1. Forum
  2. Fsxnet Message
  3. FSX MYS

  • 1/186 Pre-Alpha Upgrade

    From Black Panther@21:1/186 to All on Monday, April 16, 2018 20:09:21
    Hi All,

    1/186 has been updated to the newest pre-alpha.

    v1.12 A39 Linux/64 Compiled 2018/04/16 13:23:44

    This release fixes the need to run 'chmod +x mystic.dat'. :)

    Great job, g00r00!


    ---

    Black Panther
    a.k.a. Dan Richter
    Sysop - Castle Rock BBS (RCS)
    telnet://bbs.castlerockbbs.com
    http://www.castlerockbbs.com
    The sparrows are flying again....

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A39 2018/04/16 (Linux/64)
    * Origin: Castle Rock BBS - bbs.castlerockbbs.com (21:1/186)
  • From Pequito@21:1/126 to Black Panther on Monday, April 16, 2018 21:21:09
    On 04/16/18, Black Panther said the following...

    Hi All,

    1/186 has been updated to the newest pre-alpha.

    v1.12 A39 Linux/64 Compiled 2018/04/16 13:23:44

    This release fixes the need to run 'chmod +x mystic.dat'. :)

    Great job, g00r00!


    Yep I agree works like it did before! =)

    Cheers!
    Pequito

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A39 2018/04/16 (Linux/64)
    * Origin: Twinkle BBS # (21:1/126)
  • From g00r00@21:1/108 to Black Panther on Tuesday, April 17, 2018 00:18:34
    1/186 has been updated to the newest pre-alpha.

    v1.12 A39 Linux/64 Compiled 2018/04/16 13:23:44

    This release fixes the need to run 'chmod +x mystic.dat'. :)

    Great job, g00r00!

    Hah thanks! :) More like "shitty job making it require +x to begin with!" :P

    But i'll take as many "good jobs" as I can get!

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A39 2018/04/16 (Windows/32)
    * Origin: Sector 7 [Mystic BBS WHQ] (21:1/108)
  • From apam@21:1/125 to g00r00 on Tuesday, April 17, 2018 15:50:24
    Hah thanks! :) More like "shitty job making it require +x to begin
    with!" :P

    Hey, no one's perfect :)

    Just curious, what made the dat file require executable privileges? Was
    it just a check to see if it had correct privileges that had the wrong
    mode or something?

    It's got me intrigued lol :)

    Andrew

    --- MagickaBBS v0.10alpha (Linux/x86_64)
    * Origin: Exotica BBS - telnet://exoticabbs.com:2023/ (21:1/125)
  • From g00r00@21:1/108 to apam on Tuesday, April 17, 2018 02:08:03
    Just curious, what made the dat file require executable privileges? Was
    it just a check to see if it had correct privileges that had the wrong mode or something?

    It's got me intrigued lol :)

    I had it setup to check "mystic" for READ/WRITE/EXEC privileges. I decided to change that to MYSTIC.DAT considering if the program is already running you know they probably have /read/exec at least... And none of that matters if
    it can't get the configuration from MYSTIC.DAT.

    The problem was I changed "mystic" to "mystic.dat" but I forgot to remove the code that checked the +X attribute.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A39 2018/04/16 (Windows/32)
    * Origin: Sector 7 [Mystic BBS WHQ] (21:1/108)
  • From apam@21:1/125 to g00r00 on Tuesday, April 17, 2018 18:55:49
    The problem was I changed "mystic" to "mystic.dat" but I forgot to
    remove the code that checked the +X attribute.

    Ahh I've made many of those types of errors in the past, copy and paste
    but forget to change a bit :)

    Thanks for the explanation.

    Andrew

    --- MagickaBBS v0.10alpha (Linux/x86_64)
    * Origin: Exotica BBS - telnet://exoticabbs.com:2023/ (21:1/125)
  • From Static@21:2/140 to g00r00 on Tuesday, April 17, 2018 07:30:07
    On 04/17/18, g00r00 said the following...

    Hah thanks! :) More like "shitty job making it require +x to begin
    with!" :P

    Asking for permissions you don't need on file open eh?

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A39 2018/04/08 (Linux/64)
    * Origin: Subcarrier BBS (21:2/140)