I have some questions about this BBS software. I've been toying with the idea of a Telnet BBS.under
Som here we go!
1. Does this BBS software have it's own "frontdoor" for echos like Fidonet?
2. Does this BBS software have it's own mail tosser?
3. Is there anyone out there would like to talk me through, on the phone, setting one up, Step by Step?
FWIW, I used to be a BBS owner in the 1990's. I ran TAG, frontdoor, Gecho
DOS. Needless to say, things have changed!
Thanks,
-Chuck Adkins K8CPA
Lincoln Park, Mi
... Computer Hacker wanted. Must have own axe.
--- MultiMail/Win v0.52
� Synchronet � Battlestar BBS - battlestarbbs.dyndns.org
--- Synchronet 3.17c-Win32 NewsLink 1.111
* Vertrauen - Riverside County, California - telnet://vert.synchro.net
On 02-02-20 11:51, mrbrad wrote to alt.bbs.synchronet <=-
I've got a question. I have a static IP line. Would it be best to just
set this up with ONLY the static IP line and synchronet and just use a
2nd Inet (not static) for my personal use. In other words, risk of
stuff going wrong on the sbbs end and not use personal inet time on the supposed dedicated static IP for synchronet.
I guess a 'side question' is could I setup the static IP line with 2 routers and accomplish the same thing above?
To: mrbradI
On 02-02-20 11:51, mrbrad wrote to alt.bbs.synchronet <=-
mr> I've got a question. I have a static IP line. Would it be best to just
mr> set this up with ONLY the static IP line and synchronet and just use a
mr> 2nd Inet (not static) for my personal use. In other words, risk of
mr> stuff going wrong on the sbbs end and not use personal inet time on the
mr> supposed dedicated static IP for synchronet.
I'm not following your reasoning. $44/month extra just to run a BBS seems excessive. My overhead for my IPv4 tunnel is less than that for a _year_ and
get 14 useable static IPs.to
A BBS uses so little data it's not worth separating it out. If you did want
run the BBS separately, a cheaper route would be to host it on a VPSexternally
($10/month or less is possible with some shopping around).then
But for most people, simply setting the BBS up on a static internal IP and
port forwarding the relevant ports (telnet, SSB, binkp, etc) is the best way.
mr> I guess a 'side question' is could I setup the static IP line with 2
mr> routers and accomplish the same thing above?
That would depend on your ISP. It sometimes is possible.
... The master has failed more times than the beginner has even tried.
=== MultiMail/Win v0.51
--- SBBSecho 3.10-Linux
* Origin: Freeway BBS Bendigo,Australia freeway.apana.org.au (3:633/410) --- Synchronet 3.17c-Win32 NewsLink 1.111
* Vertrauen - Riverside County, California - telnet://vert.synchro.net
A BBS uses so little data it's not worth separating it out.
On 02-02-20 20:44, mrbrad wrote to alt.bbs.synchronet <=-
Sorry. Static IP with Spetrum in my area is $125 even a month.
Also I plan to run 'unsupported' bbs pkg (worldgroup and major bbs)
maybe if i had the synchronet as a front end in that it has no major security problems I could pull that off. In that sbbs was updated
1/1/19.
Static IP per say is mainly for the WG/MBBS/vitcom TCP/IP (static IP)
ad other stuff like majormud and telearena etc.....a snarl of old wg
bbs stuff.
So yeah, it is spendy out here. Also have a Bitcoin Biz thus the static
IP I can write the works off..ths static/ip biz line if I went this
route.
I called spectrum they said they would be happy to do the separate
router for the same fee as just picking up the other personal use $44
buck variable IP personal inet line....so no redress there. Dubious security anyway. Or I could buy another router and split and like you
said no real security improvement
fun/fun. Anyway, no real time lately but I keep thinking about getting
the lost gonzo bbs/nostaligia bbs back up but a lot of work for one
guy.
I'll just muddle through I guess, thanks for the help.
On 02-03-20 12:47, Paul Quinn wrote to Tony Langdon <=-
@VIA: VERT
Hi! Tony,
On 03 Feb 20 09:57, you wrote to mrbrad:
A BBS uses so little data it's not worth separating it out.
That's what I thought, till it came time to upgrade the OS. So, I converted the Fidonet operation to a VirtualBox, to transfer it to my other server PC. (Docker things would work as well but that technology
is foreign to me.)
Ooh. My Fidonet is back on this PC. My other node is on the other PC.
Can't tell, can you. ;)
Well, that depends on your quota. :) I'm on unlimited, so I don't give a rat's. :D
Can't tell, can you. ;)
Don't know, don't care. :D
other server PC. (Docker things would work as well but that technology is foreign to me.)
If you want help with docker - I can help you there.
I run SBBS in docker, and used to run MBSE and Mystic in docker - but no DOS doors though (I didnt get that far - is doable though)...
On 02-03-20 17:34, Paul Quinn wrote to Vk3jed <=-
Hi! Tony,
On 02/03/2020 03:35 PM, you wrote:
Well, that depends on your quota. :) I'm on unlimited, so I don't give a rat's. :D
Mmm... what's a quota?
Can't tell, can you. ;)
Don't know, don't care. :D
Just funnin'. 8-)
To: mrbrad
On 02-02-20 20:44, mrbrad wrote to alt.bbs.synchronet <=-
mr> Sorry. Static IP with Spetrum in my area is $125 even a month.
Ouch, for me it only costs an extra $10/month for a single static IPv4 and a static /56 IPv6 prefix.
mr> Also I plan to run 'unsupported' bbs pkg (worldgroup and major bbs)
mr> maybe if i had the synchronet as a front end in that it has no major
mr> security problems I could pull that off. In that sbbs was updated
mr> 1/1/19.
"unsupported" by whom? In this context, I don't know what you mean.
mr> Static IP per say is mainly for the WG/MBBS/vitcom TCP/IP (static IP)
mr> ad other stuff like majormud and telearena etc.....a snarl of old wg
mr> bbs stuff.
OK, well static IP makes inbound connections easier.
mr> So yeah, it is spendy out here. Also have a Bitcoin Biz thus the static
mr> IP I can write the works off..ths static/ip biz line if I went this
mr> route.
Yep. :)
mr> I called spectrum they said they would be happy to do the separate
mr> router for the same fee as just picking up the other personal use $44
mr> buck variable IP personal inet line....so no redress there. Dubious
mr> security anyway. Or I could buy another router and split and like you
mr> said no real security improvement
mr> fun/fun. Anyway, no real time lately but I keep thinking about getting
mr> the lost gonzo bbs/nostaligia bbs back up but a lot of work for one
mr> guy.
mr> I'll just muddle through I guess, thanks for the help.
OK, I'm still a little confused about the end goal. It's still not really making sense, and it seems like you're doing this the long way around for reasons I don't understand.
... Interchangeable parts won't.
=== MultiMail/Win v0.51
--- SBBSecho 3.10-Linux
* Origin: Freeway BBS Bendigo,Australia freeway.apana.org.au (3:633/410) --- Synchronet 3.17c-Win32 NewsLink 1.111
* Vertrauen - Riverside County, California - telnet://vert.synchro.net
On 02-03-20 11:27, mrbrad wrote to alt.bbs.synchronet <=-
Major WG BBS uses vircom tcp/ip which requires (at least with a large a system I plan on putting up...even if boxes only in test mode till VM) again, really requires a static ip...or at least last I .looked the variable IP router cable hoops I'd jump through to get this to work is daunting.
Also I'm in a University town, the biz line static IP never goes down.
When I had regular cable with the rotating IP's etc it crashed like 4-8 times a month. That was unacceptable in that I was running Bitcoin
miners 24/7 in basement. Thus the static IP. Charter is only Inet in
town with any real reliability...thus their upkeep sucks being a university town and all, IMHO.
my question is with an unsupported BBS package on the internet even if
I use synchronet as the front end to such ...would I be better off just letting the bbs live/die on its own networks (static ip) and just pick
up the same speed home network (variable ip) at the same speed for $44 bucks to be safe. I would not give a damn if such was hacked.
I want to do synchronet as the front end, but that may be ugly as sin
to do initially, but that is the wise move in that the synrhonet
package had its last support date just updated with windows 10 on
1/1/19. Unlike my other mbbs/wg packages.
Anyway, thus the concerns. I don't much care if the for example if the static IP gets hacked via this BBS menagerie in some manner. But have personal and other use I could for just the heck of it spring the $44 bucks and just run on the cheap variable IP $44 option to be safe on
the side :) Thus the only security issues would be on the BBS's own
static IP line.
Hopefully this clears some stuff up. Also I looked at a port forwarding and security router thingy?
Was way over my head. Thus above option. Of course I also know, eventually, a lot of the above machines from back in the day can be compressed into VM...but first I have to get the large beast back up
and stable from backups.
my question is with an unsupported BBS package on the internet even if I
use synchronet as the front end to such ...would I be better off just
letting the bbs live/die on its own networks (static ip) and just pick
up the same speed home network (variable ip) at the same speed for $44
bucks to be safe. I would not give a damn if such was hacked.
To: mrbradI can say I'm using a mid-level (for a BBS) VPS on Digital Ocean ($20/month size). I first moved the SSH port to another port, and enabled that port in ufw before restarting
Re: Re: Questions about Synchronet BBS software -new topic- Static IP
By: mrbrad to alt.bbs.synchronet on Mon Feb 03 2020 11:27:24
my question is with an unsupported BBS package on the internet even if I
use synchronet as the front end to such ...would I be better off just
letting the bbs live/die on its own networks (static ip) and just pick
up the same speed home network (variable ip) at the same speed for $44
bucks to be safe. I would not give a damn if such was hacked.
I'm not sure what your intentions are... if you are just running Synchronet,
In any case, a linux host of even modest level can handle dozens of BBS userswithout issue. If you're stuck on majorbbs/wg, then you will afaik need a windows system to run it, and may still be better off with a windows VPS service, they can get
In short... I'd put it on a rented server in a datacenter, probably virtualto keep pricing down to reasonable.
--
Michael J. Ryan
+o roughneckbbs.com
bbs@tracker1.dev
---
� Synchronet � Roughneck BBS - coming back 2/2/20
--- Synchronet 3.17c-Win32 NewsLink 1.111
* Vertrauen - Riverside County, California - telnet://vert.synchro.net
I remember setting up RA, BinkleyTerm and whatever tosser I was using at the TL>time. It took me a couple of weeks to be confident enough to setup Fidonet TL>apply for a node number. I remember it was a steep learning curve at the ti TL>but so rewarding, once I got it all going!
On 02-05-20 07:44, Daryl Stout wrote to TONY LANGDON <=-
Mine was GT Power, then Virtual Advanced, and Synchronet...with all
the FIDONet utilities. You're right...it's a heck of a learning curve,
but it's rewarding when everything gets working properly.
Tony,
Mine was GT Power, then Virtual Advanced, and Synchronet...with all
the FIDONet utilities. You're right...it's a heck of a learning curve,
but it's rewarding when everything gets working properly.
Daryl
* OLX 1.53 * Black Holes: What you get in black socks.
--- SBBSecho 3.10-Win32
* Origin: The Thunderbolt BBS - tbolt.synchro.net (1:19/33)
Mine was GT Power, then Virtual Advanced, and Synchronet...with all the FIDONet utilities. You're right...it's a heck of a learning curve, but it's rewarding when everything gets working properly.
That's the real satisfaction in this hobby.
Virtual Advanced was pretty good but had to write a lot of batch files for i
On 02-12-20 21:03, Daryl Stout wrote to TONY LANGDON <=-
That's the real satisfaction in this hobby.
Plus, it's one of the few hobbies I can still do. I enjoy the
bantering in the message areas.
| Sysop: | sneaky |
|---|---|
| Location: | Ashburton,NZ |
| Users: | 31 |
| Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
| Uptime: | 88:23:56 |
| Calls: | 2,069 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 11,134 |
| Messages: | 946,757 |