Check out my site for Black Flag: http://blackflag.acid.org
It's not particularly faithful to the HTTP standard, unfortunately. Oh well.
It's not particularly faithful to the HTTP standard, unfortunately. O well.
It also just got put into the project. It's also Alpha software.
It's not particularly faithful to the HTTP standard, unfortunately. Oh well.
It's not particularly faithful to the HTTP standard, unfortunately. Oh well.
No one wants to deal with a problematic know-it-all who is a constant downer, and no one wants constant negativity in this echo. If you can't be cool, just don't be here. I am pretty sure I can speak for everyone here in that regard.
On 04/25/18, tenser said the following...
It's not particularly faithful to the HTTP standard, unfortunately. O well.
I haven't encountered any issues relating to the protocol itself so far. What exactly is noncompliant?
Similarly for POST. Indeed, mystic seems to treat ANY message sent as a GET request for the second whitespace-separated token.
Sorry another question, what you were talking about yesterday a in stone kind of thing %+ALL
Be nice for all bbs software to have a standard, like VBBS it does it on it's own as you pick your areas, with Wildcat it was just a * in the
body.
Again, looking forward to it if so....
Huh. You could have just asked, "well, what's wrong with it?" and I would have honestly answered. Among other things, it returns the the message
specifically, but you've chosen to take what I say in the worst possible
know what to tell you. If you want to have a technical dialogue, I'm
happy to do that; I've implemented web servers before.
In the meanwhile, Physician, heal thyself.
%ALL is in A39 :)
Why on earth do you think I should ask you anything? I've very clearly explained that its alpha, its been in Mystic alpha for only 4 days, and its not finished. Several others have told you the same thing.
The server responds with GET because only GET is implemented. Clearly I know what it does and doesn't do *because I created it*. Why do you not seem to understand that?
We've been down this road before. You don't even use Mystic and your
blend of "help" in this case is clearly spiteful (and is historically
this way).
Thanks for the offer, but I've not asked for technical dialog with you.
I don't see where there is any indication that I need it, and I think
I've been clear with you.
[snip detailed explanation of your experience with web stuff]
And not for fun. For IBM.
Why on earth do you think I should ask you anything? I've very clear explained that its alpha, its been in Mystic alpha for only 4 days, a its not finished. Several others have told you the same thing.Seems to me that if you put software on the public Internet, you have
some responsibility to make sure it works correctly with respect to the
Seems to me that if you put software on the public Internet, you have
some responsibility to make sure it works correctly with respect to the relevant standard.
dude it's an alpha. it's out there for testing
Half of github would need to be taken down if that were the case. The
only thing you're really responsible for is making sure you're not doing anything illegal. As tidy as it would be for all publicly posted
software to be feature complete and standards compliant that would mean
no early or in-progress access.
Seems to me that if you put software on the public Internet, you have
some responsibility to make sure it works correctly with respect to
the relevant standard. If someone says, "hey, this doesn't work right" then instead of defensively lashing out against that person, you could
ask them what's wrong with it. You clearly aren't interested in that, though, so I'm sorry I bothered trying.
Seems to me that if you put software on the public Internet, you have
some responsibility to make sure it works correctly with respect to the
Thanks for the offer, but I've not asked for technical dialog with yo I don't see where there is any indication that I need it, and I think I've been clear with you.
I see. Sorry I sent in a problem report with your software, then.
It's amazing how you feel license to tell me what's in my head.
dude it's an alpha. it's out there for testing
Yup. I tested it, found a bug, reported.
anything illegal. As tidy as it would be for all publicly posted
software to be feature complete and standards compliant that would mean
no early or in-progress access.
dude it's an alpha. it's out there for testing
If you truly believe your one line comment about Mystic being broken (posted to someone else not even me) was you "being helpful and
providing a bug report" (your words), then I can only say that there is
a reality, and there is what your massively warped version of reality.
I think I speak for everyone here. You Rock and are Great!
You posted a one line message to Hawk to trash the web server because he said it works nice (see subject) and now you're trying to bend truth so that everyone is wrong or the bad guy. THIS. IS. WHAT. YOU. ALWAYS. DO.
interacting with you is not useful. So, very well, I won't do
so anymore. Certainly not on fsxNet, which you seem to feel
you have some "ownership" of and hopefully nowhere else, either.
It's a waste of my time, and evidently of yours as well.
It's sad that this place would rather have technical inaccuracies
stand in its archives than be corrected so that people can benefit
and use it as a learning resource, but there it is.
On 04/26/18, dream master said the following...
dude it's an alpha. it's out there for testingYup. I tested it, found a bug, reported.
dude it's an alpha. it's out there for testingSome test so far everything seems stable as h*ll!
yeah and can't wait for more features added such as ssi for cgi-bin
Static wrote to tenser <=-
On 04/26/18, tenser said the following...
Seems to me that if you put software on the public Internet, you have
some responsibility to make sure it works correctly with respect to the relevant standard.
Half of github would need to be taken down if that were the case. The
only thing you're really responsible for is making sure you're not
doing anything illegal. As tidy as it would be for all publicly posted software to be feature complete and standards compliant that would mean
no early or in-progress access.
In the maybe, 10 or so messages I have ever exchanged with you have,
You're just not happy, unless you've had the last word are you? I've
read this entire thread between you and g00r00, and I 100% agree with
him, you're just being a troll. You're not happy unless you're
upsetting the apple cart. You feel the utmost need to make your point heard, and make yourself stand out among the crowd. I think this
entire thing should either be dropped or taken to netmail, so that I
don't have to read this crap anymore.
You're just not happy, unless you've had the last word are you? I've read this entire thread between you and g00r00, and I 100% agree with him, you're just being a troll. You're not happy unless you're upsetting the apple cart. You feel the utmost need to make your point heard, and make yourself stand out among the crowd. I think this entire thing should either be dropped or taken to netmail, so that I don't have to read this crap anymore.
Have a day.
No one wants to deal with a problematic know-it-all who is a constant downer, and no one wants constant negativity in this echo. If you can't be cool, just don't be here. I am pretty sure I can speak for everyone here in that regard.
I think this entire thing should
either be dropped or taken to netmail, so that I don't have to read this
All I have to say about this whole thing... YOU ROCK g00r00! All of the hard work you do on Mystic is very much appreciated by all of us.
Simply ignore the people that want to Trash-Talk the work you do without ever using it.
I think I speak for everyone here. You Rock and are Great!
In the maybe, 10 or so messages I have ever exchanged with you have,
1. Called me an idiot.
2. Repeatedly questioned my professionalism and experience.
4. Told me that my "skills" are inferior to yours.
5. Tried to impress me with your high school, collegiate, and
professional experience in the Pentagon and at IBM.
6. Accused me of having some personal vendetta against you.
7. Accused me of "trash-talking" your software because I pointed
out that it contains demonstrable bugs.
8. Suggested that I'm the type of guy who gets beat up by LARPers
(which was actually mildly funny, but still...).
9. Suggested that I don't "run a real BBS" (as if that's some
indicator of technical worth... Nevermind that I run public
access Unix systems with tens of thousands of users).
A. Told me to "be cool" and "chill" while not doing so yourself.
I do not want to keep this going and I have a lot going on right now.
But it helps to leave things on a positive note. :)
For everyone here: Mystic is officially on hiatus. Sorry guys :(
Why on earth do you think I should ask you anything? I've very clear explained that its alpha, its been in Mystic alpha for only 4 days, a its not finished. Several others have told you the same thing.
Seems to me that if you put software on the public Internet, you have
some responsibility to make sure it works correctly with respect to the
relevant standard. If someone says, "hey, this doesn't work right" then instead of defensively lashing out against that person, you could ask
them what's wrong with it. You clearly aren't interested in that, though, so I'm sorry I bothered trying.
For everyone here: Mystic is officially on hiatus. Sorry guys :(
You're most welcome to post in fsxNet is you want to continue to do so. I just ask (like I do of everyone active in the network) that you do so respectfully and in the spirit of having fun and being helpful. Refer my post in FSX_GEN if you're not sure what I'm going on about :)
I have responded in this thread before I saw your post. Please
disregard it.
I do not want to keep this going and I have a lot going on right now.
But it helps to leave things on a positive note. :)
For everyone here: Mystic is officially on hiatus. Sorry guys :(
I think everyone appreciates that we're all juggling other demands in our daily lives. I agree with Gary. Just take the time you need to do other things and we'll look forward to when you're ready and able to come back and do some more on the project :)
g00r00 wrote to garycrunk <=-
For everyone here: Mystic is officially on hiatus. Sorry guys :(
For everyone here: Mystic is officially on hiatus. Sorry guys :(
When you start an interaction and appear (to me) to be an aggressor I
will respond as such.
prove my point every time you keep this going after many of us have said our peace and asked you to stop.
I think it's a good idea if both parties disengage now. As you mention (above) it's best to stop. So in that spirit let's not keep this thread going any further please.
I agree. Now did you send the same message to the person came here, started this, and refused to stop... Or just me? Because that'd be
pretty messed up if it was just the latter.
At this point I won't be using FSX in any capacity anymore, so no
need to worry.
I think it's a good idea if both parties disengage now. As you mentio (above) it's best to stop. So in that spirit let's not keep this thre going any further please.
I agree. Now did you send the same message to the person came here, started this, and refused to stop... Or just me? Because that'd be
pretty messed up if it was just the latter.
At this point I won't be using FSX in any capacity anymore, so no need to worry.
I agree. Now did you send the same message to the person came here, started this, and refused to stop... Or just me? Because that'd be pretty messed up if it was just the latter.
At this point I won't be using FSX in any capacity anymore, so no need to worry.
I think it's a good idea if both parties disengage now. As you
mention (above) it's best to stop. So in that spirit let's not
keep this thread going any further please.
I agree. Now did you send the same message to the person came here, started this, and refused to stop... Or just me? Because that'd be
pretty messed up if it was just the latter.
At this point I won't be using FSX in any capacity anymore, so no need
to worry.
He came here with the percieved attitude to see if he could "Stir the
pot" and feed off the negativity and discontent that he created.
He came here with the percieved attitude to see if he could "Stir
the pot" and feed off the negativity and discontent that he
created.
I disagree with this. I don't think that was his intention at all, the internet and in general the written word it is almost impossible to
tell peoples intentions, especially as most of us are not professional writers.
Hello apam!
30 Apr 18 17:46, you wrote to me:
He came here with the percieved attitude to see if he could "Stir
the pot" and feed off the negativity and discontent that he
created.
I disagree with this. I don't think that was his intention at all internet and in general the written word it is almost impossible
tell peoples intentions, especially as most of us are not profess writers.
The exception that I take is that IF that was the case he would have acknowledged and accepted the initial response(s) from g00r00 and
others. Instead he chose to continue and prolong the conflict. In my
mind his actions as well as his written word indicated his intent.
Did you read the exchange?
It started with an offhand remark about
mystic's webserver's compliance to standards, to which gOOrOO replied
in full on attack mode.
I don't think it's Trollish behavior to defends oneself from an
attack.
I don't think it's Trollish behavior to defends oneself from an attack.
True. But we just differ as to who the attacker and the attackee
were. I think we both have sufficiently expressed our opinions on the matter.
| Sysop: | sneaky |
|---|---|
| Location: | Ashburton,NZ |
| Users: | 31 |
| Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
| Uptime: | 132:53:53 |
| Calls: | 2,073 |
| Files: | 11,136 |
| Messages: | 947,558 |