Just need a site to be able to catch up on my fsxNet when the main computer's occupied really.
Are there any fsxNet systems that are particularly friendly to ASCII/Text/whatever this ancient thing can actually display without issue? M first love is Black Flag (even have a t-shirt) but all that glorious ANSI turns into a glorious mess in ProTerm.
Just need a site to be able to catch up on my fsxNet when the main computer's occupied really.
On 02-10-20 10:00, deepthaw wrote to All <=-
Hey all,
Now that our niece and nephew are staying with us more frequently, I've been letting them have the "modern" PC while I stay in my man-cave fiddling with my Apple IIe.
Are there any fsxNet systems that are particularly friendly to ASCII/Text/whatever this ancient thing can actually display without
issue? My first love is Black Flag (even have a t-shirt) but all that glorious ANSI turns into a glorious mess in ProTerm.
Just need a site to be able to catch up on my fsxNet when the main computer's occupied really.
Are there any fsxNet systems that are particularly friendly to ASCII/Text/whatever this ancient thing can actually display without issue? My first love is Black Flag (even have a t-shirt) but all that
glorious ANSI turns into a glorious mess in ProTerm.
You might get a better looking result in Agate than ProTerm.. Off hand I can't remember what it does with blocks though. Only issue will be speed on a stock IIe because its all driven in DHGR, you won't get more than about 9600 out of it without losing characters.
I've heard of Agate, but I've not tried it yet. Speed is a major part
of it, my WiModem232 is running at 9600 right now, and when
Unfortunately its the nature of ANSI to be slower than two wet weeks compared to straight ascii. There's a handful of boards out there
running on Apple II's I haven't found anything that will gateway for the bulk of them though, so no FSXnet out there.
I've been idly considering using this as an excuse to throw up a BBS that carries fsxNet and the rest and is geared towards being as light-weight as possible for people BBSing from vintage hardware. All three of us, anyways.
Are there any fsxNet systems that are particularly friendly to ASCII/Text/whatever this ancient thing can actually display without
I also wondered if there was a News reading tool for the Apple then you could pull from a NNTP source if someone is running a NNTP on their
Mystic systems (or other BBS platform).
Not that I'm aware of, the IIe doesn't really have a TCP stack. It's
more just a dumb terminal. There are odd applications for and daemons
the IIe but most are more proof of concept than real workhorses.
Avon wrote to deepthaw <=-
On 10 Feb 2020 at 10:00a, deepthaw pondered and said...
Are there any fsxNet systems that are particularly friendly to ASCII/Text/whatever this ancient thing can actually display without
Good question... It's got me thinking about basic text only option
here.
Not that I'm aware of, the IIe doesn't really have a TCP stack. It's
more just a dumb terminal. There are odd applications for and daemons
the IIe but most are more proof of concept than real workhorses.
I don't know about Mystic, but Synchronet and other systems I've looked
at have the ability to support ASCII only or ANSI; most people neglect
to create or update the menus needed to support ASCII terminals.
And, by "Most People", I mean "Me".
Are there any fsxNet systems that are particularly friendly to ASCII/Text/whatever this ancient thing can actually display without
Good question... It's got me thinking about basic text only option here.
have the ability to support ASCII only or ANSI; most people neglect to create or update the menus needed to support ASCII terminals.
And, by "Most People", I mean "Me".
I have an Uthernet II card coming in soon which I believe has a TCP/IP stack built in. It's far more practical on a IIgs however, because
it actually has the application support.
friendly. I do use some "high ascii" characters in the menus, though. I would be curious to know if this causes problems for some callers. May be something I need to address.
with ANSI sequences. My end is really scraping the bottom of the
barrel, in order for it to work with any apple II I have to have ASCII only. An early II is limited in what it can display, but if I wanted to be even friendlier, I'd have to use 40Col not 80Col as well. Off hand I think c64's have weird screen width also..
The "plus" side is that ProTerm won't even run on anything less than a
IIe enhanced, which means the users should definitely at least have 80 column text. Can't speak for C64/etc. though.
The "plus" side is that ProTerm won't even run on anything less than
a IIe enhanced, which means the users should definitely at least
have 80 column text. Can't speak for C64/etc. though.
The "plus" side is that ProTerm won't even run on anything less than a IIe enhanced, which means the users should definitely at least have 80 column text. Can't speak for C64/etc. though.
Sysop: | sneaky |
---|---|
Location: | Ashburton,NZ |
Users: | 31 |
Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
Uptime: | 39:08:02 |
Calls: | 2,096 |
Files: | 11,142 |
Messages: | 949,871 |