I have a question for the experts around here. is it possible if you are running a BBS, to setup a Private FTN "network'?
For example, your bbs is on say 3 or 4 different network. You're going
to be away from your system for a few days, but don't want to delay any conversations you're participating in longer than necessary.
Could you set up a pseudo network and make a point to connect all of the various echoes you're in to follow them on your phone or tablet? Or
would you have to make a point for each Network?
I have a question for the experts around here. is it possible if you are running a BBS, to setup a Private FTN "network'?
For example, your bbs is on say 3 or 4 different network. You're going to be away from your system for a few days, but don't want to delay any conversations you're participating in longer than necessary.
Could you set up a pseudo network and make a point to connect all of the various echoes you're in to follow them on your phone or tablet? Or would you have to make a point for each Network?
I have a question for the experts around here. is it possible if you are running a BBS, to setup a Private FTN "network'?
For example, your bbs is on say 3 or 4 different network. You're going
to be away from your system for a few days, but don't want to delay any conversations you're participating in longer than necessary.
Could you set up a pseudo network and make a point to connect all of the various echoes you're in to follow them on your phone or tablet? Or
would you have to make a point for each Network?
The problem with the private network is that your messages would be originate from the wrong zone and would have an FTN from address that is not part of the public network (like 123:1/2 would be a wrong address in fsxnet). Of course there could be ways to rewrite the address and modify your mails, but I think configuring 4 point addresses is easier and less error prone (I wouldn't even know how to do the address rewriting.
Other options are:
- QWK offline reader
- NNTP for echomail
On 09-14-20 16:47, Charles Pierson wrote to All <=-
I have a question for the experts around here. is it possible if you
are running a BBS, to setup a Private FTN "network'?
For example, your bbs is on say 3 or 4 different network. You're going
to be away from your system for a few days, but don't want to delay any conversations you're participating in longer than necessary.
Could you set up a pseudo network and make a point to connect all of
the various echoes you're in to follow them on your phone or tablet?
Or would you have to make a point for each Network?
On 09-14-20 18:04, paulie420 wrote to Charles Pierson <=-
If that were me, I would just login to said BBS and read the FTNs. :/
I'm not being a dick, but... thats what the BBS is designed to do, lol. Right???
If you're going away just telnet into your BBS and read your FTNs.
Telnet is an option as well, but I haven't seen many Telnet apps that workwell for
on Android either.
Other options are:
- QWK offline reader
- NNTP for echomail
I've tried NNTP, but I don't care for it for some reason.
QWK is nice, but I've yet to see it available as an app on Android.
Telnet is an option as well, but I haven't seen many Telnet apps that
work well for me on Android either.
Ahh the joys of combining old and new.
For example, your bbs is on say 3 or 4 different network. You're going
to be away from your system for a few days, but don't want to delay any conversations you're participating in longer than necessary.
If that were me, I would just login to said BBS and read the FTNs. :/
Could you set up a pseudo network and make a point to connect all of
the various echoes you're in to follow them on your phone or tablet?
Or would you have to make a point for each Network?
situation! :)
On 09-14-20 18:04, paulie420 wrote to Charles Pierson <=-
If that were me, I would just login to said BBS and read the FTNs. :/
I'm not being a dick, but... thats what the BBS is designed to do, lol.
Right???
Re: Networks
By: Charles Pierson to Oli on Tue Sep 15 2020 03:28 am
Telnet is an option as well, but I haven't seen many Telnet apps that work
well for on Android either.
This is what I hate of smartphones. So much hardware power and they can't get proper communication software running on them. Pathetic.
If you are on Android, maybe you can run some telnet client on Termux? You can probably have kermit work inside.I've tried some Telnet on the Android. It's a little clunky to me but it works. Thee problem is no offline mail capabilities.
Or.. you could ask Stas if he would attach the Telgram bot for
the echos you desire. Then you could use Telegram Messenger
with your Android device. That could be a lot of preliminary
work for him to accommodate your different nets, but it might
inspire him to build othernet considerations in the code.
--
../|ug
I'm in no way answering your question, but for this particular use case, why wouldn't you just telnet in and use the BBS?
Charles Pierson wrote to paulie429 <=-
If that were me, I would just login to said BBS and read the FTNs. :/
I'm not being a dick, but... thats what the BBS is designed to do, lol.
Right???
If I had a mobile device which had a decent Telnet program an
offline reader of course. I've always preferred replying in
message bases in that fashion.
However I am considering my current situation. my only mobile
device is my phone. Telnet programs I have tried I'm not real
happy with, and I'm not for sure they have the DL capabilities
vfor Qwk packets. Nor am I familiar with any offline readers for
Android.
If I had a mobile device which had a decent Telnet program an offline reader of course. I've always preferred replying in message bases in
that fashion.
I've tried some Telnet on the Android. It's a little clunky to me but itworks. Thee problem is no
offline mail capabilities.
There is no good option for textmode BBSing on a modern smartphone that
I'm aware of.
golded and gossiped works fine via ssh or mosh (termux) ;). for unstableconnections mosh is great.
If that were me, I would just login to said BBS and read the FTNs. :/
...I feel bad for answering the same thing after you. :)
I suppose this does dovetail into the, "Why BBSs?" discussion fairly well. Why wouldn't we all just call into one or two other BBSs, rather than spending all the time and energy on running our own?
So, why not have an overly complicated solution for a problem that has a simple solution? It seems like it'd be entertaining to try.
And maybe those of us who've chosen to be sysops are a different sort, in one way or another.
If I had a mobile device which had a decent Telnet program an offline reader of course. I've always preferred replying in message bases in
that fashion.
However I am considering my current situation. my only mobile device is
my phone. Telnet programs I have tried I'm not real happy with, and I'm not for sure they have the DL capabilities vfor Qwk packets. Nor am I familiar with any offline readers for Android.
I do have a couple of old Nook devices. Ancient, from before they became Android. I recall reading somewhere that you could convert them into
Unix or other things. I might experiment with that.
You said it was for a "few days"...
Here's my suggestion: Don't bother. Unplug for a few days. It's actually an enjoyable sensation to not be a slave to an electronic
device for a while. Try it and see.
Quoting Charles Pierson to paulie429 <=-
I do have a couple of old Nook devices. Ancient, from before they
became Android. I recall reading somewhere that you could convert
them into Unix or other things. I might experiment with that.
On 09-15-20 09:41, Charles Pierson wrote to Vk3jed <=-
I know that's the easiest. Unfortunately, in they specific situation
I'm thinking of, I was thinking more of access with phone for tablet.
I don't know of any apps for QWK or Bluewave on such devices.
On 09-15-20 12:12, Static wrote to Charles Pierson <=-
On 15 Sep 2020, Charles Pierson said the following...
If I had a mobile device which had a decent Telnet program an offline reader of course. I've always preferred replying in message bases in
that fashion.
If you dont mind plain old DOS, some dosbox packages for android like Magic DosBox have working telnet-serial emulation and can be used with traditional terminals and offline readers.
On 09-16-20 08:59, Tiny wrote to Charles Pierson <=-
Quoting Charles Pierson to paulie429 <=-
I do have a couple of old Nook devices. Ancient, from before they
became Android. I recall reading somewhere that you could convert
them into Unix or other things. I might experiment with that.
I used to use a cheap chromebook. Installed dosbox on it for
bluewave
and somehow crammed a zmodem telnet client on it for transfering
packets. (You can also get packets emailed daily from some systems)
Quoting Charles Pierson to paulie429 <=-
I do have a couple of old Nook devices. Ancient, from before they
became Android. I recall reading somewhere that you could convert
them into Unix or other things. I might experiment with that.
I used to use a cheap chromebook. Installed dosbox on it for bluewave
and somehow crammed a zmodem telnet client on it for transfering
packets. (You can also get packets emailed daily from some systems)
In myopinion, a better fit than Aftershock or HotDogEd.
If you dont mind plain old DOS, some dosbox packages for android like
Magic DosBox have working telnet-serial emulation and can be used with
traditional terminals and offline readers.
keyboard, soyou can run the phone in landscape mode. :)
runfine with Lubuntu installed, and from there it was a simple matter of
addingSyncTerm and Multimail. :)
mode, sothe keyboard doesn't obscure the display. But it might be OK
with a Bluetoothkeyboard and running in landscape.
Charles Pierson wrote to All <=-
I have a question for the experts around here. is it possible if you
are running a BBS, to setup a Private FTN "network'?
For example, your bbs is on say 3 or 4 different network. You're going
to be away from your system for a few days, but don't want to delay any conversations you're participating in longer than necessary.
Could you set up a pseudo network and make a point to connect all of
the various echoes you're in to follow them on your phone or tablet?
Or would you have to make a point for each Network?
Quoting Charles Pierson to All at 09-14-20 16:47 <=-
I have a question for the experts around here. is it possible if you
are running a BBS, to setup a Private FTN "network'?
For example, your bbs is on say 3 or 4 different network. You're
going to be away from your system for a few days, but don't want to
delay any conversations you're participating in longer than necessary.
Could you set up a pseudo network and make a point to connect all of
the various echoes you're in to follow them on your phone or tablet?
Or would you have to make a point for each Network?
The more practical choice for a Android phone is a good NNTP client
accessing your system by NNTP. I suggest Piaohong Usenet Reader for
Android.
The more practical choice for a Android phone is a good NNTP client
accessing your system by NNTP. I suggest Piaohong Usenet Reader for
Android.
Gamgee wrote to Charles Pierson <=-
Here's my suggestion: Don't bother. Unplug for a few days. It's actually an enjoyable sensation to not be a slave to an electronic
device for a while. Try it and see.
Static wrote to Charles Pierson <=-
If you dont mind plain old DOS, some dosbox packages for android like Magic DosBox have working telnet-serial emulation and can be used with traditional terminals and offline readers.
Tiny wrote to Charles Pierson <=-
I used to use a cheap chromebook. Installed dosbox on it for
bluewave and somehow crammed a zmodem telnet client on it for
transfering packets. (You can also get packets emailed daily
from some systems)
Charles Pierson wrote to Tiny <=-
I need to go check my shed. I had a bunch of random parts and
components of old machines, including a couple of old 486 towers that
at one point in their history were network servers.
If you dont mind plain old DOS, some dosbox packages for android like Magic DosBox have working telnet-serial emulation and can be used with traditional terminals and offline readers.
Still a bit clunky, but perhaps workable, if you have a Bluetooth keyboard,
you can run the phone in landscape mode. :)
Gamgee wrote to Charles Pierson <=-
Here's my suggestion: Don't bother. Unplug for a few days. It's
actually an enjoyable sensation to not be a slave to an electronic
device for a while. Try it and see.
social life beyond my wife, kids and grandkids is online. I have
anxiety, and group situations tend to send me into major panic attacks. I've probably spoken more with the people on here in the week or so I've been set up on this network than I have had in person conversations in a year.
It's not a must, just a thing I like to do. But to be honest 90% of my social life beyond my wife, kids and grandkids is online. I have anxiety, and group situations tend to send me into major panic attacks. I've probably spoken more with the people on here in the week or so I've been set up on this network than I have had in person conversations in a year.
My experience has been that terminal applications look like garbage on smartphone screens, and that text entry / editing is excruciating. Sure, it works, but from a usability perspective it sucks ass in a huge way.
I'm not far from where your at. If I'm around 1 or 2 people, I'm not too bad, but any more than that, I feel the panic as well.
A lot of times, I end up having to just 'suck it up' and deal with it, which is a real pain. Usually while I'm work I can tolerate it to a
point.
My wife doesn't understand why I don't like going shopping with her at places like Walmart on Christmas Eve...
Quoting poindexter FORTRAN to Tiny <=-
Is there a DOSBOX for Chromebook that supports telnet to serial passthrough?
FYI, Synchronet lets you up/download QWK packets - log on with your credentials, and upload <bbsname>.REP to transmit replies, or
download <bbsname>.QWK, and it'll create the file on the fly.
Quoting Vk3jed to Tiny <=-
I acquired a bunch of surplus Lenovo netbooks from schools. Found
they run fine with Lubuntu installed, and from there it was a simple matter of adding SyncTerm and Multimail. :)
I'm not far from where your at. If I'm around 1 or 2 people, I'm not too bad, but any more than that, I feel the panic as well.
A lot of times, I end up having to just 'suck it up' and deal with it, which is a real pain. Usually while I'm work I can tolerate it to a point.
My wife doesn't understand why I don't like going shopping with her at places like Walmart on Christmas Eve...
I seem to be rather lousy at keeping up connections with people in the face to face physical world. Something I've always thought I should do/be better at but in the end am left wondering have I been beating myself over something that is not 'bad' after all but rather just 'is'.
On 09-16-20 07:45, Charles Pierson wrote to Vk3jed <=-
It would. Actually I do like HotdogEd, other than the issues I
mentioned earlier, and the fact it doesn't handle ANSI or being cable
to auto generate taglines.
On 09-16-20 07:59, Charles Pierson wrote to Vk3jed <=-
When I was in school, most of the schools had Apple IIs in some flavor.
My public high school felt I was enjoying myself just a little bit too much so invited me to not return after my 10th grade year. My parents enrolled me into
private Lutheran School, on a scholarship I'm sure. They used C=64s,. which was great for me, as it's what I had at home, and I never liked Apple computers even back then.
I have a Bluetooth keyboard my stepdaughter gave me when she got a new one. I just haven't used it much yet, because I forget to connect it.
On 09-16-20 18:23, Robert Wolfe wrote to Vk3jed <=-
Still a bit clunky, but perhaps workable, if you have a Bluetooth keyboard,
you can run the phone in landscape mode. :)
Hmm, this is something I can try at some point.
I have to concur. Completely useless unless you've got a seperatekeyboard. I tried playing a mud
like that too at one stage.... you'd only do it to try it, and find a realway to play/use it
afterwards.
On 09-16-20 07:45, Charles Pierson wrote to Vk3jed <=-
It would. Actually I do like HotdogEd, other than the issues I
mentioned earlier, and the fact it doesn't handle ANSI or being cable
to auto generate taglines.
illogical,and preferred the Apples. :)
I don't mind dealing with groups of people at work but there are no
social connections with them outside of work.
Something I've always thought I should do/be better at but in the end am left wondering have I been beating myself over something that is not
'bad' after all but rather just 'is'.
My wife doesn't understand why I don't like going shopping with her at places like Walmart on Christmas Eve...
Now do we know any BBSers who are mobile app developers? ;)
Quoting Charles Pierson to Mauro Veiga <=-
The more practical choice for a Android phone is a good NNTP client
accessing your system by NNTP. I suggest Piaohong Usenet Reader for
Android.
That's something I hadn't really considered. I theoretically have an
NNTP client in HotdogEd. I've used it to access some Fido before.
NNTP has just been kind of a last resort option for me because of the
mass of bots spamming crap in it in the past.
Quoting Alpha to Mauro Veiga <=-
On 09/16/2020 8:15 am Mauro Veiga said...
The more practical choice for a Android phone is a good NNTP client
accessing your system by NNTP. I suggest Piaohong Usenet Reader for
Android.
Any throughts on a good NNTP reader for iOS?
I'm a bit the opposite. I found certain aspects of the C64 a bit
illogical,
and preferred the Apples. :)
I started with Tandy, and then C64. My brother's I think all went the Apple route,. I just never took to them.
I think there's a proof-of-concept honeymoon period. You find an okay
I'm capable, although it's not a thing that I normally do.
I've been pondering over the past couple of days what might be the best approach.
One thing that's crossed my mind has been to develop a standard for a BBS web API, thus clients of various kinds (mobile apps, web front-ends, even desktop applications) could talk to any compliant system. Some concepts (around organization of message and file areas) are fairly common to all BBS software and could be mapped to this standard interface. If an attempt is made to keep it as RESTful as possible, there can be some flexibility between implementations.
This has the advantage over, say QWK or NNTP, of being able to possibly expose other BBS features (eg. chat).
Now, I could just invent this "standard" on my own and implement the back-end portion on Synchronet as an example, but it'd be great if it were something that other BBS packages might get on board with. Would be curious to hear people's thoughts on it.
I had to look some of that up. I've heard the terms but I'm not exactlyfamiliar with what they are
or do. It's a fascinating concept if I am understanding bit correctly, butis an entire new API
necessary?
I'll admit, I miss some of the features of BBSes in the manner I amcommunicating now. I enjoy Doors
on occasion, probably not enough to join a league. And I miss seeing theANSI graphics, for example.
adaptation isn't entirely possible. But point software is possible, so Iwould hope that a better
Telnet is possible, or out there that I just haven't seen yet. As well assome sort of mail reader.
On 17 Sep 20 10:32:19, Charles Pierson said the following to Vk3Jed:
I'm a bit the opposite. I found certain aspects of the C64 a bit
illogical,
and preferred the Apples. :)
I started with Tandy, and then C64. My brother's I think all went the
Apple route,. I just never took to them.
I had the Tandy 1000 TL3... my first DOS computer.
Re: Re: Networks
By: Charles Pierson to echicken on Thu Sep 17 2020 13:24:54
For the goal that I have in mind, yes, it'd be necessary. There are existing protocols that come close to the mark, but they might not be best suited for what I'm imagining.
I'm very much a textmode BBS user, but I see the utility in mobile & web interfaces for BBSs as well. Neither would ever be my primary (or even frequent) means of accessing my system, but it's a nice option to have on occasion - and when I do use it, I want it to be good.
When you get right down to it, cramming an 80-column terminal and a touch keyboard onto the screen of a modern phone, in an appropriate font at a readable size, just doesn't produce a good result. It's not nice to look at, and it's not nice to type into. Text entry is generally not even as good as in a typical mobile app (autocorrect, word suggestions, word deletion, etc. are usually off the table).
Telnet, SSH, etc. is possible, can be done, has been done, but the net result still stinks. It's something a system administrator might use in a pinch to do something on a server, but it's not something I can imagine using to compose a message like this one.
with a Bluetooth one. If I have a typo, and I have a lot, even on aregular computer, the backspace
doesn't generally work while in Telnet. I have to arrow back, and use adelete, which isn't standard
to a typical Android keyboard.
I had the Tandy 1000 TL3... my first DOS computer.
My Tandy was a Color Computer II. slightly older beast. :)
One thing that's crossed my mind has been to develop a standard for a BBS web API, thus clients of various kinds (mobile apps, web front-ends, even desktop applications) could talk to any compliant system. Some concepts (around organization of message and file areas) are fairly common to all BBS software and could be mapped to this standard interface. If an attempt is made to keep it as RESTful as possible, there can be some flexibility between implementations.
Now, I could just invent this "standard" on my own and implement theback-end portion on Synchronet as an example, but it'd be
great if it were something that other BBS packages might get on boardwith. Would be curious to hear people's thoughts on it.
I don't mind dealing with groups of people at work but there are no social connections with them outside of work. Most of my social connections would b immediate family, to a lesser extent family living afar, followed by friends have made here.
I seem to be rather lousy at keeping up connections with people in the face to face physical world. Something I've always thought I should do/be better at but in the end am left wondering have I been beating myself over somethin that is not 'bad' after all but rather just 'is'.
On 09-17-20 09:23, Tiny wrote to Vk3jed <=-
Quoting Vk3jed to Tiny <=-
I acquired a bunch of surplus Lenovo netbooks from schools. Found
they run fine with Lubuntu installed, and from there it was a simple matter of adding SyncTerm and Multimail. :)
Perfect. This laptop I bought for a couple hundred a few years ago,
some dell thing that is still nice and fast and even runs most games.
Just has a small SSD which I'm sure will be replaced with a larger
one
as soon as I get around to doing it.
On 09-17-20 10:27, Charles Pierson wrote to Vk3jed <=-
Now do we know any BBSers who are mobile app developers? ;)
They're around. But they have their own projects.
On 09-17-20 10:32, Charles Pierson wrote to Vk3jed <=-
I'm a bit the opposite. I found certain aspects of the C64 a bit
illogical,
and preferred the Apples. :)
I started with Tandy, and then C64. My brother's I think all went the Apple route,. I just never took to them.
On 09-17-20 11:56, echicken wrote to Vk3jed <=-
Re: Re: Networks
By: Vk3jed to Charles Pierson on Thu Sep 17 2020 20:32:00
Now do we know any BBSers who are mobile app developers? ;)
I'm capable, although it's not a thing that I normally do.
I've been pondering over the past couple of days what might be the best approach.
One thing that's crossed my mind has been to develop a standard for a
BBS web API, thus clients of various kinds (mobile apps, web
front-ends, even desktop applications) could talk to any compliant
system. Some concepts (around organization of message and file areas)
are fairly common to all BBS software and could be mapped to this
standard interface. If an attempt is made to keep it as RESTful as possible, there can be some flexibility between implementations.
This has the advantage over, say QWK or NNTP, of being able to possibly expose other BBS features (eg. chat).
Now, I could just invent this "standard" on my own and implement the back-end portion on Synchronet as an example, but it'd be great if it
were something that other BBS packages might get on board with. Would
be curious to hear people's thoughts on it.
On 09-17-20 13:01, Mauro Veiga wrote to CHARLES PIERSON <=-
This is in open Usenet groups. On private areas from your system
don't occur. NNTP clients are more practical on cell phone. Try
Piahong Usenet reader.
QWKoffline reader in the Google Play store. :)
theC64, I never took to it.
If that's the sole device one plans on using for BBSing, it can work well, b if you're like me and like to "device hop", NNTP is a pain, because you have manually synchronise lastread pointers and group/area subscriptions between newsreader and the BBS. That got old pretty quickly for me. The fact that NNTP keeps all that data client side is a pain for BBSing.
1. What about legacy BBSs?
2. Can this be run offline? "Always on" doesn't meet two of my needs:
3. How "chatty" is this likely to be? Chatty protocols can slow down downloading - a concern when in marginal mobile coverage. QWK, using asimple
FTP or Zmodem transfer is extremely efficient in this regard.
Interesting, though would need to be widely adopted to be useful. Worth exploring.
My own personal network is very feeble because I spent my high-school and college years trying to become a professionalñ instead of making
friends via drinking and partying hard. End result is I have some nice
Gamgee wrote to Charles Pierson <=-
Here's my suggestion: Don't bother. Unplug for a few days. It's
actually an enjoyable sensation to not be a slave to an electronic
device for a while. Try it and see.
Odd. I never saw Gamgee's message.
It's not a must, just a thing I like to do. But to be honest 90% of
my social life beyond my wife, kids and grandkids is online. I have anxiety, and group situations tend to send me into major panic
attacks. I've probably spoken more with the people on here in the
week or so I've been set up on this network than I have had in person conversations in a year.
Even if I only lurk, it is my way of seeing how people I know and
care about are doing.
Warpslide wrote to Avon <=-
Eventually they stopped asking, which was kind of a relief. I'm not
sure why, but I've always just kind of compartmentalized the people I
work with vs the people I know outside of work.
Warpslide wrote to Black Panther <=-
On 17 Sep 2020, Black Panther said the following...
My wife doesn't understand why I don't like going shopping with her at places like Walmart on Christmas Eve...
That's me going to Costco on any given day. Now I will only go 30 or
45 minutes before closing during the week. It's just way too peopley
in there for my comfort level.
Perfectly alright, and further more I must commend you on being open about it and talking about it. From my own experience with similar matters I know how hard that can be even if one chooses to do it anonymously.
Also - thanks for posting quality content like this for us to have a real, proper discussion about instead of some of the more stupid stuff from the zillionere.
Vk3jed wrote to Tiny <=-
I do need a new laptop that I can actually do web browsing on, but the netbook is ideal for BBSing. Another good thing about BBSing is it's great for recycling old hardware. :)
On 09-18-20 07:52, Charles Pierson wrote to Vk3jed <=-
I was testing out some telnet apps last night. well actually just one, because I got frustrated. it seemed to be going well connecting, at
least to Castle Rock, but if I switched over to another app for even a second to check something, or reply to a message, it dropped the
session.
On 09-18-20 08:03, Charles Pierson wrote to Vk3jed <=-
Tandy did have some nice machines for the time. And I was like that
with
the
C64, I never took to it.
Obviously, you weren't alone. Apple is still around.
On 09-18-20 06:20, Arelor wrote to Vk3jed <=-
I know it does not help you, but what I do is have my NNTP client in a remote shell. That way, I can access the remote client from any other device. So I have NNTP in any machine capable of SSHing into the shell
and the read/unread pointer is stored in the remote shell.
On 09-18-20 13:49, echicken wrote to Vk3jed <=-
Re: Re: Networks
By: Vk3jed to echicken on Fri Sep 18 2020 19:36:00
1. What about legacy BBSs?
This is easy to do on Synchronet since there's already a webserver and
a scripting environment that hooks into all kinds of BBS data. I'm sure it's equally simple with some other BBS packages.
For older BBSs, one would need to be able to read and write whatever datastore(s) the BBS uses (files on disk, typically) and connect all of that to a web service. It's doable but it would depend on interested parties doing the work and I honestly doubt if that would happen.
2. Can this be run offline? "Always on" doesn't meet two of my needs:
What I'm talking about right now is just a web API. Clients that
interact with it wouldn't always need to be online.
A mobile app could grab updates (new messages, etc.) when networking is available and then store stuff
locally to be read later. Or send out new messages when the network becomes available.
3. How "chatty" is this likely to be? Chatty protocols can slow down downloading - a concern when in marginal mobile coverage. QWK, using a
simple
FTP or Zmodem transfer is extremely efficient in this regard.
Probably not very chatty. If there were a persistent connection when networking was available, it'd be idle and silent most of the time,
with the client receiving updates as necesssary. This can be more efficient than having the client poll the server on a schedule.
Interesting, though would need to be widely adopted to be useful. Worth exploring.
It'd be cool if it were widely adopted, but that doesn't necessarily affect its usefulness. If Synchronet supported it, a whole lot of BBSs could enable the feature very easily.
This is just another way of getting content into and out of a BBS. Like
an offline mailer, or an NNTP client, or an FTP client, or a web interface. Not everyone needs to be using the BBS the same way for this
to work.
Right now I'm thinking of three things: the API back-end, a mobile app, and a web interface that could be used with any compliant BBS software.
On 09-19-20 08:27, Tiny wrote to Vk3jed <=-
Vk3jed wrote to Tiny <=-
I do need a new laptop that I can actually do web browsing on, but the netbook is ideal for BBSing. Another good thing about BBSing is it's great for recycling old hardware. :)
Very true. Thankfully my laptop is still good enough for an all
around
machine.
On 09-18-20 07:52, Charles Pierson wrote to Vk3jed <=-
I was testing out some telnet apps last night. well actually just one,
because I got frustrated. it seemed to be going well connecting, at
least to Castle Rock, but if I switched over to another app for even a
second to check something, or reply to a message, it dropped the
session.
And don't overlook the user databases, otherwise we'll have a JAMNNTPd
I thought so. I personally would prefer not to be interacting with theserver
side in real time, and have that communication happening in thebackground.
That would be a start, but it does mean the client will be far fromuniversal.
Still, as I read mail on a Synchronet BBS, I would use it.
Depends what way you mean. Technology wise, it'll work, no doubt there.But
for the bigger picture of introducing BBSs to mobile users, only some BBSswill
be able to take part.
I suspect there will need to be some sort of BBS specific layer betweenmany
BBS software packages and the web interface. But if it's modular (and documented well) enough, interested third parties might be able to writesome
of the missing pieces for their favourate software.
On 09-19-20 06:38, Charles Pierson wrote to Vk3jed <=-
Yeah, that sensitive to multitask is no bueno.
On 09-19-20 12:29, echicken wrote to Vk3jed <=-
Re: Re: Networks
By: Vk3jed to echicken on Sat Sep 19 2020 19:11:00
And don't overlook the user databases, otherwise we'll have a JAMNNTPd
Authentication would be a service that any implementation of the API "should" provide.
In the case of legacy BBS software, the web API might be an external application that accesses the BBS data via the filesystem; it's really
up to the implmentor to figure out how to make that work.
Ideally a mobile client would prefetch stuff in some sensible manner
(eg. all new messages in subscribed areas as they become available, and
so on) so that it happens quietly in the background and makes content available offline. (Rather than waiting for you to tap on something to initiate a request.)
The client could be a "universal" thing, or it could be a template app that sysops could repackage for use exclusively with their BBS.
Depends what way you mean. Technology wise, it'll work, no doubt there.
But
for the bigger picture of introducing BBSs to mobile users, only some BBSs
will
be able to take part.
Right, but if I pursued this, I'd only be able to do so much. Users
would need to pick from the compatible systems that are available.
The role of the web API would be to channel the BBS-package-specific
stuff into a standard format, so that the main stuff like messages,
files, who's online, user list, bulletins, would all be available to clients in a predictable format regardless of the back-end.
For additional features that are BBS-specific, the API could leave room for extensions, and client side features could be designed to only show
up if the server supports them.
It may be impossible to do this *properly* in a universal way. Right
now I'm just poindering it and wondering at what point does each BBS package diverge. For example, Synchronet message headers include a lot
of useful information (about message threads, etc.) which not every
other BBS may provide or be able to emulate.
Quoting Vk3jed to Mauro Veiga <=-
On 09-17-20 13:01, Mauro Veiga wrote to CHARLES PIERSON <=-
This is in open Usenet groups. On private areas from your system
don't occur. NNTP clients are more practical on cell phone. Try
Piahong Usenet reader.
If that's the sole device one plans on using for BBSing, it can work
well, but if you're like me and like to "device hop", NNTP is a pain, because you have to manually synchronise lastread pointers and
group/area subscriptions between the newsreader and the BBS. That got
old pretty quickly for me. The fact that NNTP keeps all that data
client side is a pain for BBSing.
Other than the lack of server side synchronisation, NNTP was quite
good as far as reading/writing messages went. But the lastread pointer and subscription issue was a deal breaker for me. :(
... Vegetarian (n.), Ancient native word meaning "lousy hunter".
On 09-20-20 10:16, Mauro Veiga wrote to VK3JED <=-
I read/wrote a lot on NNTP in the past and this feature don't
disturb me. Is a different feeling. But i prefer Bluewave or
OpenXP on BBSing. The DOS text screen give me pleasure to use.
:-)
Unfortunately, I could never afford an Apple back then (was still in school), but there was one Commodore that I definitely wanted - the
Amiga. By then, I was a poor full time uni student, so no joy on
that on ether. :/
On 09-20-20 07:56, Spectre wrote to Vk3jed <=-
Unfortunately, I could never afford an Apple back then (was still in school), but there was one Commodore that I definitely wanted - the
Amiga. By then, I was a poor full time uni student, so no joy on
that on ether. :/
I skipped the UNI bit, just went and got a job. And I managed to buy, wait for it, an old europlus out of a school ;) As much I was a tad parochial in the apple dept, I was never over interested in the Amiga.
By the time it came to look for a BBS candidate I ran with a PC...
I don't mind dealing with groups of people at work but there are no
social connections with them outside of work. Most of my social connections would be immediate family, to a lesser extent family living afar, followed by friends I have made here.
I seem to be rather lousy at keeping up connections with people in the face to face physical world. Something I've always thought I should
do/be better at but in the end am left wondering have I been beating myself over something that is not 'bad' after all but rather just 'is'.
Would it be any easier/harder/about the same in terms of anxiousness if the people whom you got to know and become friends with in BBS world, were all i a big hall together.
For me, I think it would be probably a little easier.
Would it be any easier/harder/about the same in terms of anxiousness if the people whom you got to know and become friends with in BBS world,
were all in a big hall together.
For me, I think it would be probably a little easier.
I guess I tend to assume that most people who'd regularly participate in
a discussion forum like this would wind up being at least somewhat
social.
Well, among the crowd of people they already know, even if they don't
know how they look.
But I'm coming from the perspective of being moderately extroverted (probably an ambivert, technically, but I think that makes me
"moderately extroverted", especially with the techie crowd.).
I guess I tend to assume that most people who'd regularly participate in
a discussion forum like this would wind up being at least somewhat
social.
I think if a conversation got onto something I knew a lot about, I could be fairly comfortable talking amongst a handful of people that I know, but when conversations turn to something I know little to nothing about, even if people whom I know and trust are around, I tend to stealthily slide away into the background where my comfort zone is.
I think I am not at all alone in this anxiousness or introvertedness (is that even a word? Guess it is now).
but when conversations turn to something I know little to nothing about, even if people whom I know and trust are around, I tend to stealthily slide away into the background where my comfort zone is.
On 09-23-20 10:41, Adept wrote to MeaTLoTioN <=-
I guess I tend to assume that most people who'd regularly participate
in a discussion forum like this would wind up being at least somewhat social.
But I'm coming from the perspective of being moderately extroverted (probably an ambivert, technically, but I think that makes me
"moderately extroverted", especially with the techie crowd.).
but when conversations turn to something I know little to nothing abo even if people whom I know and trust are around, I tend to stealthily slide away into the background where my comfort zone is.
That seems to make some inherent sense. Who is thrilled with a conversation that involves a topic that exposes a lack of knowledge, the have no opinion on, is boring, etc.?
I have broad interests in general, but if people started talking about their favorite metal bands, I could probably throw in a few random words (Volbeat! Type-O Negative!) and ask questions (Is Rammstein metal, or
are they something else?), but two metal heads talking about the music would be completely lost on me, and I'd just be standing there, not gaining any useful knowledge or being able to be involved in the conversation.
And, yeah, I'd generally go away at that point, even if I was trying to stick with it. I think extroverted people would be _more_ likely to go away, because there surely are more people to talk with, and with whom they could do more speaking.
in a discussion forum like this would wind up being at least somewhat social.Actually, a lot of people who take to technology are somewhat
introverted, and online communication is easier for introverts to deal
Is Rammstein metal? I think they're more industrial metal, and I really
I would be looking for less people to talk with in general lol. I think
I mean, introverted != antisocial.
But sure, I wouldn't argue that point. I just tended to think that those who engage in communication (as opposed to going for door games and/or files), would be more likely to want some amount of social behavior.
I doubt there's anyone super extroverted here, though I did have a sysop friend for a while who was _extremely_ extroverted. One of those extroverts who adopts a bunch of introverts.
Thus closer friends are easier. Though I assume they're easier for most everyone. Just doesn't have quite as much of a novelty factor.
it wouldn't work for me, because I generally have a 50lbs bag of
dogfood, his reply was then i would have an excuse for a second trip.
My first thought was "My God, I'd have to go to the store again?"
friend for a while who was _extremely_ extroverted. One of those extro who adopts a bunch of introverts.
I know the type. They want to "fix" us.
I'm not so sure about that. My dad has always been a big introvert. I've never known him to have more than one or two friends at a time. I was like that when I was younger. Now I don't even have that. Not in person.
Most of the rest of my family, are extroverted. I mean to the point that they have never met a stranger. I just can not grok that mindset.
Actually, while it's true introverted isn't the same as antisocial, my personal preference is minimal social activity face to face. It drains me too much.
I know the type. They want to "fix" us.
Most of the rest of my family, are extroverted. I mean to the point that they have never met a stranger. I just can not grok that mindset.
My first thought was "My God, I'd have to go to the store again?"
...that just seems odd. People actually enjoy that?
I mean, don't get me wrong -- before the pandemic changed everything, I enjoyed going to thrift stores, trying on fun clothes at whatever store, etc., but a second trip to the _same_ store, in the _same_ area, on the same day?
I know the type. They want to "fix" us.
Eh, while probably true, I think it was that he wanted to be doing something _all the time_, and if all his friends were introverts or moderately anti-social ambiverts like me, he needed to have a dozen friends just to keep his social calendar as full as he wanted.
But the world in general does seem to expect people to be extroverted, which can cause problems.
So, wait, one or two people, period, that he kept in contact with? Or just one or two people he ever hung out with on any consistent basis?
Most of the rest of my family, are extroverted. I mean to the point that
they have never met a stranger. I just can not grok that mindset.
Yeah, that _is_ a pretty different mindset. I like people well enough, and will be friendly to anyone, but... if I haven't talked to them before, they're a stranger.
This does remind me of my thing with names -- I dislike having introductory things where everyone says their name. Because I don't care. I want to learn the names after I learn the people. The name is really only there because I need a way to identify one person as being different from another.
But society dictates...
This is something that I could never do, to the point it would never occur to my mind as something TO do.
This does remind me of my thing with names -- I dislike
having introductory things where everyone says their name.
Because I don't care. I want to learn the names after I
learn the people.
poindexter FORTRAN wrote to Gamgee <=-
Here's my suggestion: Don't bother. Unplug for a few days. It's actually an enjoyable sensation to not be a slave to an electronic
device for a while. Try it and see.
Didn't we all sign up for electronic servitude when we got our
first mailer license?
On 09-25-20 10:49, Adept wrote to Vk3jed <=-
I mean, introverted != antisocial.
But sure, I wouldn't argue that point. I just tended to think that
those who engage in communication (as opposed to going for door games and/or files), would be more likely to want some amount of social behavior.
I doubt there's anyone super extroverted here, though I did have a
sysop friend for a while who was _extremely_ extroverted. One of those extroverts who adopts a bunch of introverts.
...that just seems odd. People actually enjoy that?
I think his point was more to the riding the Spider, but still.
I'm much the same. Well, not so much trying on clothes, but checking
out the wares at thrift stores, hardware/tool stores, or electronics stores, I could wander around looking all day.
There is that. But still surprising he'd do so with a bunch of introverts.
We're alien creatures to one another. It's like you cannot get into the other mindset. I mean, intellectually, you might be able to understand the idea, but you truly cannot know what it's like.
wrote above.. "I dislike these introductory things where we
say our names, becuase I don't care." ..and everyone will have
a good laugh and know that they are dealing with with someone
who can speak their mind and doesn't mind. ;) Nothing wrong
about that.
easier than traditional social occasions like parties and clubbing. I'm
Adept wrote to Vk3jed <=-
I mean, I learned to (generally) enjoy going dancing while sober, but
that took a fair amount of effort to get there, and still depends on a variety of considerations, like being there with friends or a
significant other who sticks around and isn't _that_ drunk.
easier than traditional social occasions like parties and clubbing. I'
I do kind of wonder about those things, as they mostly seem to be excuses to binge drink.
On 09-27-20 11:20, Adept wrote to Vk3jed <=-
easier than traditional social occasions like parties and clubbing. I'm
I do kind of wonder about those things, as they mostly seem to be
excuses to binge drink.
I mean, I learned to (generally) enjoy going dancing while sober, but
that took a fair amount of effort to get there, and still depends on a variety of considerations, like being there with friends or a
significant other who sticks around and isn't _that_ drunk.
And also it not being so crowded that one gets bumped all the time.
But I mostly did that with a significant other who, while introverted, enjoyed it as a binge drinking event, and the drinking enabled them to enjoy the experience more, even with occasionally being bumped.
On 09-27-20 11:12, Adept wrote to Ogg <=-
I dunno. I think I'd prefer an introductory thing where people talked about what living famous person they'd like to have a meal and conversation with.
On 09-27-20 12:42, Arelor wrote to Adept <=-
I think going to a place in order to socialize is the wrong approach.
You have to go to a place because you want to go there, and if you
happen to find somebody cool there, then great,
Today I had that experience, sort of. I went to a target shooting competition because I wanted to blast targets away and have some fun burning gunpowder. There happened to be people with guns over there
(duh). So at some point somebody pulled a piece of equipment from a bad and I broke in and asked "Hey dude, that looks cool, how much did it
cost you?"
There you have it, social interaction you don't have to force. You
start a conversation about a common interest because you were to a
place in order to practice that interest.
"Things I learned when I stopped drinking."
One of the items on the list was "I didn't realize until I stopped
drinking that I DON'T KNOW HOW TO DANCE"
There you have it, social interaction you don't have to force. You start
a conversation about a common interest because you were to a place in order to practice that interest.
I dunno. I think I'd prefer an introductory thing where people talked about what living famous person they'd like to have a meal and conversation with.
Those ficticious ones do my head in, no thanks. ;)
Me, I am not a fan of bars and nightclubs, so I generally avoid them. I
It kind of gives me anxiety to think about trying to order a drink at abusy
bar in a nightclub.idea
I'm soft-spoken, inclined to let others go in front of me, etc., and the
of pushing through a crowd for a drink...
On 09-28-20 12:15, Adept wrote to Vk3jed <=-
Yeah, I don't know that there's a good solution. Especially as a one-size-fits-all sort.
But I chose that one in particular because it's fairly close to a study
on increasing closeness between couples (as in, two couples becoming friends), and they had various questions -- more on the ice breaker
side of things, and more like this one, where theoretically it led
people to learn something about a person.
So, the scientifically-tested-to-be-helpful question was, "Given the choice of anyone in the world, whom would you want as a dinner guest?"
...but I don't know how well-tested it is. And there are a variety of later, deeper questions that I just have no clue how to approach.
But, regardless, I'd still prefer most things over random names with random faces, all blurring together and soon forgotten.
On 09-28-20 16:27, Adept wrote to Vk3jed <=-
Me, I am not a fan of bars and nightclubs, so I generally avoid them. I
It kind of gives me anxiety to think about trying to order a drink at a busy bar in a nightclub.
I'm soft-spoken, inclined to let others go in front of me, etc., and
the idea of pushing through a crowd for a drink...
Yeah, not my thing. Though it's also difficult to dance forever if you don't have a water source.
I'm that person who really screws up the science. I think in quite would), and come up with a smart ass (and probably correct) answer like "We don't have people over for dinner that we don't know". :D
Sometimes a little of self introduction about what a person does can create something that sticks in the mind. :)
Sometimes a little of self introduction about what a person does can create something that sticks in the mind. :)
That's why I like to talk about how I'm a free-range marshmallow Peeps farmer.
On 09-30-20 13:10, Adept wrote to Vk3jed <=-
I'm that person who really screws up the science. I think in quite would), and come up with a smart ass (and probably correct) answer like "We don't have people over for dinner that we don't know". :D
I mean, that'd tell me something about you.
Sometimes a little of self introduction about what a person does can create something that sticks in the mind. :)
That's why I like to talk about how I'm a free-range marshmallow Peeps farmer.
but it was very low traffic then - I of course forgot VKradio (actually I haven't seen anything from vk3jed in a while - hope he is ok..)
Sysop: | sneaky |
---|---|
Location: | Ashburton,NZ |
Users: | 31 |
Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
Uptime: | 18:09:37 |
Calls: | 2,095 |
Calls today: | 2 |
Files: | 11,142 |
Messages: | 949,485 |