Ok, so I'm now running the BBS on 64bit ubuntu linux. Previously I've been running on Raspbian off of a RPiB3. I've always ran MIS and MIS2 under the old install. When I tried to run MIS in x64 (not armhf), I noticed a surprising event. I found that I would eventually see two instances of MIS running.
I would start it with 'sudo ./mis -d' and it would run fine. Then later
I would try to connect and it would fail. I'd do a 'ps -ef | grep mis' and then I would see two instances of MIS. One would be owned by init (process #1) and the second would be a child of the first. This would consistently happen. I decided this was a good time to try MIS2 and
have been running it without incident for at least a day now.
Has anybody else seen this behavior?
Ok, so I'm now running the BBS on 64bit ubuntu linux. Previously I've been running on Raspbian off of a RPiB3. I've always ran MIS and MIS2 under the old install. When I tried to run MIS in x64 (not armhf), I noticed a surprising event. I found that I would eventually see two instances of MIS running.
I would start it with 'sudo ./mis -d' and it would run fine. Then later
I would try to connect and it would fail. I'd do a 'ps -ef | grep mis' and then I would see two instances of MIS. One would be owned by init (process #1) and the second would be a child of the first. This would consistently happen. I decided this was a good time to try MIS2 and
have been running it without incident for at least a day now.
Has anybody else seen this behavior?
On 07/20/17, Gryphon said the following...
Ok, so I'm now running the BBS on 64bit ubuntu linux. Previously I'v been running on Raspbian off of a RPiB3. I've always ran MIS and MIS under the old install. When I tried to run MIS in x64 (not armhf), I noticed a surprising event. I found that I would eventually see two instances of MIS running.
I would start it with 'sudo ./mis -d' and it would run fine. Then la I would try to connect and it would fail. I'd do a 'ps -ef | grep mi and then I would see two instances of MIS. One would be owned by ini (process #1) and the second would be a child of the first. This woul consistently happen. I decided this was a good time to try MIS2 and have been running it without incident for at least a day now.
Has anybody else seen this behavior?
I have...exactly like that. It was happening to me on Ubuntu 16.04 LTS server (32 bit). I started running MIS2 for telnet and kept MIS for
BINKP and events. Like your's, when I did that, it stopped MISbehaving ;)
Sysop: | sneaky |
---|---|
Location: | Ashburton,NZ |
Users: | 31 |
Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
Uptime: | 132:05:25 |
Calls: | 2,073 |
Files: | 11,136 |
Messages: | 947,539 |