echicken wrote to poindexter FORTRAN <=-
Probably websrvr.c, but could be something else. I only vaguely recall some kind of problem with chunked transfers within the past few months; this may be unrelated. If your build is 2+ months old it might be
worth updating to see if it helps.
Probably websrvr.c, but could be something else. I only vaguely
recall some kind of problem with chunked transfers within the past
few months; this may be unrelated. If your build is 2+ months old
it might be worth updating to see if it helps.
So, now I have another weird problem - after DM fixed the earlier error with SBBS running inet_ntop, and it being not able to run under XP,
echicken wrote to poindexter FORTRAN <=-
Probably websrvr.c, but could be something else. I only vaguely recall some kind of problem with chunked transfers within the past few months; this may be unrelated. If your build is 2+ months old it might be worth updating to see if it helps.
So, now I have another weird problem - after DM fixed the earlier error with SBBS running inet_ntop, and it being not able to run under XP,
When I replaced my executables with the newest sbbs_dev from 9/1, sbbsecho.exe opens briefly, and closes after 1-2 seconds. I saw the following in error.log:
Sun Sep 1 07:27:52 2019
mail !Invalid temp directory: c:\sbbs\temp\
Sun Sep 1 07:27:52 2019
web !Invalid temp directory: c:\sbbs\temp\
Sun Sep 1 07:27:52 2019 realitycheckbbs.org
ftp Error 17 creating temp directory: c:\sbbs\temp\
Sun Sep 1 07:27:52 2019
srvc !Invalid temp directory: c:\sbbs\temp\
Sun Sep 1 07:28:05 2019
mail !Invalid temp directory: c:\sbbs\temp\
Sun Sep 1 07:28:05 2019
srvc !Invalid temp directory: c:\sbbs\temp\
Sun Sep 1 07:28:05 2019
web !Invalid temp directory: c:\sbbs\temp\
Sun Sep 1 07:28:05 2019 realitycheckbbs.org
ftp Error 17 creating temp directory: c:\sbbs\temp\
(I didn't have the temp directory set in SBBS.ini)
I tried running sfcg, and got the following error message:
Main configuration file (C:\sbbs\ctrl\main.cnf) missing!
But, it exists and I can list the file.
C:\sbbs\ctrl>dir main.cnf
Volume in drive C has no label.
Volume Serial Number is 749D-D921
Directory of C:\sbbs\ctrl
07/13/2019 01:11 PM 6,983 main.cnf
1 File(s) 6,983 bytes
0 Dir(s) 461,146,697,728 bytes free
C:\sbbs\ctrl>
I tried setting the temp variable in sbbs.ini to /sbbs/temp and c:\sbbs\temp, to no avail.
With no configuration changes, my binaries from June 2019 runs just fine - with the exception of the lag when loading web pages.
To: Digital Man
Terminator: Dark Fate will be released November 1, 2019.
It will be a sequel to Terminator 2: Judgement Day.
Is it possible that the user you're running sbbsctrl as has no access to that directory?
With no configuration changes, my binaries from June 2019 runs just fine
- with the exception of the lag when loading web pages.
That is weird. I can't think of any obvious explanation. Does sbbs.exe run?
Re: Re: New Terminator movie coming out
By: Digital Man to poindexter FORTRAN on Sun Sep 01 2019 01:24 pm
Is it possible that the user you're running sbbsctrl as has no access to that directory?
This is Windows XP, and logged into the same window as the user I could list the file directory contents and list the file.
With no configuration changes, my binaries from June 2019 runs just fine >> - with the exception of the lag when loading web pages.
That is weird. I can't think of any obvious explanation. Does sbbs.exe run?
With the old binaries, everything works fine. New binaries, running sbbsctrl.exe opens the window briefly, then it disappears.
Re: Re: New Terminator movie coming out02:52 am
By: Anonymous Remailer (austria) to alt.bbs.synchronet on Mon Sep 02 2019
please post under another name.
Terminator: Dark Fate will be released November 1, 2019.
It will be a sequel to Terminator 2: Judgement Day.
$ The Millionaire $
please post under another name.
have you forgotten what anonymous remailers are for? the only way to block t
is by IP or domain and that currently means a global block in the BBS' contr files which means that someone would need to get DM to block them... but yea you and most of the rest of us already know this ;)
Digital Man wrote to poindexter FORTRAN <=-
That is weird. I can't think of any obvious explanation. Does sbbs.exe run?
Digital Man wrote to poindexter FORTRAN <=-
That is weird. I can't think of any obvious explanation. Does sbbs.exe run?
I didn't know there *was* an sbbs.exe -- ran it and got the same results:
c:\sbbs>sbbs
Synchronet Console for Win32 Version 3.17c Copyright 2019 Rob Swindell
Reading C:\SBBS\CTRL\sbbs.ini
Loading configuration files from /sbbs/ctrl\
9/2 13:18:02 ftp Synchronet FTP Server Revision 1.494
9/2 13:18:02 srvc Synchronet Services Revision 1.331
9/2 13:18:02 term Synchronet Terminal Server Version 3.17 Revision C
9/2 13:18:02 ftp Compiled Sep 2 2019 05:04:01 with MSC 1922
9/2 13:18:02 srvc Compiled Sep 2 2019 05:04:29 with MSC 1922
9/2 13:18:02 mail Synchronet Mail Server Revision 1.713
9/2 13:18:02 term Compiled Sep 2 2019 05:03:01 with MSC 1922
9/2 13:18:02 ftp Initializing on Mon Sep 2 13:18:02 2019 with options: 11d 9/2 13:18:02 srvc Initializing on Mon Sep 2 13:18:02 2019 with options: 0 9/2 13:18:02 mail Compiled Sep 2 2019 05:04:13 with MSC 1922
9/2 13:18:02 web Synchronet Web Server Revision 1.698
9/2 13:18:02 term Initializing on Mon Sep 2 13:18:02 2019 with options: 1032 9/2 13:18:02 ftp Loading configuration files from /sbbs/ctrl\
9/2 13:18:02 srvc Loading configuration files from /sbbs/ctrl\
9/2 13:18:02 mail Initializing on Mon Sep 2 13:18:02 2019 with options: a8466 9/2 13:18:02 web Compiled Sep 2 2019 05:04:33 with MSC 1922
9/2 13:18:02 term Loading configuration files from /sbbs/ctrl\
9/2 13:18:02 mail Loading configuration files from /sbbs/ctrl\
9/2 13:18:02 web Initializing on Mon Sep 2 13:18:02 2019 with options: d0 9/2 13:18:02 ftp Error 17 creating temp directory: c:\sbbs\temp\
9/2 13:18:02 srvc !Invalid temp directory: c:\sbbs\temp\
9/2 13:18:02 web Loading configuration files from /sbbs/ctrl\
9/2 13:18:02 term Verifying/creating data directories
9/2 13:18:02 mail !Invalid temp directory: c:\sbbs\temp\
9/2 13:18:02 term !ERROR 17 (File exists) creating directory: c:\sbbs\data 9/2 13:18:02 web !Invalid temp directory: c:\sbbs\temp\
9/2 13:18:02 srvc #### Services thread terminated (0 clients served)
9/2 13:18:02 term !ERROR 17 (File exists) creating directory: c:\sbbs\data\sub 9/2 13:18:02 term !ERROR 17 (File exists) creating directory: c:\sbbs\data\dir 9/2 13:18:02 term !ERROR 17 (File exists) creating directory: c:\sbbs\data\tex 9/2 13:18:02 term !ERROR 17 (File exists) creating directory: c:\sbbs\data\msg 9/2 13:18:02 term !ERROR 17 (File exists) creating directory: c:\sbbs\data\use 9/2 13:18:03 term !ERROR 17 (File exists) creating directory: c:\sbbs\data\use ptrs
9/2 13:18:03 term !ERROR 17 (File exists) creating directory: c:\sbbs\data\qne 9/2 13:18:03 term !ERROR 17 (File exists) creating directory: c:\sbbs\data\fil 9/2 13:18:03 term !ERROR 17 (File exists) creating directory: c:\sbbs\data
With the old binaries, sbbs and sbbsctrl run just fine.
Digital Man wrote to Kurt Weiske <=-
Strange. I don't have any obvious explanation. Is it possible you have security software installed which is treating the 2 differen sets of executables (the "old binaries" and the new ones) differently?
Sysop: | sneaky |
---|---|
Location: | Ashburton,NZ |
Users: | 25 |
Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
Uptime: | 139:59:23 |
Calls: | 1,905 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 11,079 |
Messages: | 935,051 |