• a36/download

    From Pequito@21:1/126 to g00r00 on Sunday, December 03, 2017 21:07:33
    Now that I had seen this in the main page should this have a date stamped on
    it like the pre-alpha's? :) See below.

    Cheers!
    Pequito

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A36 2017/12/03 (Linux/32)
    * Origin: Twinkle BBS # (21:1/126)
  • From bcw142@21:1/145.2 to Pequito on Monday, December 04, 2017 11:01:38
    On 12/03/17, Pequito said the following...

    Now that I had seen this in the main page should this have a date
    stamped on it like the pre-alpha's? :) See below.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A36 2017/12/03 (Linux/32)
    * Origin: Twinkle BBS # (21:1/126)

    Good point, I'm guessing yes because it's still an Alpha and we are trying to track what version things are still. I know it has no editor setup for blacklist.txt and such, so it's incomplete as Alphas tend to be. I also don't have a working Telnet, ssh and perhaps other services from mis (which was mis2). The ssh problem is a weird issue with this Linux/64 setup, the Telnet problem is unknown but perhaps a result of the same issue:
    bcw@leno:/mystic$ cryptlib: Conflicting SIGCHLD handling detected in randomness polling code, file random/unix.c, line 2035. See the source
    code for more information.
    Oddly I was able to login with rlogin and leave this, so I'm guessing most services are working internally. I just have problems with telnet & ssh.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A36 2017/12/03 (Linux/64)
    * Origin: Mystic AlphaTest bcw142.zapto.org:2323 (21:1/145.2)
  • From g00r00@21:1/108 to Pequito on Monday, December 04, 2017 03:03:28
    Now that I had seen this in the main page should this have a date
    stamped on it like the pre-alpha's? :) See below.

    No, I was planning to remove it but I was lazy. :)

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A37 2017/12/04 (Windows/64)
    * Origin: Sector 7 [Mystic BBS WHQ] (21:1/108)
  • From Pequito@21:1/126 to bcw142 on Monday, December 04, 2017 17:51:52
    On 12/04/17, bcw142 said the following...

    On 12/03/17, Pequito said the following...

    Now that I had seen this in the main page should this have a date stamped on it like the pre-alpha's? :) See below.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A36 2017/12/03 (Linux/32)
    * Origin: Twinkle BBS # (21:1/126)

    Good point, I'm guessing yes because it's still an Alpha and we are
    trying to track what version things are still. I know it has no editor setup for blacklist.txt and such, so it's incomplete as Alphas tend to
    be. I also don't have a working Telnet, ssh and perhaps other services from mis (which was mis2). The ssh problem is a weird issue with this Linux/64 setup, the Telnet problem is unknown but perhaps a result of
    the same issue: bcw@leno:/mystic$ cryptlib: Conflicting SIGCHLD handling detected in randomness polling code, file random/unix.c, line 2035. See the source code for more information.
    Oddly I was able to login with rlogin and leave this, so I'm guessing
    most services are working internally. I just have problems with telnet & ssh.

    Try removing the servers from the list and re-adding then see what happens. Worth noting that this fixed a handful of other issues. :)

    Cheers!
    Pequito

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A36 2017/12/03 (Linux/32)
    * Origin: Twinkle BBS # (21:1/126)
  • From Pequito@21:1/126 to g00r00 on Monday, December 04, 2017 17:52:46
    On 12/04/17, g00r00 said the following...

    Now that I had seen this in the main page should this have a date stamped on it like the pre-alpha's? :) See below.

    No, I was planning to remove it but I was lazy. :)

    We all get there but great work on the newest updates g00r00!

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A36 2017/12/03 (Linux/32)
    * Origin: Twinkle BBS # (21:1/126)
  • From bcw142@21:1/145 to g00r00 on Tuesday, December 05, 2017 18:33:51
    On 12/04/17, g00r00 said the following...

    Now that I had seen this in the main page should this have a date stamped on it like the pre-alpha's? :) See below.

    No, I was planning to remove it but I was lazy. :)

    Because of all the changes with alphas I think you should keep it till we get to a full release of 1.12, so you know what alpha people are running by their message. Otherwise people will be saying the latest Alpha when they mean 2
    days ago's alpha. It will make it more confusing for you trying to figure out if the problem still exists or you already fixed it. Lazy is likely a good thing here ;)

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A35 (Raspberry Pi/32)
    * Origin: Mystic Pi BBS bcw142.zapto.org (21:1/145)
  • From Avon@21:1/101 to bcw142 on Wednesday, December 06, 2017 19:20:11
    On 12/05/17, bcw142 pondered and said...

    On 12/04/17, g00r00 said the following...

    Now that I had seen this in the main page should this have a dat stamped on it like the pre-alpha's? :) See below.

    No, I was planning to remove it but I was lazy. :)

    Because of all the changes with alphas I think you should keep it till
    we get to a full release of 1.12, so you know what alpha people are running by their message. Otherwise people will be saying the latest

    +1

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A37 2017/12/04 (Windows/32)
    * Origin: Agency BBS | telnet://agency.bbs.geek.nz (21:1/101)