On 04/22/17, apam pondered and said...
Well that's interesting. The last 4 chars of the message id are the same, but the first four are different.
So... QWK working 2, QWK not working 1.
I'm not sure that's correct.
[snip]
From: apam
To: All
Subj: Msgid Test
Date: 04/22/17 18:10
Base: Mystic BBS Support/Dev
@TID: Mystic BBS 1.12 A32
@MSGID: 21:1/125.2 011602d7
@SEEN-BY: 1/1 100 101 102 103 104 105 107 108 109 111 112 113 114 115 117 118 @SEEN-BY: 119 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 133 134 135 136 137 @SEEN-BY: 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 @SEEN-BY: 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 171 172 @SEEN-BY: 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 189 190 @SEEN-BY: 191 192 193 194 195 998 999 2/100
@PATH: 1/125 100
Thought I'd also test MSGID generation with QWK seems
it worked for dan but didn't work for bcw142
My guess it was just well timed for Dan, but more data
cant hurt.
So I'm off to write a second message now, if you don't
see it, it might have got intercepted as a dupe..
[snip]
and message two is as follows
[snip]
From: apam
To: All
Subj: Test 2
Date: 04/22/17 18:10
Base: Mystic BBS Support/Dev
@TID: Mystic BBS 1.12 A32
@MSGID: 21:1/125.2 070be3d7
@SEEN-BY: 1/1 100 101 102 103 104 105 107 108 109 111 112 113 114 115 117 118 @SEEN-BY: 119 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 133 134 135 136 137 @SEEN-BY: 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 @SEEN-BY: 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 171 172 @SEEN-BY: 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 189 190 @SEEN-BY: 191 192 193 194 195 998 999 2/100
@PATH: 1/125 100
The Second Mail
[snip]
Both message ID in this case seem quite different to me.
So I wonder what is different between you and Brian. Perhaps the tools your using or?
Best, Paul
--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A32 (Windows)
* Origin: Agency BBS |
telnet://agency.bbs.geek.nz (21:1/101)