I just rebuild today, and I'm noticing (only in DOVEnet), kludge lines:
eg:
@MSGID: <5D547BF7.5925.sync@vert.synchro.net>
@REPLY: <5D543E20.40467.dove_sync@digitaldistortionbbs.com>
@TZ: c1e0
On every message.
Did I do something to see those, or are you playing with something?
I dont see them in Fido echos.
It was a bug I added and subsequently fixed.
Hey DM,
I just rebuild today, and I'm noticing (only in DOVEnet), kludge lines:
eg:
@MSGID: <5D547BF7.5925.sync@vert.synchro.net>
@REPLY: <5D543E20.40467.dove_sync@digitaldistortionbbs.com>
@TZ: c1e0
On every message.
Did I do something to see those, or are you playing with something?
I dont see them in Fido echos.
|11SciNet |03ftn hq |08% |07https://diskshop.ca/scinetIt was a bug I added and subsequently fixed.
It's never a bug, it's always a feature, lol.
|15frank |08// |15netsurge
|07disksh0p|08!|07bbs |08% |07bbs.diskshop.ca |08% |07mystic goodness
It's never a bug, it's always a feature, lol.
I don't do DoveNet only Fido and I am seeing them on messages, not all, about half.
Re: Re: Kludge lines
By: Netsurge to Alterego on Wed Aug 14 2019 07:51 pm
I don't do DoveNet only Fido and I am seeing them on messages, not all, about half.
I'm seeing your message on Dove-Net though..
I'm seeing your message on Dove-Net though..
This sub-board (and a few others in DOVE-Net) are gated to FidoNet.
I'm seeing your message on Dove-Net though..
I don't do DoveNet only Fido and I am seeing them on messages, not
all, about half.
I'm seeing your message on Dove-Net though..
On 08-15-19 12:14, mark lewis wrote to Nightfox <=-
On 2019 Aug 14 21:12:12, you wrote to Netsurge:
I don't do DoveNet only Fido and I am seeing them on messages, not
all, about half.
I'm seeing your message on Dove-Net though..
because there are three or four of the synchronet areas that are gated between fidonet and dove-net...
because there are three or four of the synchronet areas that are gated
between fidonet and dove-net...
Really? I only know of two. :)
SYNCHRONET and SYNC_SYSOPS
On 08-16-19 10:10, mark lewis wrote to Tony Langdon <=-
On 2019 Aug 16 20:18:00, you wrote to me:
because there are three or four of the synchronet areas that are gated
between fidonet and dove-net...
Really? I only know of two. :)
SYNCHRONET and SYNC_SYSOPS
there's also SYNC_DATA and SYNC_PROGRAMMING...
max used the gated SYNC_DATA to keep her BBS list updated even though
she never configured to send her BBS information to the list...
SYNC_PROGRAMMING used to be gated by DM but there was a problem at one time with his upstream and the area got dropped by the NAB for lack of traffic OR because of an oversight... i tried to get it restored but
the NAB maintainer at that time didn't respond to my posts or data
showing the area had had traffic within the two or three year
monitoring period... at some point after that, Nick Boel (aka
Accession) started gating it (and other dove-net areas IIRC) to fidonet and also offering it as a FTN using Zone 723...
those are the only dove-net/synchronet related echos i'm aware of being available in fidonet...
On 08-16-19 10:10, mark lewis wrote to Tony Langdon <=-
On 2019 Aug 16 20:18:00, you wrote to me:
because there are three or four of the synchronet areas that are gated
between fidonet and dove-net...
Really? I only know of two. :)
SYNCHRONET and SYNC_SYSOPS
there's also SYNC_DATA and SYNC_PROGRAMMING...
max used the gated SYNC_DATA to keep her BBS list updated even though she never configured to send her BBS information to the list...
Ahh, OK. Hmm, I wonder which QWK conference SYNC_PROGRAMMING corresponds to, because there's a couple on the QWK side (one for JS/Baja and one for C/C++ issues).
On 08-16-19 15:48, Digital Man wrote to Tony Langdon <=-
The C/C++ one (it's the original Sync Programming conference).
| Sysop: | sneaky |
|---|---|
| Location: | Ashburton,NZ |
| Users: | 31 |
| Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
| Uptime: | 236:07:07 |
| Calls: | 2,088 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 11,140 |
| Messages: | 948,635 |