I was asking a couple of weeks back about the binkd outboxes. I got the impression that you might be running both binkd and binkit on the same box in order to use the binkd outbox feature to move files.
No, I just run binkit. I have thought of that and I think that is doable but >the very few times I could use an outbox I just write the path and filename to >the flofile (.flo/.clo/.hlo/.dlo) in the outbound. In my case to send a file to
1:153/6809 I would enter this in 00991a99.clo in my outbound..
You can get the base name of a flo file from the linked nodes list in echocfg >between the node number and name in brackets. It needs to go in the correct >outbound directory for the zone the node is in.
No, I just run binkit. I have thought of that and I think that is doable but >the very few times I could use an outbox I just write the path and filename to >the flofile (.flo/.clo/.hlo/.dlo) in the outbound. In my case to send a file to
1:153/6809 I would enter this in 00991a99.clo in my outbound..
Ah, ok, I misunderstood. You know, I was thinking that would be manual
work but I bet I could write a script to check for the presence of a file and, if found, create/append the flofile with the info I want appended.
You can get the base name of a flo file from the linked nodes list in echocfg >between the node number and name in brackets. It needs to go in the correct >outbound directory for the zone the node is in.
Thanks, I had seen that before. Is that the name of the flo file, or the name of the "packet" files (i.e. name.TH0, name.FR0, etc.)? I was not sure.
Ah, ok, I misunderstood. You know, I was thinking that would be manual work but I bet I could write a script to check for the presence of a file and, if found, create/append the flofile with the info I want appended.
Thanks, I had seen that before. Is that the name of the flo file, or the name of the "packet" files (i.e. name.TH0, name.FR0, etc.)? I was not sure.
Easy using the >> output redirection in shells like BASH. That creates the file if it doesn't exist, and appends otherwise. I think it works in DOS/Windows too.
I was asking a couple of weeks back about the binkd outboxes. I got the impression that you might be running both binkd and binkit on the same box in order to use the binkd outbox feature to move files.
No, I just run binkit. I have thought of that and I think that is doable but the very few times I could use an outbox I just write the path and filename to the flofile (.flo/.clo/.hlo/.dlo) in the outbound. In my case to send a file to 1:153/6809 I would enter this in 00991a99.clo in my outbound..
/sbbs/data/dirs/fido/nasa/AP180724.ZIP
Or to delete the file once it is sent..
^/sbbs/xtrn/gdyn/out/ibbs0001.zip
So far that has been enough for me but I am still hoping we will get filebox support in binkit at some point.
On 07-25-18 15:45, Al wrote to Dumas Walker <=-
Ah, ok, I misunderstood. You know, I was thinking that would be manual work but I bet I could write a script to check for the presence of a file and, if found, create/append the flofile with the info I want appended.
That part is a bit tricky in a script. You'll want to be sure to append
to an existing flofile and not overwrite it.. :)
On 07-26-18 15:38, Nightfox wrote to Tony Langdon <=-
Yes, DOS/Windows uses that too. You can also do 2>&1 to also redirect standard error to the file as well (otherwise, you'll have standard
output going to the file and error messages going to the screen). Specifically, 2>&1 redirects standard error to the same place where
you're redirecting standard output.
Hi Digital Man
(me)
I sent message to support per my Refector troubles
try to explain want I was tring to do per 1stchoicecore.co.nz
and bbs mail got same thing back I don't understand but you might ---------------------------------------------------------------------- (support)
mail Reflector is not an OUTBOUND service, and only directs inbound emails based on the MX records being setup properly for us to receive it, and then the reflector service setup with a hostname (or IP address) to forward the email to, using any port number. ------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------- (me)
I am unsure if from my eundora (private Account) to sneaky@1stchoicecore.co.nz is outbound or inbound I would od thought it would be inboundbut I could be wrong. -------------------------------------- --------------------------------------- (support)
The hostname "mail.1stchoicecore.co.nz " is currently setup within the reflector service as the "server" to send email to. This hostnames needs to be created and resolve to your public IP address to receive emails ----------------------------------------------------------------
(me)
maybe you might understand this as i don't
maybe I have the wrong service maybe it mail forwarding I am After or not.
Thank you
Re: Refector no-ip support
The hostname "mail.1stchoicecore.co.nz " is currently setup within the reflector service as the "server" to send email to. This hostnames needs to be created and resolve to your public IP address to receive emails ----------------------------------------------------------------
(me)
maybe you might understand this as i don't
maybe I have the wrong service maybe it mail forwarding I am After or not.
Thank you
Sneaky, 1stchoicecore.co.nz is your BBS right? I connected to it via HTTP(web). Change your configuration on in the mail reflector to send
mail to just 1stchoicecore.co.nz instead of mail.1stchoicecore.co.nz.
That should fix it.
Lord Time wrote to Al on 07-26-18 16:05 <=-
I was asking a couple of weeks back about the binkd outboxes. I got the impression that you might be running both binkd and binkit on the same box in order to use the binkd outbox feature to move files.
No, I just run binkit. I have thought of that and I think that is doable but the very few times I could use an outbox I just write the path and filename to the flofile (.flo/.clo/.hlo/.dlo) in the outbound. In my case to send a file to 1:153/6809 I would enter this in 00991a99.clo in my outbound..
/sbbs/data/dirs/fido/nasa/AP180724.ZIP
Or to delete the file once it is sent..
^/sbbs/xtrn/gdyn/out/ibbs0001.zip
So far that has been enough for me but I am still hoping we will get filebox support in binkit at some point.
I wish we would and I can name one other person who wants it too (being both of us are a hub level bbs, for a few nets)
I wish we would and I can name one other person who wants it too (being both of us are a hub level bbs, for a few nets)
Ah, ok, I misunderstood. You know, I was thinking that would be
manual work but I bet I could write a script to check for the
presence of a file and, if found, create/append the flofile with the
info I want appended.
That part is a bit tricky in a script. You'll want to be sure to
append to an existing flofile and not overwrite it.. :)
Easy using the >> output redirection in shells like BASH. That
creates the file if it doesn't exist, and appends otherwise. I think
it works in DOS/Windows too.
So far that has been enough for me but I am still hoping we will get
filebox support in binkit at some point.
I wish we would and I can name one other person who wants it too
(being both of us are a hub level bbs, for a few nets)
That totally depends on who is hatching the file. I use htick to hatch files and in my config I use the option '-replace' which, when your processor process the tic, it will delete the old file and replace it
with the new one.
just a question no-ip.com support suggested I went to "pop3 imap
email" service would that direct mail to my bbs or not.
mark lewis wrote to Bill McGarrity on 08-03-18 16:21 <=-
On 2018 Jul 30 08:32:00, you wrote to Lord Time:
So far that has been enough for me but I am still hoping we will get
filebox support in binkit at some point.
I wish we would and I can name one other person who wants it too
(being both of us are a hub level bbs, for a few nets)
That totally depends on who is hatching the file. I use htick to hatch files and in my config I use the option '-replace' which, when your processor process the tic, it will delete the old file and replace it
with the new one.
i thought LT was talking about getting fileboxes... i know they can
make things much easier for sending some of those interBBS door game packets... many of those assume frontdoor style fileattach mail and BSO doesn't do that without some assistance... in any case, tic options
when hatching don't have anything to do with BSO fileboxes, AFAIK...
On 08-03-18 16:40, mark lewis wrote to Tony Langdon <=-
i think the tricky part he was talking about is figuring out the ?LO file's basename... it is hella tricky AFAIK... my 4DOS/4OS2 and bash scripts say so ;) :lol:
i thought LT was talking about getting fileboxes... i know they can
make things much easier for sending some of those interBBS door game
packets... many of those assume frontdoor style fileattach mail and
BSO doesn't do that without some assistance... in any case, tic
options when hatching don't have anything to do with BSO fileboxes,
AFAIK...
Oh.. my apologies then.
just a question no-ip.com support suggested I went to "pop3 imap
email" service would that direct mail to my bbs or not.
no! those are end user choices... not server-to-server...
whomever offered those options apparently didn't understand your problem,
either...
i think the tricky part he was talking about is figuring out the ?LO
file's basename... it is hella tricky AFAIK... my 4DOS/4OS2 and bash
scripts say so ;) :lol:
Yeah that would be a little tricky - some decimal to hex conversion
there. :)
On 08-04-18 17:50, mark lewis wrote to Tony Langdon <=-
the real tricky part is the checking for and creating if needed of the
BSO directories that's the tough part... especially if you're doing 4D
or 5D which makes a big difference... then destination points'
directories have to be managed under their boss' out.zzz/xxxxyyyy directory as pppppppp.pnt... it can be real fun to code... i've only
done 5D style because nothing i have requires 4D where i have this code
in place...
mark lewis wrote to Bill McGarrity on 08-04-18 17:22 <=-
Oh.. my apologies then.
you don't need to apologize to me... i will take another beverage,
though O:)
the real tricky part is the checking for and creating if needed of
the BSO directories that's the tough part... especially if you're
doing 4D or 5D which makes a big difference... then destination
points' directories have to be managed under their boss'
out.zzz/xxxxyyyy directory as pppppppp.pnt... it can be real fun to
code... i've only done 5D style because nothing i have requires 4D
where i have this code in place...
Should be fairly straightforward in Linux, though I haven't tried. No idea in $DOS/4OS2, because I haven't used those for 15+ year. I used
to love 4DOS back in the day. I do all sorts of clever path
manipulation in BASH. :)
On 08-06-18 16:14, mark lewis wrote to Tony Langdon <=-
didn't i send you my poll or freq script some time back? the code is in there because the same determinations need to be made as to where to create the poll ?LO file and what its name is as well as creating the
freq data file, too... they're real close in form...
Oh.. my apologies then.
you don't need to apologize to me... i will take another beverage,
though O:)
Guinness??
didn't i send you my poll or freq script some time back? the code is
in there because the same determinations need to be made as to where
to create the poll ?LO file and what its name is as well as creating
the freq data file, too... they're real close in form...
Hmm, I'm not sure. I know I was going to write one, but never got
around to it. Or it was one of those things that got lost.
wrapped... oh well... if someone wants it, they can ask ;)
I would be interested, as I never got round to writing my FREQ script. :)
On 08-06-18 21:02, mark lewis wrote to Tony Langdon <=-
it may have been one of the pauls that i sent it to... i remember
posting it in one of these echos with a warning about long lines being wrapped... oh well... if someone wants it, they can ask ;)
Just FREQ "MFREQ" from my main system (#384). They may need
fine-tuning for your system, too.
Umm, there is a bit of a Catch-22 there! :)
On 08-08-18 09:14, Paul Quinn wrote to Tony Langdon <=-
Oops. I always assume people have these functions in their mailer(s).
(I can do FREQs and file sending with a few mouse clicks in my Radius doover.) AAMOF I FREQ-ed a possible new release of MFREQ from Markus' joint, which was forwarded to yours inside of a minute.
Anyhow... check your insecure inbound. Enjoy. 8-)
On 08-07-18 17:13, Paul Quinn wrote to Tony Langdon <=-
No need. That wheel has already been invented by Markus Reschke, as a part of his MFreq package for binkD. There's also a matching
'sendfile' script.
Just FREQ "MFREQ" from my main system (#384). They may need
fine-tuning for your system, too.
joint, which was forwarded to yours inside of a minute.
If I could do that, I wouldn't be looking for a simple way to do it! :D
On 08-08-18 17:04, Paul Quinn wrote to Tony Langdon <=-
Hi! Tony,
On 08/08/2018 12:01 PM, you wrote:
joint, which was forwarded to yours inside of a minute.
Ahmm... I was the victim of a relativistic gravity well this AM. After checking the logs, I found it took me 2 minutes four seconds. At the
time it went whee!-whoosh! and was done. :)
If I could do that, I wouldn't be looking for a simple way to do it! :D
The only downside with Radius is that to do an automated FREQ via its
cron would be possible but a mind-bending exercise. OTOH, using
Markus' tool for such a job on my Linux box via binkD would be a *snap* (and which is essentially extra bling in his package). That's a
priority #99 job for my todo list now. ;)
| Sysop: | sneaky |
|---|---|
| Location: | Ashburton,NZ |
| Users: | 31 |
| Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
| Uptime: | 92:32:30 |
| Calls: | 2,070 |
| Calls today: | 3 |
| Files: | 11,134 |
| Messages: | 946,853 |