paul, can you please help greg with the following problem... he has a fsxnet address and i don't know what name he is going by there... i
cannot deliver mail to his system and he doesn't poll here on a regular schedule... as such, i cannot answer his requests in a timely manner :(
please turn off that forced secure sessions option in your mystic
binkp server options and only set it in the individual system
records... we talked about this over a year ago in one or two
different echos and then you stopped responding...
+ 12:03 [32723] call to 1:123/130@fidonet
12:03 [32723] trying afterhours-bbs.com [76.4.139.59]...
12:03 [32723] connected
+ 12:03 [32723] outgoing session with afterhours-bbs.com:24554 [76.4.139.59]
- 12:03 [32723] OPT TLS CRAM-MD5-794331cd45959d985ecce6470c5326e1
+ 12:03 [32723] Remote requests MD mode
- 12:03 [32723] SYS After Hours BBS
- 12:03 [32723] ZYZ Greg Youngblood
- 12:03 [32723] TIME Thu, 05 Sep 2019 12:03:24 -0400
- 12:03 [32723] VER Mystic/1.12A43 binkp/1.0
- 12:03 [32723] BUILD 2019/03/03 01:35:01 Windows/32
+ 12:03 [32723] addr: 1:123/130@fidonet
+ 12:03 [32723] addr: 21:4/119@fsxnet
+ 12:03 [32723] addr: 314:314/150@pinet
+ 12:03 [32723] addr: 169:1/114@battlnet
+ 12:03 [32723] addr: 80:774/65@retronet
+ 12:03 [32723] addr: 700:100/23@spooknet
+ 12:03 [32723] addr: 44:100/22@dorenet
+ 12:03 [32723] addr: 618:250/23@micronet
+ 12:03 [32723] addr: 618:250/123@micronet
? 12:03 [32723] rerror: Unsecured session not allowed
+ 12:03 [32723] holding 1:123/130@fidonet (2019/09/05 12:13:27)
+ 12:03 [32723] done (to 1:123/130@fidonet, failed, S/R: 0/0 (0/0
bytes))
12:03 [32723] session closed, quitting... 12:03 [2245] rc(32723)=0
please fix asap...
paul, can you please help greg with the following problem... he has a
fsxnet address and i don't know what name he is going by there... i
cannot deliver mail to his system and he doesn't poll here on a
regular schedule... as such, i cannot answer his requests in a timely
manner :(
I've dropped him a note in an othernet pointing to your post here and explained the rationale behind the request to change the setting. Will keep
you posted on how I get on. I agree it would be good to get it changed.
while it was a good idea, i kinda wish that g00r00 had not implemented
it in the server section and left it only to the individual node
settings because of the breakage of random connectivity which FTNs are based on... it completely breaks the ability for some unknown system to deliver netmail directly... but hindsight is 20/20...
Sysop: | sneaky |
---|---|
Location: | Ashburton,NZ |
Users: | 25 |
Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
Uptime: | 250:25:28 |
Calls: | 1,886 |
Calls today: | 2 |
Files: | 11,073 |
Messages: | 933,848 |