Mate I think Putin is going to put a few warheads in your collective
UK basket.
He smirked when he was asked whether he authorised the Russian VX
knockoff to (attempt to) kill the traitor and now he's clearly killed
another enemy.
https://edition.cnn.com/2018/03/13/europe/nikolai-glushkov-russia-intl/index.html
Putin and his cronies are telling that retarded woman May not to
threaten a nuclear power. I think whatever Putin has on comrade Trump
will ensure that if Putin does hit the UK, Trump will sit back and not assist.
Alone, the UK would be no match at all for Russia.
Batten down the hatches Brian, there's a storm coming...
thang wrote...
Mate I think Putin is going to put a few warheads in your collective
UK basket.
He smirked when he was asked whether he authorised the Russian VX
knockoff to (attempt to) kill the traitor and now he's clearly killed
another enemy.
https://edition.cnn.com/2018/03/13/europe/nikolai-glushkov-russia-intl/index.html
Putin and his cronies are telling that retarded woman May not to
threaten a nuclear power. I think whatever Putin has on comrade Trump
will ensure that if Putin does hit the UK, Trump will sit back and not
assist.
Alone, the UK would be no match at all for Russia.
Batten down the hatches Brian, there's a storm coming...
### - smile, we don't really know what's going on here nor why?
chances are we did something horrible to them first though (i.e., our
james bond killed or whatever some of their agents/defectors) and then
'this' is what typically happens with any previous/prior agreements...
could be completely wrong of course (heh) but russia hardly ever seems to
be the one to make the first move in anything? they're usually attacked
first and only then retaliate etc etc?
and then 'we' make a big public hoo-ha over whatever reprisals occur;
putin no doubt smirking upon hearing the uk's 'version' of the story
that's been released to the press, like he knows what 'really' happened & >why, which am sure he prolly does know heh...
his message being one of: it's no good thinking you're 'safe' if you're
not really safe innit! we can get to ya's anytime! anywhere! so don't mess >with russia!
is anyone... safe??
lol prolly not :)))We can easily forgive a child who is afraid of the dark;
On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 06:28:09 -0000, slider <slider@anashram.com>
wrote:
thang wrote...
Mate I think Putin is going to put a few warheads in your collective
UK basket.
He smirked when he was asked whether he authorised the Russian VX
knockoff to (attempt to) kill the traitor and now he's clearly killed
another enemy.
https://edition.cnn.com/2018/03/13/europe/nikolai-glushkov-russia-intl/index.html
Putin and his cronies are telling that retarded woman May not to
threaten a nuclear power. I think whatever Putin has on comrade Trump
will ensure that if Putin does hit the UK, Trump will sit back and not
assist.
Alone, the UK would be no match at all for Russia.
Batten down the hatches Brian, there's a storm coming...
### - smile, we don't really know what's going on here nor why?
Well actually, yes "we" do. Putin has left a trail of assasinated
bodies across Europe (but never the US - bullies are like that) for a
long time now, remember Litvinenko? Killed by polonium in London in
2006? Polonium can only be manufactured by a state like Russia - I
doubt even the UK could process uranium into polonium.
chances are we did something horrible to them first though (i.e., our
james bond killed or whatever some of their agents/defectors) and then
'this' is what typically happens with any previous/prior agreements...
That's completely brain fucked Brian. Try thinking for once. Only
Putin would have the clout in Russia to authorise/order an
assasination on foreign soil and the only reason he has hit these
former spies and in this case the daughter of a former spy is because
he thought he could get away with it because he considers the UK to be intrinsically weak (as I said, if he did this in the US, it would be considered an act of war - that's why he has never done this in the US
and will never do this in the US, he's basically a pragmatic coward).
You clearly know nothing. Go back to your dreams.
BTW, tell me why you use grammar like "previous/prior"? Don't they
mean the same thing? What point are you trying to make?
You haven't improved at all in my absence...
could be completely wrong of course (heh) but russia hardly ever seems
to
be the one to make the first move in anything? they're usually attacked
first and only then retaliate etc etc?
You *are* "completely wrong". What about Ukraine, and expecially the
Crimea? Are you going to rewrite history - Ukraine attacked Russia?
Lol. Chechnya? Georgia? Forgotten them as well? Going back, how
about Czechoslovakia in 1968? Iran, commonly known as Russia's
Vietnam?
and then 'we' make a big public hoo-ha over whatever reprisals occur;
putin no doubt smirking upon hearing the uk's 'version' of the story
that's been released to the press, like he knows what 'really' happened
&
why, which am sure he prolly does know heh...
Yeah, except after May has just expelled his diplomatic corps and will probably sieze Putins' gangster oligarch friends' assets in London,
Putin is sneering on the other side of his face. He never expected
this from May and I for one have some respect for the woman now. Nikki
Haley just condemned the Russians in the UN, a few hours ago. The
entire world is turning against the cunts.
"What really happened", Brian, is Putin, old KGB hand that he is,
ordered an assasination in London, as he has done before and gotten
away with it. This time, it backfired.
That's "what really happened" you turncoat :)
his message being one of: it's no good thinking you're 'safe' if you're
not really safe innit! we can get to ya's anytime! anywhere! so don't
mess
with russia!
Russia is quite an impoverished nation. It depends on foreign
currency injection through the sale of fossil fuels and armaments to
prop up its gangster elite. That, now, will dry up. May might invoke
NATO provisions against Russia and it looks as though Trump is now
firmly behind May along with Merkel and others. We in Australia will certainly condemn the cunts, and rightly so.
What are they going to do? Start an unwinnable war? Russia is ringed
by Trident SLBMs with over 4000 450kt warheads aimed from 14 Ohio
ballistic submarines, the Russians have only one ballistic submarine
Typhoon class, the remainder are rusting relics.
is anyone... safe??
You are, in your ignorance. Head in sand as usual.
We can easily forgive a child who is afraid of the dark;
lol prolly not :)))
the real tragedy of life is when men are afraid of the light.
Plato
### - with all due respect, you have a somewhat rather romantic/biased
view of things and so really don't know what you're talking about? :)
e.g., have a little look at this spy series i kinda grew up with...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NTHTR9JZgAk
used to like callan hehehe ;)
On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 23:05:03 -0000, thang ornerythinchus ><thangolossus@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 06:28:09 -0000, slider <slider@anashram.com>
wrote:
thang wrote...
Mate I think Putin is going to put a few warheads in your collective
UK basket.
He smirked when he was asked whether he authorised the Russian VX
knockoff to (attempt to) kill the traitor and now he's clearly killed
another enemy.
https://edition.cnn.com/2018/03/13/europe/nikolai-glushkov-russia-intl/index.html
Putin and his cronies are telling that retarded woman May not to
threaten a nuclear power. I think whatever Putin has on comrade Trump >>>> will ensure that if Putin does hit the UK, Trump will sit back and not >>>> assist.
Alone, the UK would be no match at all for Russia.
Batten down the hatches Brian, there's a storm coming...
### - smile, we don't really know what's going on here nor why?
Well actually, yes "we" do. Putin has left a trail of assasinated
bodies across Europe (but never the US - bullies are like that) for a
long time now, remember Litvinenko? Killed by polonium in London in
2006? Polonium can only be manufactured by a state like Russia - I
doubt even the UK could process uranium into polonium.
chances are we did something horrible to them first though (i.e., our
james bond killed or whatever some of their agents/defectors) and then
'this' is what typically happens with any previous/prior agreements...
That's completely brain fucked Brian. Try thinking for once. Only
Putin would have the clout in Russia to authorise/order an
assasination on foreign soil and the only reason he has hit these
former spies and in this case the daughter of a former spy is because
he thought he could get away with it because he considers the UK to be
intrinsically weak (as I said, if he did this in the US, it would be
considered an act of war - that's why he has never done this in the US
and will never do this in the US, he's basically a pragmatic coward).
You clearly know nothing. Go back to your dreams.
BTW, tell me why you use grammar like "previous/prior"? Don't they
mean the same thing? What point are you trying to make?
You haven't improved at all in my absence...
could be completely wrong of course (heh) but russia hardly ever seems
to
be the one to make the first move in anything? they're usually attacked
first and only then retaliate etc etc?
You *are* "completely wrong". What about Ukraine, and expecially the
Crimea? Are you going to rewrite history - Ukraine attacked Russia?
Lol. Chechnya? Georgia? Forgotten them as well? Going back, how
about Czechoslovakia in 1968? Iran, commonly known as Russia's
Vietnam?
and then 'we' make a big public hoo-ha over whatever reprisals occur;
putin no doubt smirking upon hearing the uk's 'version' of the story
that's been released to the press, like he knows what 'really' happened
&
why, which am sure he prolly does know heh...
Yeah, except after May has just expelled his diplomatic corps and will
probably sieze Putins' gangster oligarch friends' assets in London,
Putin is sneering on the other side of his face. He never expected
this from May and I for one have some respect for the woman now. Nikki
Haley just condemned the Russians in the UN, a few hours ago. The
entire world is turning against the cunts.
"What really happened", Brian, is Putin, old KGB hand that he is,
ordered an assasination in London, as he has done before and gotten
away with it. This time, it backfired.
That's "what really happened" you turncoat :)
his message being one of: it's no good thinking you're 'safe' if you're
not really safe innit! we can get to ya's anytime! anywhere! so don't
mess
with russia!
Russia is quite an impoverished nation. It depends on foreign
currency injection through the sale of fossil fuels and armaments to
prop up its gangster elite. That, now, will dry up. May might invoke
NATO provisions against Russia and it looks as though Trump is now
firmly behind May along with Merkel and others. We in Australia will
certainly condemn the cunts, and rightly so.
What are they going to do? Start an unwinnable war? Russia is ringed
by Trident SLBMs with over 4000 450kt warheads aimed from 14 Ohio
ballistic submarines, the Russians have only one ballistic submarine
Typhoon class, the remainder are rusting relics.
is anyone... safe??
You are, in your ignorance. Head in sand as usual.
We can easily forgive a child who is afraid of the dark;
lol prolly not :)))
the real tragedy of life is when men are afraid of the light.
Plato
### - with all due respect, you have a somewhat rather romantic/biased
view of things and so really don't know what you're talking about? :)
e.g., have a little look at this spy series i kinda grew up with...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NTHTR9JZgAk
used to like callan hehehe ;)
Stop top posting you dill.
I watched probably every episode of Edward Woodward doing his
inimitable Callan, a real spy who really killed when it was absolutely necessary. Very realistic and very, very dry.
One episode sticks in my memory. He has to take on a junior MI6 spy
(an intern if you like), glossy bell bottom trousers, airbrushed hair
and taste in music extending to Hawkwind and the like. I remember
Callan walks in and Hawkwind is playing on the record player, Callan
breezes in and with typical disdain says something like "Turn that
dross off"...
Problem was, it wasn't dross, it was *this*:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JgrKUDQQKsc
Lenny on drums I believe :)
thango wrote...
### - with all due respect, you have a somewhat rather romantic/biased
view of things and so really don't know what you're talking about? :)
e.g., have a little look at this spy series i kinda grew up with...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NTHTR9JZgAk
used to like callan hehehe ;)
Stop top posting you dill.
I watched probably every episode of Edward Woodward doing his
inimitable Callan, a real spy who really killed when it was absolutely
necessary. Very realistic and very, very dry.
One episode sticks in my memory. He has to take on a junior MI6 spy
(an intern if you like), glossy bell bottom trousers, airbrushed hair
and taste in music extending to Hawkwind and the like. I remember
Callan walks in and Hawkwind is playing on the record player, Callan
breezes in and with typical disdain says something like "Turn that
dross off"...
Problem was, it wasn't dross, it was *this*:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JgrKUDQQKsc
Lenny on drums I believe :)
### - if you really saw so many episodes of callen (i always liked that >series as a kid 'and' probably also saw all of them too...) then you also >know that the majority of their dirty jobs were usually in the form of >tit-for-tat? that there was usually always a good reason for any job +
callen often sweated the borderline cases but still did his job anyway...
that a kind of status quo was often struck between mi5/6 and the 'enemy' >(usually russia) with certain exceptions; and that most of the spies were >known quantities on both sides but tolerated for whatever various reasons, >sometimes even to deliberately relaying 'disinformation' to the enemy (as
in triple cross/the true eddie chapman story i posted), and that ALL
nations are/were basically spying on all the other nations, with them all >following each other around and giving each other the slip etc etc heh;
and then some diplomatic incident would arise and each country would
publicly expel a dozen or so 'diplomats' (read: spies) from each other's >country heh tit-for-tat-wise, and that it's all been going on for simply >decades and will prolly never end!
so when i say/suggest that russia must have done what they've done
recently (IF in fact they did it, i mean, because sometimes it's a also a >total set up!) for a reason, then it's prolly not 'that' far from the
truth? we the public, of course, never hearing of the 'real' reasons
behind anything except perhaps when black propaganda's involved (the >deliberate blackening/demonising of an enemy for whatever political >purposes...) such as, for example and imho, the downing of flight mh17
that time in ukraine, something which bore all the hallmarks of a black >propaganda campaign (i even called it about a month beforehand because
russia was winning and had left them with basically no alternative to
crimea? a situation itself directly brought about by western interference
in ukraine, to the point that, if it continued, russia was gonna be
cut-off from their only port to the black sea unless they did something
about it!)
so litvinchenko just killed outta the blue so spectacularly that time for >nada? (riiight...) and now these 2 for no apparent reason either?? (double >riiiight, although i suspect that when things like nerve gas or radiation
is involved it's all for show and we don't really know 'which' side did it >nor why... but you can bet your bottom dollar it wasn't just for nothing
nor mere a random event! to kill 2 of their defecting russian agents and
then blame it on the russians themselves wouldn't be the first time
something like that's happened either?!)
one thing i do know for sure though, is that it's almost certain that >whatever 'public' reasons are provided/given, they're probably not
correct! and there's another reason altogether that we'll never know!
that the way 'both' of those incidents (litvenchenko & these latest) were >released to the press involving extremely controversial methods, were very >likely deliberately + singularly 'designed' to 'make noise' AND to raise >negative public opinion! possibly as justification for what's coming next
in a seemingly then justified response! (might be used as a half-valid
reason for putting more armed police on the streets for example, for
suddenly increasing that budget/spending, or shutting ports!)
that when all these things are usually completely covert anyway, best
advise is to pay no attention when it's made public like this as we are >basically being 'told' what to think AND where to look!
that when they thus command everyone to: eyes-left! i usually tend to look >eyes-right because of knowing/realising things like that...
and don't bash callen 'coz he wasn't a hawkwind fan lol, the ONLY thing
the 'complete outsider' callen ever seemed to like; was his hand-painted >model lead soldiers!
(outsiders can be a bit quirky like that sometimes innit heh) ;)
truncated the rest because redundant hehehe...
On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 11:50:32 -0000, slider <slider@anashram.com>
wrote:
thango wrote...
### - with all due respect, you have a somewhat rather romantic/biased >>>> view of things and so really don't know what you're talking about? :)
e.g., have a little look at this spy series i kinda grew up with...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NTHTR9JZgAk
used to like callan hehehe ;)
Stop top posting you dill.
I watched probably every episode of Edward Woodward doing his
inimitable Callan, a real spy who really killed when it was absolutely
necessary. Very realistic and very, very dry.
One episode sticks in my memory. He has to take on a junior MI6 spy
(an intern if you like), glossy bell bottom trousers, airbrushed hair
and taste in music extending to Hawkwind and the like. I remember
Callan walks in and Hawkwind is playing on the record player, Callan
breezes in and with typical disdain says something like "Turn that
dross off"...
Problem was, it wasn't dross, it was *this*:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JgrKUDQQKsc
Lenny on drums I believe :)
### - if you really saw so many episodes of callen (i always liked that
series as a kid 'and' probably also saw all of them too...) then you
also
know that the majority of their dirty jobs were usually in the form of
tit-for-tat? that there was usually always a good reason for any job +
callen often sweated the borderline cases but still did his job
anyway...
I doubt I saw all of them and I didn't see his movies which I think
were not monochrome. However my old man was a Callan nut and I sort
of liked Callan's personality issues, psychological issues and so on
but it was waaaay too grown up for me at that age - I had girls,
parties, peer group stuff and so on on my mind. I was only 12 when
the series started after all.
But I recall seeing a lot of them and the old man was gripped by the
realism of the series and the coldness of Callan himself. I'm going
to edit what I wrote though, the Hawkwind was playing in Toby's flat - remember Toby, Callan's sidekick who was a real time psychopathic
killer who enjoyed killing, unlike Callan to whom killing was an
unfortunate part of the job. Toby had the mod clothes and the beatle haircut, good looking guy but totally whacko killer who was educated
by Callan and I think Callan killed him at some point with a bit of
relish too...
The show puts to shame even modern CIA, FBI, MI6 stuff and definitely
puts to shame Sean et al as Bond. Mitchell was a script writer and I
don't think Fleming ever wrote scripts (but I might be wrong) and
Mitchell was nothing short of genius for creating Callan.
Fond remembrance. I've managed to find torrents for series 3 and 4
and the movie and I'm DL'ing as we "speak". Meanwhile, for your
enjoyment, there's *this*:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j8kQyZ76mCk
that a kind of status quo was often struck between mi5/6 and the 'enemy'
(usually russia) with certain exceptions; and that most of the spies
were
known quantities on both sides but tolerated for whatever various
reasons,
sometimes even to deliberately relaying 'disinformation' to the enemy
(as
in triple cross/the true eddie chapman story i posted), and that ALL
nations are/were basically spying on all the other nations, with them
all
following each other around and giving each other the slip etc etc heh;
and then some diplomatic incident would arise and each country would
publicly expel a dozen or so 'diplomats' (read: spies) from each other's
country heh tit-for-tat-wise, and that it's all been going on for simply
decades and will prolly never end!
so when i say/suggest that russia must have done what they've done
recently (IF in fact they did it, i mean, because sometimes it's a also
a
total set up!) for a reason, then it's prolly not 'that' far from the
truth? we the public, of course, never hearing of the 'real' reasons
behind anything except perhaps when black propaganda's involved (the
deliberate blackening/demonising of an enemy for whatever political
purposes...) such as, for example and imho, the downing of flight mh17
that time in ukraine, something which bore all the hallmarks of a black
propaganda campaign (i even called it about a month beforehand because
russia was winning and had left them with basically no alternative to
crimea? a situation itself directly brought about by western
interference
in ukraine, to the point that, if it continued, russia was gonna be
cut-off from their only port to the black sea unless they did something
about it!)
so litvinchenko just killed outta the blue so spectacularly that time
for
nada? (riiight...) and now these 2 for no apparent reason either??
(double
riiiight, although i suspect that when things like nerve gas or
radiation
is involved it's all for show and we don't really know 'which' side did
it
nor why... but you can bet your bottom dollar it wasn't just for nothing
nor mere a random event! to kill 2 of their defecting russian agents and
then blame it on the russians themselves wouldn't be the first time
something like that's happened either?!)
one thing i do know for sure though, is that it's almost certain that
whatever 'public' reasons are provided/given, they're probably not
correct! and there's another reason altogether that we'll never know!
that the way 'both' of those incidents (litvenchenko & these latest)
were
released to the press involving extremely controversial methods, were
very
likely deliberately + singularly 'designed' to 'make noise' AND to raise
negative public opinion! possibly as justification for what's coming
next
in a seemingly then justified response! (might be used as a half-valid
reason for putting more armed police on the streets for example, for
suddenly increasing that budget/spending, or shutting ports!)
that when all these things are usually completely covert anyway, best
advise is to pay no attention when it's made public like this as we are
basically being 'told' what to think AND where to look!
that when they thus command everyone to: eyes-left! i usually tend to
look
eyes-right because of knowing/realising things like that...
and don't bash callen 'coz he wasn't a hawkwind fan lol, the ONLY thing
the 'complete outsider' callen ever seemed to like; was his hand-painted
model lead soldiers!
(outsiders can be a bit quirky like that sometimes innit heh) ;)
truncated the rest because redundant hehehe...
Putin has a major problem now that the second guy has been murdered.
His problem is not what you think it is. His problem is the World Cup
which will be held in Russia. This is probably the most beloved
annual sporting event in the world.
If Putin's actions, cunt that he is, cause the Cup to be boycotted,
Putin will suffer enormously. Nothing else will sting like a mass
boycott of the World Cup and if this occurs, Putin will at last be
hung out to dry by his own people.
That will be a bad thing happening to a bad person. Karma baby...
"If the quark masses,or the basic forces, or the cosmological constant
had been much different, the Universe would have been a sterile
wasteland.
It seems that the only reactions are either to embrace a multiverse
or a designer."
Tim Maudlin, New York University
| Sysop: | sneaky |
|---|---|
| Location: | Ashburton,NZ |
| Users: | 31 |
| Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
| Uptime: | 103:30:00 |
| Calls: | 2,071 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 11,135 |
| Messages: | 947,037 |