Avon wrote to vk3jed <=-
The best way to do it is to create a dummy tic that you include in your echomail/in folder along with the file that you want to hatch out.
Now the format of this I will post when I get home tonight and you
might like to compare and contrast it with what Al will also discuss
(here hopefully) to pick up some (if any) differences.
Then you run your MUTIL like any other file import session and ensure
you have other echonodes attached to the file area the .TIC is pointing
at and that you have fileboxes set up for each echonode - all before
you run MUTIL.
Key things to get right are file area tag, file size, check to see if
you using a replace verb or not etc.
I'm at work (lunchtime) but will aim to reply further later.
** Important - please note **
Under the current way that Mystic is built, I think that if you were to hatch a file to an existing fsxNet file base on your BBS, and that filebase was also attached to the 21:1/100 echonode.. then your system would send a copy of the file to the HUB with an accompanying .TIC, and that the HUB would in turn then send the file and fresh .TICs on to
other nodes also connected to that file base.
That's something I'm not sure I'm that comfortable about happening as I wish to remain in control of files being hatched to the fsxNet file
bases and also ensure reporting of what has been sent out to nodes etc.
I think the plan was/is for g00r00 sometime in the future to enable hatching features in Mystic file bases based on ACS access. But I am unsure how that would work (as it's not enabled yet) and I am equally unsure how in the case of a HUB setup running Mystic, that it would
avoid the scenario I mentioned above.
So in sum, I'll do my best to help you (and others reading) with this subject but I'll need your co-operation / help also.
Sysop: | sneaky |
---|---|
Location: | Ashburton,NZ |
Users: | 31 |
Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
Uptime: | 200:43:52 |
Calls: | 2,083 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 11,139 |
Messages: | 947,930 |