• God, atheism, morality and the survival instinct

    From Rainbowlove@1:229/2 to All on Monday, March 05, 2018 02:31:07
    XPost: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy, alt.philosophy.thaoism, alt.atheism
    From: rainbowguardian@web.de

    Ok let's go before hominids, let's say apes. They probably created a
    simple "moral" system of not injuring each other, because injuring
    damages the body and is not beneficial for the herd as a connected
    collective, which depend on the health of each others, and that damage
    is registered as nerve impulses that create a painful feeling in the
    brain. It's registered as a negative feeling that hinders survival but
    what or who or why do we have that instinct for survival (from) .
    There's no logical reason for the survival instinct and a fear of death
    if one dies from natural cause! Maybe we should go back further and look
    at hungerpain as a survival pusher, let's say amoebae or one-cellers did
    they feel pain when not enough food was around? why should anyone strive
    for survival other than pain, and if hungerpain pushed for survival and
    the fear of death, why did apes fear death, since then probably nobody
    knew what comes after death. did they realize observing their dead
    relatives that after death there's maybe nothing left? did they strive
    for immortality, though they also observed death from old age. Where
    they irrational? did the amoebae realize there's maybe nothing after
    death. and if there wasn't anything after death, why should they long
    for survival, joy of living ? ego? what programmed a joy for living in
    us. positive feelings of the amoebae of getting nutritions, why? there
    comes again the question of the survival into the game, etc.!
    Where's the logical reason for simple creatures for a survival instinct?

    --
    https://cosmicpurple.wordpress.com/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)
  • From Rainbowlove@1:229/2 to All on Monday, March 05, 2018 02:44:22
    XPost: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy, alt.philosophy.taoism, alt.atheism
    From: rainbowguardian@web.de

    Ok let's go before hominids, let's say apes. They probably created a
    simple "moral" system of not injuring each other, because injuring
    damages the body and is not beneficial for the herd as a connected
    collective, which depend on the health of each others, and that damage
    is registered as nerve impulses that create a painful feeling in the
    brain. It's registered as a negative feeling that hinders survival but
    what or who or why do we have that instinct for survival (from) .
    There's no logical reason for the survival instinct and a fear of death
    if one dies from natural cause! Maybe we should go back further and look
    at hungerpain as a survival pusher, let's say amoebae or one-cellers did
    they feel pain when not enough food was around? why should anyone strive
    for survival other than pain, and if hungerpain pushed for survival and
    the fear of death, why did apes fear death, since then probably nobody
    knew what comes after death. did they realize observing their dead
    relatives that after death there's maybe nothing left? did they strive
    for immortality, though they also observed death from old age. Where
    they irrational? did the amoebae realize there's maybe nothing after
    death. and if there wasn't anything after death, why should they long
    for survival, joy of living ? ego? what programmed a joy for living in
    us. positive feelings of the amoebae of getting nutritions, why? there
    comes again the question of the survival into the game, etc.!
    Where's the logical reason for simple creatures for a survival instinct?

    --
    https://cosmicpurple.wordpress.com/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)
  • From slider@1:229/2 to All on Monday, March 05, 2018 11:28:45
    From: slider@anashram.com

    Rainbowlove wrote...

    Ok let's go before hominids, let's say apes. They probably created a
    simple "moral" system of not injuring each other, because injuring
    damages the body and is not beneficial for the herd as a connected collective, which depend on the health of each others, and that damage
    is registered as nerve impulses that create a painful feeling in the
    brain. It's registered as a negative feeling that hinders survival but
    what or who or why do we have that instinct for survival (from) .
    There's no logical reason for the survival instinct and a fear of death
    if one dies from natural cause! Maybe we should go back further and look
    at hungerpain as a survival pusher, let's say amoebae or one-cellers did
    they feel pain when not enough food was around? why should anyone strive
    for survival other than pain, and if hungerpain pushed for survival and
    the fear of death, why did apes fear death, since then probably nobody
    knew what comes after death. did they realize observing their dead
    relatives that after death there's maybe nothing left? did they strive
    for immortality, though they also observed death from old age. Where
    they irrational? did the amoebae realize there's maybe nothing after
    death. and if there wasn't anything after death, why should they long
    for survival, joy of living ? ego? what programmed a joy for living in
    us. positive feelings of the amoebae of getting nutritions, why? there
    comes again the question of the survival into the game, etc.!
    Where's the logical reason for simple creatures for a survival instinct?

    ### - i'd imagine that the first creatures were merely driven by hunger to
    eat?

    and then, when other creatures came along that liked to eat 'other'
    creatures, the instinct to avoid being eaten evolved and thus a kind of arms-race developed between predator & prey, something which they
    think/suggest then gave rise to increasing levels of awareness &
    intelligence in ever-higher forms and expressions (of life) over millions
    & millions of years...

    all creatures thus survived and evolved living entirely in the moment
    (i.e., non-intellectually) basically by instinct alone, that is until we
    human came along whereby 'we' can apparently anticipate danger as a
    conceivable idea, even though many instinctual mechanisms still remain in
    us as reflex reactions (as in the 'fight or flight' response for
    example...)

    accordingly, if one lives entirely in the moment (as all creatures except
    us do) there is no such fear of death per se nor any anticipation of it,
    the fight or flight response is/was enough to account for everything
    that's happened right up until we humans appeared; and then the game
    changes!

    and what a fucking MESS we've made of it!

    yes/no?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)