Yes, it was the same "test" subject. Just odd since I replied to the
whole newsgroup instead of anyone in that thread. Don't want anyone
coming down on me for reviving old threads. :)
test
FYI, when I view this test message via ECweb, it appears as a reply to another message: test From bytor@VERT to alt.bbs.synchronet on Thu Jun
13 20:36:00 2013
Also there appears to be 3 message threads with latest reply from 2015
at the top of the of the Synchronet Discussion and then the rest appear
to be in order by date from today back.
Re: Odd ECweb Threading (was Re: test)
By: Mindless Automaton to Mindless Automaton on Fri Oct 26 2018 12:23:33
MA> FYI, when I view this test message via ECweb, it appears as a reply to
MA> another message: test From bytor@VERT to alt.bbs.synchronet on Thu Jun
MA> 13 20:36:00 2013
Does that other message have the same subject? Because of inconsistent
MA> Also there appears to be 3 message threads with latest reply from 2015
MA> at the top of the of the Synchronet Discussion and then the rest appear
MA> to be in order by date from today back.
Yeah, that's weird. They're supposed to be sorted by the date of the newest message in the thread. I'll see if I can figure that one out.
Also there appears to be 3 message threads with latest reply from
2015 at the top of the of the Synchronet Discussion and then the
rest appear to be in order by date from today back.
Yeah, that's weird. They're supposed to be sorted by the date of the newest message in the thread. I'll see if I can figure that one out.
I've seen that on my BBS sometimes too, where on ecweb, the messages at the top are older ones.
whole newsgroup instead of anyone in that thread. Don't want anyone
coming down on me for reviving old threads. :)
Re: Re: Odd ECweb Threading (was Re: test)
By: Mindless Automaton to echicken on Fri Oct 26 2018 02:59 pm
whole newsgroup instead of anyone in that thread. Don't want anyone coming down on me for reviving old threads. :)
I don't really see a problem with reviving an old thread, if you have something new to ask or contribute. People often seem to react like reviving an old thread is against the law or something..
Nightfox
On 10/26/2018 1:34 PM, echicken wrote:
Re: Odd ECweb Threading (was Re: test)
By: Mindless Automaton to Mindless Automaton on Fri Oct 26 2018 12:23:33
MA> FYI, when I view this test message via ECweb, it appears as a reply to
MA> another message: test From bytor@VERT to alt.bbs.synchronet on Thu Jun
MA> 13 20:36:00 2013
Does that other message have the same subject? Because of inconsistent
Yes, it was the same "test" subject. Just odd since I replied to the
whole newsgroup instead of anyone in that thread. Don't want anyone
coming down on me for reviving old threads. :)
On 10-26-18 14:50, Nightfox wrote to Mindless Automaton <=-
I don't really see a problem with reviving an old thread, if you have something new to ask or contribute. People often seem to react like reviving an old thread is against the law or something..
I don't really see a problem with reviving an old thread, if you have something new to ask or contribute. People often seem to react like reviving an old thread is against the law or something..
My wife has a closet full of jeans if you're interested in reviving old threads :-P
On 10-27-18 12:06, MRO wrote to Nightfox <=-
if there's a good reason, sure. otherwise it's against the law.
On 10-27-18 12:06, MRO wrote to Nightfox <=-
if there's a good reason, sure. otherwise it's against the law.
In that case, you'd better quote the Act and Regulations, with links for verification. ;)
On 10-27-18 22:30, MRO wrote to Tony Langdon <=-
nope, you have to take my word for it. i have a lot of bbs botnets,
you know. -
| Sysop: | sneaky |
|---|---|
| Location: | Ashburton,NZ |
| Users: | 31 |
| Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
| Uptime: | 102:22:24 |
| Calls: | 2,071 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 11,134 |
| Messages: | 947,018 |