On 06-02-20 20:55, Avon wrote to All <=-
I'm thinking sports, entertainment etc. My thinking is if there is
demand for some spaces to chat about TV,Movies, etc.etc would an entertainment 'general' echo work?
The goal being to distill down wider topics into a few general 'catch
all' echos where they could reside. So a sports echo for all sorts or sports etc.
I'm interested in your feedback about the idea of adding say 2-4 echos that would cover shall we other non technical topics of a wider appeal
and nature.
Avon wrote to All <=-
I'm interested in your feedback about the idea of adding say 2-4
echos that would cover shall we other non technical topics of a
wider appeal and nature.
I'm thinking sports, entertainment etc. My thinking is if there
is demand for some spaces to chat about TV,Movies, etc.etc would
an entertainment 'general' echo work?
The goal being to distill down wider topics into a few general
'catch all' echos where they could reside. So a sports echo for
all sorts or sports etc.
If you're keen (as I know some seem to be) have a crack at trying
to group source a list of suggested 'new' fsxNet echos and let's
discuss it further.
But your task is to keep them to 2-4 in total so you're really
being asked to try and be as catch all as you can in what you
devise.
deserve their own echos. The Test echo would greatly reduce
traffic in this "General Chat" echo, which would be a good thing
in my opinion.
I'm interested in your feedback about the idea of adding say 2-4 echos that would cover shall we other non technical topics of a wider appeal
and nature.
I'm thinking sports, entertainment etc. My thinking is if there is
demand for some spaces to chat about TV,Movies, etc.etc would an entertainment 'general' echo work?
As has been discussed recently, I think that Politics/Debate are
two topics that should not have a dedicated echo, and should be discouraged (dis-allowed?) in any new/future/existing echos.
I'm interested in your feedback about the idea of adding say 2-4
echos that would cover shall we other non technical topics of a
wider appeal and nature.
I'm thinking sports, entertainment etc. My thinking is if there
2. Sports - for all types of sporting discussion.
The Entertainment and Sports topics are both wide enough to
deserve their own echos. The Test echo would greatly reduce
But your task is to keep them to 2-4 in total so you're really
being asked to try and be as catch all as you can in what you
devise.
I think that three additional echos would be good:
1. Entertainment - for discussion about movies, music, hobbies.
2. Sports - for all types of sporting discussion.
3. Test - for the requisite and never-ending "test" messages.
Entertainment has worked for mixing movies, music, literature, etc. Sports could fit in, but would be better explicitly mnentioned in the title to encourage discussion. e.g.:SEEN-BY: 1/1 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 109 110 111 112 114 115 116 117 SEEN-BY: 1/118 119 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 133 134 135 136 SEEN-BY: 1/137 138 139 140 141 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 SEEN-BY: 1/155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 171 172 SEEN-BY: 1/173 174 175 176 177 178 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 SEEN-BY: 1/191 192 193 194 195 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 207 208 209 210 SEEN-BY: 1/995 999 2/100 3/100 4/100 5/100
FSX_ENT
I'm interested in your feedback about the idea of adding say 2-4 echo that would cover shall we other non technical topics of a wider appea and nature.
I could see that, but I wish there was a dedicated "technical"
conference for, well, purely technical but general topics.
I think that three additional echos would be good:
1. Entertainment - for discussion about movies, music, hobbies.
2. Sports - for all types of sporting discussion.
3. Test - for the requisite and never-ending "test" messages.
As has been discussed recently, I think that Politics/Debate are
two topics that should not have a dedicated echo, and should be discouraged (dis-allowed?) in any new/future/existing echos.
One long goal I have, and I'm hoping to pick it up again (and perhaps encouragment will help me prioritise it :) is to have a distributed database of echomail, so that:
* FTN becomes like "IP", you only need 1 address to access multiple networks, not an address in every network - I dont get why a zone 24 address can only access zone 24 stuff.
Something I added when I set up my board was some echoes on British TV/movies...old Fox TV shows...Doctor Who/the Outer Limits (60's & 90's versions)/Gene Roddenberry productions (Genesis II/Questor Files & such)
& Irwin Allen (Lost in Space & Towering Inferno & such). I'm the only
one who adds stuff to them...but stuff like this is nothing I find anywhere else.
I think that would introduce a technical problem across Zones if the subsequent net/node parts of the addresses are the same.
For instance, and echo picked up on Tiny's system, 21:1/130, should not be then sent to Nick's system on 1:1/130. One or the other system would
drop the messages as dupes. Forget the techical term for it, but zone gating is a problem if the echo traverses between 21: and 1: when the net/ node numbers are the same in each zone. I think the problem arises in SEENBY processing, since the SEENBYs do not recognize the zones.
On 02 Jun 2020 at 08:56p, Vk3jed pondered and said......
Entertainment has worked for mixing movies, music, literature, etc.SEEN-BY: 1/1 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 109 110 111 112 114 115 116 117 SEEN-BY: 1/118 119 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 133 134
Sports could fit in, but would be better explicitly mnentioned in
the title to encourage discussion. e.g.:
FSX_ENT
5/100
...Sports could fit in, but would be better explicitly mnentioned inSEEN-BY: 1/1 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 109 110 111 112 114 115 117 SEEN-BY: 1/118 119 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 13
the title to encourage discussion. e.g.:
FSX_ENT
That's all this message had - did you say something?
@TID: Mystic BBS 1.12 A46
@MSGID: 21:1/101 a57ce72a
@REPLY: 48704.fsx-fsx_gen@21:1/109 233c2fe7
@TZUTC: 1200
On 02 Jun 2020 at 08:56p, Vk3jed pondered and said...
Entertainment has worked for mixing movies, music, literature,SEEN-BY: 1/1 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 109 110 111 112 114 115
etc. Sports could fit in, but would be better explicitly
mnentioned in the title to encourage discussion. e.g.:
FSX_ENT
116 117
SEEN-BY: 1/118 119 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 133 134
135 136
SEEN-BY: 1/137 138 139 140 141 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152
153 154
SEEN-BY: 1/155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169
171 172
SEEN-BY: 1/173 174 175 176 177 178 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188
189 190
SEEN-BY: 1/191 192 193 194 195 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 207 208
209 210
SEEN-BY: 1/995 999 2/100 3/100 4/10 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107
109 110 111
SEEN-BY: 4/112 113 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 128 129
131 133
SEEN-BY: 4/134 135 136 137 138 139 141 143 144 146 147 148 150 151 152
153 154
SEEN-BY: 4/155 156 157 158 159 160 161 163 164 165 166 167 168 170 171
172 173
SEEN-BY: 4/174 5/100
@PATH: 1/100 4/100
SEEN-BY: 1/1 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 109 110 111 112 114 115 116 117 SEEN-BY: 1/118 119 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 133 134 135 136 SEEN-BY: 1/137 138 139 140 141 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 SEEN-BY: 1/155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 171 172 SEEN-BY: 1/173 174 175 176 177 178 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 SEEN-BY: 1/191 192 193 194 195 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 207 208 209 210 SEEN-BY: 1/995 999 2/100 3/100 4/100 5/100On 06-02-20 20:55, Avon wrote to All <=-
I'm thinking sports, entertainment etc. My thinking is if there is demand for some spaces to chat about TV,Movies, etc.etc would an entertainment 'general' echo work?
Entertainment has worked for mixing movies, music, literature, etc. Sports could fit in, but would be better explicitly mnentioned in the title to encourage discussion. e.g.:
FSX_ENT
Entertainment has worked for mixing movies, music, literature,
etc. Sports could fit in, but would be better explicitly
mnentioned in the title to encourage discussion. e.g.:
FSX_ENT
@MSGID: 21:1/101 a57ce72a
@REPLY: 48704.fsx-fsx_gen@21:1/109 233c2fe7
@TZUTC: 1200
On 02 Jun 2020 at 08:56p, Vk3jed pondered and said...
Entertainment has worked for mixing movies, music, literature, etc. Sports could fit in, but would be better explicitly mnentioned in the title to encourage discussion. e.g.:
FSX_ENT Sports and Entertainment.
I think entertainment sounds like a nice general catch all for movies, literature, music etc. I'm picking sports may be better rested in a general echo of it's own.
--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/04/20 (Windows/32)
* Origin: Agency BBS | Dunedin, New Zealand | agency.bbs.nz (21:1/101)
...Sports could fit in, but would be better explicitly mnentionedSEEN-BY: 1/1 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 109 110 111 112 114 117 SEEN-BY: 1/118 119 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 1
the title to encourage discussion. e.g.:
FSX_ENT
That's all this message had - did you say something?
Yes I replied to it, can see it here at Agency I wonder if others saw my reply?
Here's my reply, just quoting the one one Agency.
Checking 1/100 I see two messages looking corrupted in this
echoarea... not sure what's up if it's my end of something at 1/100 ?
alterego wrote to All <=-
2. Sports - for all types of sporting discussion.
The Entertainment and Sports topics are both wide enough to
deserve their own echos. The Test echo would greatly reduce
So would you consider joining Sportsnet for the General Sports
chat? I have created a general chat area (or perhaps it already
exists, dont remember now) - for that person (in addition to the
many sports specific channels based on the sport type, eg: BMX,
or the sport competion, eg: Tennis (ITF).
Not here. That was all I saw as well. Didn't know if it was something on this end that messed up...
Entertainment has worked for mixing movies, music, literature, etc. Sports could fit in, but would be better explicitly mnentioned in the title to encourage discussion. e.g.:
On 02 Jun 2020 at 08:56p, Vk3jed pondered and said...
Entertainment has worked for mixing movies, music, literature,
etc. Sports could fit in, but would be better explicitly
mnentioned in the title to encourage discussion. e.g.:
I'm just testing another reply to this but quoted a little less..
Here's my reply, just quoting the one one Agency.
Checking 1/100 I see two messages looking corrupted in this echoarea... not sure what's up if it's my end of something at 1/100 ?
I was ready to fire off an application to you, but then... I
thought more about the echos that were listed in the info pack,
and realized that nearly every one of them was a sport that didn't interest me. Mostly obscure international and amateur leagues,
and most of them fed from Usenet sources. I'm quite familiar with
Usenet and the absolute *SEWER* of spam/crap that makes up most of
it's traffic.
I may still send you an application as I think about it some more.
One suggestion I would have is that there are *FAR* too many
echos, and what that causes is VERY small amounts of traffic in
all of them. I think they should be condensed down into fewer,
more generalized, areas. Just a suggestion.
I think it's something to do with the specific message I replied to. Perhaps I'll try again from Agency and see if it's reproducible. It
seems other replies from 1/100 via 1/100 and onwards are working fine. Hopefully this one too.
Compared to what we're kicking around I'd say those are probably more niche than I was thinking we might add at this stage. But I take your point on their interest to some and like the idea they could be
discussed in some entertainment style echo and I guess if the subject
discussed in some entertainment style echo and I guess if the subject matter grew to such a size then they would devolve off to their own fsx echo..
I was ready to fire off an application to you, but then... I
thought more about the echos that were listed in the info pack,
and realized that nearly every one of them was a sport that didn't interest me. Mostly obscure international and amateur leagues,
Avon wrote to All <=-
But your task is to keep them to 2-4 in total so you're really being
asked to try and be as catch all as you can in what you devise.
On 06-03-20 12:09, Avon wrote to Vk3jed <=-
On 02 Jun 2020 at 08:56p, Vk3jed pondered and said...
Entertainment has worked for mixing movies, music, literature, etc.
Sports could fit in, but would be better explicitly mnentioned in the title to encourage discussion. e.g.:
FSX_ENT
SEEN-BY: 1/1 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 109 110 111 112 114 115
116 117 SEEN-BY: 1/118 119 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131
133 134 135 136 SEEN-BY: 1/137 138 139 140 141 143 144 145 146 147 148
149 150 151 152 153 154 SEEN-BY: 1/155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163
164 165 166 167 168 169 171 172 SEEN-BY: 1/173 174 175 176 177 178 180
181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 SEEN-BY: 1/191 192 193 194 195
197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 207 208 209 210 SEEN-BY: 1/995 999
2/100 3/100 4/100 5/100
On 06-03-20 15:19, Avon wrote to Vk3jed <=-
On 02 Jun 2020 at 08:56p, Vk3jed pondered and said...
Entertainment has worked for mixing movies, music, literature, etc.
Sports could fit in, but would be better explicitly mnentioned in the title to encourage discussion. e.g.:
I'm just testing another reply to this but quoted a little less..
Black Panther wrote to Gamgee <=-
I was ready to fire off an application to you, but then... I
thought more about the echos that were listed in the info pack,
and realized that nearly every one of them was a sport that didn't interest me. Mostly obscure international and amateur leagues,
and most of them fed from Usenet sources. I'm quite familiar with
Usenet and the absolute *SEWER* of spam/crap that makes up most of
it's traffic.
That is actually in the process of changing. The echos are being
made more generic to each sport, instead of specific to a
specific league, for example.
I've also got a few echos that are not getting feeds from usenet,
but web scraping news from different websites.
alterego wrote to Gamgee <=-
I was ready to fire off an application to you, but then... I
thought more about the echos that were listed in the info pack,
and realized that nearly every one of them was a sport that didn't interest me. Mostly obscure international and amateur leagues,
So I think BP has already responded - but the network is being
built. We are actually discussion in the admin echo how to evolve
the net to something more useful.
For a general chat on sports - there is the general chat echo (no
feeds), so you could chat about anything there.
For "specific" sports, there echos there for those, which of
course you wouldnt need to subscribe to, if the sport didnt
intereset you.
I agree there were a lot, and some there were specific, and some
that were feed from usenet that had a lot of spam. Dan is feeding
some usenet into some echos now - those that are known to not
have spam (so hopefully the topic of the echo is more enjoyable),
and where there is no feed and/or no interest, we'll probably
drop (or consolidate if that makes sense).
I think that three additional echos would be good:
1. Entertainment - for discussion about movies, music, hobbies.
2. Sports - for all types of sporting discussion.
3. Test - for the requisite and never-ending "test" messages.
Sysop: | sneaky |
---|---|
Location: | Ashburton,NZ |
Users: | 31 |
Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
Uptime: | 39:03:24 |
Calls: | 2,096 |
Files: | 11,142 |
Messages: | 949,871 |