Nightfox wrote to MIKE POWELL <=-
I don't know why but, in comparison to today's internet and social media, I feel now that we are a lot less likely to be exposed to rampant misinformation back then.
I've heard people say that misinformation has multiplied as more and
more people have gotten internet access. Even though many people have access to factual information online, it's also very easy for people to spread misinformation to a lot of people online.
MIKE POWELL wrote to NIGHTFOX <=-
I feel like that has to do with people gravitating to social media
sites, especially those that echo their own beliefs, for social interaction that they don't get on news sites.
poindexter FORTRAN wrote to StormTrooper <=-
I know I've told this story before, but I worked in a company with a mixture of Mac and Windows PCs back in the '90s. We used a LAN-based
email system called Quickmail and needed 3 or 4 servers to support 70 clients.
poindexter FORTRAN wrote to Utopian Galt <=-
Utopian Galt wrote to Bob Worm <=-
Yeah, amatuer radio has more of a potential to grow than bbsing.
I'm surprised CB radio isn't hanging on more with the truckers. I took
a long trip up I-80 and was expecting to see CB antennas on trucks like
I did when I was a kid - only the odd truck had a visible CB antenna.
It seems like such a great way to pass time with whoever's around you
when you're on the road - especially when trying to get traffic and
road conditions.
Nightfox wrote to poindexter FORTRAN <=-
I'm surprised CB radio isn't hanging on more with the truckers. I took a long trip up I-80 and was expecting to see CB antennas on trucks like I did when I was a kid - only the odd truck had a visible CB antenna.
It seems like such a great way to pass time with whoever's around you when you're on the road - especially when trying to get traffic and road conditions.
Maybe truckers have other things now with smartphones. I wonder if there's a smartphone app that provides something similar to CB radio,
with different voice chat channels on some central server(s).. Also, I imagine there are smartphone apps that could provide voice-controlled games you could play (trivia games, Q&A guessing games, etc.).
tenser wrote to Bob Worm <=-
Hear, hear. Also, the emphasis on HF as the end-all, be-all
of the hobby. "Why aren't people upgrading?!" When I suggest
that people ask new hams why they don't upgrade, they just
look at me funny. It's like a completely foreign concept to
them or something.
Bob Worm wrote to tenser <=-
Given that, I'm not about to throw a couple of grand at a radio, tuner, test kit, etc. just to see if I get on with it - especially since a lot
of HF work just seems to be hello, swap call sign / location / signal strength, maybe kit list, then goodbye. Everyone is entitled to enjoy radio in their own way but that's not my kind of fun.
halian wrote to Bob Worm <=-
This is the boat I'm in. I think ham radio is pretty neat, and got the Amateur Radio badge when I was in the Boy Scouts, but I don't have the money or brain space to actually get into amateur radio.
JIMMY ANDERSON (21:2/127) wrote to MIKE POWELL <=-I try my best not to push people away, but still try to be authentic without censoring myself too much.
People like echo chambers... I like to talk to like minded people
too, but we never learn or grow if we aren't challenged.
That is one way MS Windows got to be so popular. Most PC makers pretty much had to include it on their machines.
Utopian Galt wrote to Jimmy Anderson <=-
JIMMY ANDERSON (21:2/127) wrote to MIKE POWELL <=-
People like echo chambers... I like to talk to like minded people
too, but we never learn or grow if we aren't challenged.
I try my best not to push people away, but still try to be authentic without censoring myself too much.
MIKE POWELL wrote to JIMMY ANDERSON <=-
`-[JA=>M]
That is one way MS Windows got to be so popular. Most PC makers pretty much had to include it on their machines.
I've heard people say that misinformation has multiplied as more and more people have gotten internet access. Even though many people have
Jimmy Anderson wrote to MIKE POWELL <=-
That is one way MS Windows got to be so popular. Most PC makers pretty much had to include it on their machines.
Or else they could't be competitive with their prices. Yep.
Alonzo wrote to Jimmy Anderson <=-have
I've heard people say that misinformation has multiplied as more and more people have gotten internet access. Even though many people
It just makes sense that the more information you have, the more
likely a lot of it will be misinformation. We are exposed to
so much info now, there is a lot of misinformation. It just goes
along with the good information.
poindexter FORTRAN wrote to Jimmy Anderson <=-
Then, Windows got so big that they required makers to purchase a
license per system or they wouldn't sell you any license at all.
Let's not forget people who went through the hoops of trying to get a refund on a shrinkwrap license of Windows when they installed another
OS.
It was the same rationale that the RIAA used to get the courts to order makers of blank CDs to pay into a fund for the recording industry
because users could possibly use blank CDs to copy music (which was
legal under copyright, but details...)
That is one way MS Windows got to be so popular. Most PC makers pretty much had to include it on their machines.
I heard that Microsoft would charge PC makers a Windows license for each PC they sold, even if they installed a different OS on a PC. Seems a bit sketchy
to me.. But I've heard some people say that was volume licensing, which may b
a somewhat different thing.
Sysop: | sneaky |
---|---|
Location: | Ashburton,NZ |
Users: | 31 |
Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
Uptime: | 171:33:51 |
Calls: | 2,077 |
Files: | 11,137 |
Messages: | 947,321 |