From my experience so far, which is exceptionally limited, the Win32 versions of Mystic appear to be a lot more stable for novice SysOps like myself. I started with Linux64 versions a couple of months back and discovered that the "mis" executable sometimes races (100% CPU) when passing control back and
forth between external doors. I had similar issues when clients would disconnect without logging off, although this didn't appear to happen every time (race condition possibly?). To cut a long story short, I often logged on to my BBS only to find that Mystic was happily burning away at 100% CPU usage.
Of course, this could (most likely) be down to my MIS/BNU/DOSEMU configuration skills, but the A46 Win32 version doesn't appear to exhibit these issues at
all (well, not with NETFOSS anyhow). Now I've gotten over the initial disappointment of not running my BBS on a Linux server - it currently runs in
a Windows XP VM - I'm looking forward to buying a dedicated Win32 box as a final solution. All in all, I'm very happy with Win32 as a host OS.
As for FOSSIL support, I can't recommend NETFOSS highly enough: the guy who develops it is a very amenable chap, and all too willing to address any issues you may encounter (he quickly released updates when I came across an issue a while back).
Best Regards
|01°|09²²²²² |01³|09 Lee Westlake |01(aka TALIADON)
°|09²|01°|09²|01°|09² |01³|09 TALIADON BBS |01(taliadon.ddns.net)
°|09²|01 ³ E-Mail:
taliadon-bbs@outlook.com
°|09²²²|01 ³ fsxNet: 21:3/138
--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Windows/32)
* Origin: TALIADON BBS (21:3/138)