From Newsgroup: alt.bbs.synchronet
I'm puzzled. I joined DOVE-Net yesterday, successfully - I'm getting QWK packets of messages. Then I followed the instructions at http://wiki.synchro.net/module:dyndns
but I'm not able to connect to my BBS either by web or telnet. I can ping the DDNS hostname though (coffee.synchro.net) and it comes back with my
WAN (Internet) IP4 address, so it looks like DDNS is actually working.
I've forwarded TCP ports 21,22,23,80 and 513 in my router, which is a Linksys E-1200 v.2 running DD-WRT v.3.0-r31924 mega. I even tried putting
my PC in the DMZ. I've also disabled the firewall in PCLinuxOS, so I
should be wide open to the Internet at the moment (I'm not going to leave
it that way!) It's as though my services aren't binding to my external IP. (I can connect to my BBS via web by entering my internal LAN IP as the
URL.)
Any ideas?
To: charlie
Re: DDNS not working correctly By: charlie to alt.bbs.synchronet on
Fri Mar 02 2018 11:28 pm
From Newsgroup: alt.bbs.synchronet
I'm puzzled. I joined DOVE-Net yesterday, successfully - I'm getting
QWK packets of messages. Then I followed the instructions at http://wiki.synchro.net/module:dyndns but I'm not able to connect to
my BBS either by web or telnet. I can ping the DDNS hostname though (coffee.synchro.net) and it comes back with my WAN (Internet) IP4
address, so it looks like DDNS is actually working.
I've forwarded TCP ports 21,22,23,80 and 513 in my router, which is a Linksys E-1200 v.2 running DD-WRT v.3.0-r31924 mega. I even tried
putting my PC in the DMZ. I've also disabled the firewall in
PCLinuxOS, so I should be wide open to the Internet at the moment
(I'm not going to leave it that way!) It's as though my services
aren't binding to my external IP.
(I can connect to my BBS via web by entering my internal LAN IP as
the URL.)
Any ideas?
It could be that your router doesn't support hair-pinning, so you'd have
to use your local/private IP address to connect to your own servers in
that case.
Also see:
http://wiki.synchro.net/faq:tcpip#ports
There's a link there to a web page you can use to see what
servers/services you have open to the public Internet.
digital man
This Is Spinal Tap quote #13:
Nigel Tufnel: You can't really dust for vomit.
Norco, CA WX: 53.9°F, 86.0% humidity, 0 mph WSW wind, 0.00 inches
rain/24hrs --- Synchronet 3.17a-Win32 NewsLink 1.108
* Vertrauen - Riverside County, California - telnet://vert.synchro.net
I've forwarded TCP ports 21,22,23,80 and 513 in my router, which is a
Thank you very much. That's indeed what's happening. I'd never heard of "hairpinning" but apparently my router doesn't support it as I am able to log onto my board's web interface from another IP using Tor browser.
Thanks for the port scan utility. It's very helpful. I wonder why it
shows that telnet on port 23 fails even though I have that port
forwarded?
The telnet service must be running as I can telnet into my
board locally (using my local internal LAN IP.)
Thank you very much. That's indeed what's happening. I'd never heard of
"hairpinning" but apparently my router doesn't support it as I am able
to log onto my board's web interface from another IP using Tor browser.
Okay, cool. It doesn't hurt to just use your local/private IP address
(or localhost) when logging on locally, though it can be pain
sometimes for web testing where URLs might use hostnames.
... A bad day: "Transfer completed (5720468 bytes, 1 CPS)"
... A bad day: "Transfer completed (5720468 bytes, 1 CPS)"
I'm just lurking through some Echos today and saw Your Tagline and
wanted to let You know it "made my day"!
At the end I noticed that the Standard used wasn't HURTS (HZ) but
Cycles Per Second.
... A bad day: "Transfer completed (5720468 bytes, 1 CPS)"
I'm just lurking through some Echos today and saw Your Tagline and
wanted to let You know it "made my day"!
At the end I noticed that the Standard used wasn't HURTS (HZ)
but Cycles Per Second.
Good For You!
I supposed the Forcast that I saw on the TV Set was in Fahrenheidt
(sp?) but it was Centigrade instead. BAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
If that Private TV Channel had put a C after the Low of 11 I wouldn't
had gotten so confused, and mentioned to others in the Waiting Room
how Cold it was going to be.
... If you live in Hawaii, where do you go on vacation??
@VIA: VERT
@MSGID: <5A9E5185.74120.sync@vert.synchro.net>
@REPLY: <5A9DF028.24274.sync@capitolcityonline.net>
Re: DDNS not working correctl
By: Ed Vance to mark lewis on Sun Mar 04 2018 05:22 pm
... A bad day: "Transfer completed (5720468 bytes, 1 CPS)"
I'm just lurking through some Echos today and saw Your Tagline and
wanted to let You know it "made my day"!
At the end I noticed that the Standard used wasn't HURTS (HZ) but
Cycles Per Second.
I read that as characters (bytes) per second. <shrug>
Digital Man wrote to Ed Vance <=-
... A bad day: "Transfer completed (5720468 bytes, 1 CPS)"
At the end I noticed that the Standard used wasn't HURTS (HZ) but
Cycles Per Second.
I read that as characters (bytes) per second. <shrug>
@VIA: VERT
@MSGID: <5A9E9991.74123.sync@vert.synchro.net>
On 2018 Mar 04 17:22:00, you wrote to me:
... A bad day: "Transfer completed (5720468 bytes, 1 CPS)"
I'm just lurking through some Echos today and saw Your Tagline and
wanted to let You know it "made my day"!
At the end I noticed that the Standard used wasn't HURTS (HZ)
yup... especially since it is talking about bytes transferred ;)
but Cycles Per Second.
characters per second, actually...
At the end I noticed that the Standard used wasn't HURTS (HZ) but
Cycles Per Second.
I read that as characters (bytes) per second. <shrug>
So did I, given that it was a data transfer rate, which was never measured in Hz (or cycles per second). But characters per second was very common back in the day.
At the end I noticed that the Standard used wasn't HURTS (HZ) but
Cycles Per Second.
At the end I noticed that the Standard used wasn't HURTS (HZ)
yup... especially since it is talking about bytes transferred ;)
but Cycles Per Second.
characters per second, actually...
I'm learning about that, first DM, now You. Who else??????
Isn't it actually spelled Hertz?
When your CPU shocks you, on the other hand, it mega-hurts..
Nightfox wrote to Tony Langdon <=-
Yeah, cycles per second/Hz doesn't really make sense for a data
transfer rate.. I was familiar with characters per second.
@VIA: VERT/DIGDIST
@MSGID: <5AA0242F.33642.dove_sync@digitaldistortionbbs.com>
@REPLY: <5A9DF028.24274.sync@capitolcityonline.net>
Re: DDNS not working correctl
By: Ed Vance to mark lewis on Sun Mar 04 2018 05:22 pm
At the end I noticed that the Standard used wasn't HURTS (HZ) but
Cycles Per Second.
Isn't it actually spelled Hertz?
When your CPU shocks you, on the other hand, it mega-hurts..
@VIA: VERT
@MSGID: <5AA0383C.74148.sync@vert.synchro.net>
On 2018 Mar 06 22:15:00, you wrote to me:
At the end I noticed that the Standard used wasn't HURTS (HZ)
yup... especially since it is talking about bytes transferred ;)
but Cycles Per Second.
characters per second, actually...
I'm learning about that, first DM, now You. Who else??????
you're OK, ed :)
... Expert advice is a great comfort, even when it's wrong.
At the end I noticed that the Standard used wasn't HURTS (HZ) but
Cycles Per Second.
Isn't it actually spelled Hertz?
The Persons name is spelled that way.
I'm learning about that, first DM, now You. Who else??????
you're OK, ed :)
... Expert advice is a great comfort, even when it's wrong.
The computer didn't select a Random Tagline this time, did it? ? ??? ??? ? ?
Sysop: | sneaky |
---|---|
Location: | Ashburton,NZ |
Users: | 31 |
Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
Uptime: | 214:34:25 |
Calls: | 2,086 |
Calls today: | 4 |
Files: | 11,139 |
Messages: | 948,208 |