense systems were totally
ineffective,” Dana White, the Pentagon’s chief spokesperson, said Thursday. “Russia and the regime demonstrated the ineffectiveness of
their systems again two days later, when those systems engaged accidentally.”
LOL!!
On Sat, 21 Apr 2018 12:12:08 +0100, thang ornerythinchus ><thangolossus@gmail.com> wrote:
https://ahvalnews6.com/us-turkey/russian-s-400-missiles-really-suck-pentagon >>
“The Russian manufactured air defense systems were totally
ineffective,” Dana White, the Pentagon’s chief spokesperson, said
Thursday. “Russia and the regime demonstrated the ineffectiveness of
their systems again two days later, when those systems engaged
accidentally.”
LOL!!
### - they didn't even deploy their s-400's, the shit ya see firing off
was syria's s-200's
so why didn't they (the russians) deploy their s-400's/retaliate as
promised?
because they (the targets) were apparently pre-arranged beforehand with
the russians!
don't believe everything ya hear sucker! :)
On Sat, 21 Apr 2018 12:24:04 +0100, slider <slider@anashram.org>
wrote:
On Sat, 21 Apr 2018 12:12:08 +0100, thang ornerythinchus
<thangolossus@gmail.com> wrote:
https://ahvalnews6.com/us-turkey/russian-s-400-missiles-really-suck-pentagon
“The Russian manufactured air defense systems were totally
ineffective,” Dana White, the Pentagon’s chief spokesperson, said
Thursday. “Russia and the regime demonstrated the ineffectiveness of
their systems again two days later, when those systems engaged
accidentally.”
LOL!!
### - they didn't even deploy their s-400's, the shit ya see firing off
was syria's s-200's
so why didn't they (the russians) deploy their s-400's/retaliate as
promised?
because they (the targets) were apparently pre-arranged beforehand with
the russians!
don't believe everything ya hear sucker! :)
I'm no sucker mate. I grew out of the 1970's but it appears you never
did. That is being sucked in. I got with the program but for my own
needs. I bought my first house when I was 18 and negotiated directly
with the sister of the old guy who had died in it alone. Got a good
deal, and 4 houses later, in a really nice underground power area of
two storey houses, at the ripe old age of 43, I paid off my final
mortgage.
No rent or lease costs for the last 20 years. Definitely not being a "sucker".
On the other hand, you're about my age, don't own any real estate,
still paying some sort of rent or lease fee to someone, until you die,
don't have a block of notes for a "rainy day", don't have
superannuation and don't have savings and investment accounts. It
means if I see something I want I actually can have it. Within reason
and totally against my grain I might say as well.
Being a sucker is not having adult children or if one does, being part
of an irreversible breakdown of relationships, or if that hasn't
happened, suffering significant lack of respect from those progeny.
None of which appllies to me. Therefore, cogito ergo summa, I am not
a fucking sucker, you cunt.
Oh yeah, my oldest grandson (just turned 14, I have a granddaughter
who is older) just flew from Perth to Melbourne to mix with our pro
footy teams and play in Melbourne against other Victorian teams - it's
around 4000km away from Perth (Australia is a BIG place). He's just
arranged his first job after school, 5/7, from 4pm to 9pm because he
wants to save to put himself through law. That is definitely not
being a sucker, having my DNA spread in such a satisfactory way :)
Have a good night/day (pissing down rain here, going into winter soon,
just enjoying some nice weed as well).
god bless the child who is out of debt.
debt sucks.
On Sat, 21 Apr 2018 13:00:47 +0100, thang ornerythinchus ><thangolossus@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 21 Apr 2018 12:24:04 +0100, slider <slider@anashram.org>
wrote:
On Sat, 21 Apr 2018 12:12:08 +0100, thang ornerythinchus
<thangolossus@gmail.com> wrote:
https://ahvalnews6.com/us-turkey/russian-s-400-missiles-really-suck-pentagon
“The Russian manufactured air defense systems were totally
ineffective,” Dana White, the Pentagon’s chief spokesperson, said
Thursday. “Russia and the regime demonstrated the ineffectiveness of >>>> their systems again two days later, when those systems engaged
accidentally.”
LOL!!
### - they didn't even deploy their s-400's, the shit ya see firing off
was syria's s-200's
so why didn't they (the russians) deploy their s-400's/retaliate as
promised?
because they (the targets) were apparently pre-arranged beforehand with
the russians!
don't believe everything ya hear sucker! :)
I'm no sucker mate. I grew out of the 1970's but it appears you never
did. That is being sucked in. I got with the program but for my own
needs. I bought my first house when I was 18 and negotiated directly
with the sister of the old guy who had died in it alone. Got a good
deal, and 4 houses later, in a really nice underground power area of
two storey houses, at the ripe old age of 43, I paid off my final
mortgage.
No rent or lease costs for the last 20 years. Definitely not being a
"sucker".
On the other hand, you're about my age, don't own any real estate,
still paying some sort of rent or lease fee to someone, until you die,
don't have a block of notes for a "rainy day", don't have
superannuation and don't have savings and investment accounts. It
means if I see something I want I actually can have it. Within reason
and totally against my grain I might say as well.
Being a sucker is not having adult children or if one does, being part
of an irreversible breakdown of relationships, or if that hasn't
happened, suffering significant lack of respect from those progeny.
None of which appllies to me. Therefore, cogito ergo summa, I am not
a fucking sucker, you cunt.
Oh yeah, my oldest grandson (just turned 14, I have a granddaughter
who is older) just flew from Perth to Melbourne to mix with our pro
footy teams and play in Melbourne against other Victorian teams - it's
around 4000km away from Perth (Australia is a BIG place). He's just
arranged his first job after school, 5/7, from 4pm to 9pm because he
wants to save to put himself through law. That is definitely not
being a sucker, having my DNA spread in such a satisfactory way :)
Have a good night/day (pissing down rain here, going into winter soon,
just enjoying some nice weed as well).
### - sucker for 'propaganda' ya twit! (which you've now widened to
include everything under the sun??)
that WAS the context after all...
and just because i didn't 'buy-into' the whole 'capitalist' thing doesn't >make me an idiot either, it merely makes me 'free' of (and from) all that!
i.e., am not tied down to anything and am ready to go at 30-seconds
notice, are you?
you got back in alright (well partially anyway 'coz you personally can
never 'actually' get in...) but it would take ya at least a month of
sundays to get back out again!
'getting-out' of things has always been my forte heh... ;)
god bless the child who is out of debt.
debt sucks.
### - thang is merely talking out his ass/only exaggerating heh;
debt/credit is how society works & functions, without it there wouldn't BE >the society we know it today because it wouldn't be able to afford to pay
up front for all it now has... the world we know only lives & exists
totally: on credit! (iow: debt)
e.g., Australia's net international investment liability position
(government debt and private debt) was $1,028.5 billion at 31 December
2016, an increase of $5.4 billion (0.5%) on the liability position at 31 >December 2016, according to the Australian Bureau of Statistics.
uk:
88.3% (debt) of GDP (2016) so technically bankrupt lol (e.g., for a
company, a legal max of around 45% debt exists as a guide/test as to
whether a company is still viable/should declare itself bankrupt/cease >trading etc... so at 83% debt versus its annual income it's @ almost
double the legal max; the uk is broke/owned by someone else!)
america:
Intra-governmental holdings stood at $5.35 trillion, giving a combined
total public debt of $19.19 trillion. U.S. GDP for the previous 12 months
was approximately $18.15 trillion, for a total debt to GDP ratio of >approximately 106%. (fuck me! 106%?? broke 4+ times over! LOL...)
Global debt hit an all-time high of $233 trillion (£169 trillion) in the >third quarter of 2017, according to the Institute of International Finance >(IIF). That's a $16 trillion increase on debt levels at the end of 2016
and more than three times the size of the global economy.5 Jan 2018
= 300%!!!!!!!! (versus 45% viable limit) = the WORLD is broke nearly
7-times over!
technically, if you're 'not' in debt, then you ain't playin' the game! not >contributing!
(thang doesn't pay all his bills up front for instance, like everyone else
he pays in arrears! you use shit and THEN ya pay for it; debt is
unavoidable, even for thang...)
On Sat, 21 Apr 2018 13:31:59 +0100, slider <slider@anashram.com>
wrote:
On Sat, 21 Apr 2018 13:00:47 +0100, thang ornerythinchus
<thangolossus@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 21 Apr 2018 12:24:04 +0100, slider <slider@anashram.org>
wrote:
On Sat, 21 Apr 2018 12:12:08 +0100, thang ornerythinchus
<thangolossus@gmail.com> wrote:
https://ahvalnews6.com/us-turkey/russian-s-400-missiles-really-suck-pentagon
“The Russian manufactured air defense systems were totally
ineffective,” Dana White, the Pentagon’s chief spokesperson, said >>>>> Thursday. “Russia and the regime demonstrated the ineffectiveness of >>>>> their systems again two days later, when those systems engaged
accidentally.”
LOL!!
### - they didn't even deploy their s-400's, the shit ya see firing
off
was syria's s-200's
so why didn't they (the russians) deploy their s-400's/retaliate as
promised?
because they (the targets) were apparently pre-arranged beforehand
with
the russians!
don't believe everything ya hear sucker! :)
I'm no sucker mate. I grew out of the 1970's but it appears you never
did. That is being sucked in. I got with the program but for my own
needs. I bought my first house when I was 18 and negotiated directly
with the sister of the old guy who had died in it alone. Got a good
deal, and 4 houses later, in a really nice underground power area of
two storey houses, at the ripe old age of 43, I paid off my final
mortgage.
No rent or lease costs for the last 20 years. Definitely not being a
"sucker".
On the other hand, you're about my age, don't own any real estate,
still paying some sort of rent or lease fee to someone, until you die,
don't have a block of notes for a "rainy day", don't have
superannuation and don't have savings and investment accounts. It
means if I see something I want I actually can have it. Within reason
and totally against my grain I might say as well.
Being a sucker is not having adult children or if one does, being part
of an irreversible breakdown of relationships, or if that hasn't
happened, suffering significant lack of respect from those progeny.
None of which appllies to me. Therefore, cogito ergo summa, I am not
a fucking sucker, you cunt.
Oh yeah, my oldest grandson (just turned 14, I have a granddaughter
who is older) just flew from Perth to Melbourne to mix with our pro
footy teams and play in Melbourne against other Victorian teams - it's
around 4000km away from Perth (Australia is a BIG place). He's just
arranged his first job after school, 5/7, from 4pm to 9pm because he
wants to save to put himself through law. That is definitely not
being a sucker, having my DNA spread in such a satisfactory way :)
Have a good night/day (pissing down rain here, going into winter soon,
just enjoying some nice weed as well).
### - sucker for 'propaganda' ya twit! (which you've now widened to
include everything under the sun??)
Jeez, you twist and turn. You've got more kinks than Ray Davies.
that WAS the context after all...
Well pardon me for being literal in the absence of metaphor or simile.
and just because i didn't 'buy-into' the whole 'capitalist' thing
doesn't
make me an idiot either, it merely makes me 'free' of (and from) all
that!
It makes me debt free and secure in my own home/house which, outside
of war with China, nobody can legally take from me, ever. If I had my "druthers" I'd rather be in my boots than yours.
i.e., am not tied down to anything and am ready to go at 30-seconds
notice, are you?
Yep, I'm a prepper, fully armed and fooded and ready to TACAMO ("take
charge and move out"). But I wouldn't - my place is solid brick and concrete, hardwood roofing, fired clay roof tiles, two storey and
built like a brick shithouse :) I would try to gather as many of my
family as I could in my house because it's defendable, built like a
german pillbox.
That is, unless the blast knocks it right down...
you got back in alright (well partially anyway 'coz you personally can
never 'actually' get in...) but it would take ya at least a month of
sundays to get back out again!
Slider I don't have financial committments. Don't you get it? No
debt, no mortgage, cash at hand, credit cards up to Gold Amex, no
loans, no HP, no leases. I can leave this place in a moment and there
is nothing to pay on it except for land rates to the local council.
The water and power might be cut off but can be reimplemented. No one
can take my house, period. I own it green title and freehold and free
of encumbrance. I'm in the minority.
'getting-out' of things has always been my forte heh... ;)
I never run. I may hide but I do not run.
I cannot think that we are useless or God
would not have created us.
And the sun, the darkness, the winds are all listening
to what we have to say.
Geronimo
Sysop: | sneaky |
---|---|
Location: | Ashburton,NZ |
Users: | 34 |
Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
Uptime: | 92:12:01 |
Calls: | 2,104 |
Calls today: | 5 |
Files: | 11,145 |
Messages: | 949,392 |
Posted today: | 4 |