Hi All
I have rasberry pi Rasbian and i hope same one would would like to help me with installing unix sbbs please i not much good with unix but I would like to try.
Firstly does any one how if there is a how to do video of the installing
of it.
secondly I have been on wiki.synchro.net/install:nix and just having
a bit of troule following it
so this is my first step ie
---------------------------------------------------------------------------- You must create the directory where Synchronet will live. Some common locations would be your home directory (e.g. /home/you/sbbs) or the system root directory (e.g. /sbbs).
By default, Synchronet executables will look for files in the /sbbs/ctrl directory, so if you install Synchronet into a different directory you will need to either create a symbolic link in your root directory (e.g. ln -s /home/you/sbbs /) or set the SBBSCTRL environment variable accordingly
---------------------------------------------------------------------------- - And would like to now does this look right or not
drwxr-xr-x 23 root root 740 Oct 6 09:18 run
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 Oct 7 10:58 sbbs -> /home/pi/sbbs/
Hi All
I have rasberry pi Rasbian and i hope same one would would like to help me with installing unix sbbs please i not much good with unix but I would like to try.
Firstly does any one how if there is a how to do video of the installing
of it.
secondly I have been on wiki.synchro.net/install:nix and just having
a bit of troule following it
so this is my first step ie
drwxr-xr-x 23 root root 740 Oct 6 09:18 run
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 Oct 7 10:58 sbbs -> /home/pi/sbbs/
Hi All
I have rasberry pi Rasbian and i hope same one would would like to help me with installing unix sbbs please i not much good with unix but I would like to try.
On 10-07-18 21:38, Sneaky wrote to All <=-
And would like to now does this look right or not
drwxr-xr-x 23 root root 740 Oct 6 09:18 run
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 Oct 7 10:58 sbbs -> /home/pi/sbbs/
On 10-07-18 10:09, Mortifis wrote to Sneaky <=-
For me it seemed to work better installing sbbs to /sbbs as RELEASE=1 rather than SYSLINK=1
Doesn't RELEASE=1 install the older 3.16? (which is ancient). And I think
On 10-07-18 10:09, Mortifis wrote to Sneaky <=-
For me it seemed to work better installing sbbs to /sbbs as RELEASE=1 rather than SYSLINK=1
Doesn't RELEASE=1 install the older 3.16? (which is ancient).
And I think
you mean SYMLINK=1 in the above example. I got the development build installed easily by dropping the SYMLINK=1 parameter.
On 10-07-18 22:32, echicken wrote to Tony Langdon <=-
@TZ: 40f0
Re: Re: Rasberry Pi unix help with install
By: Tony Langdon to Mortifis on Mon Oct 08 2018 12:52:00
Doesn't RELEASE=1 install the older 3.16? (which is ancient). And I think
No, that would be more a matter of checking out the 3.16 tag from CVS. IIRC RELEASE=1 is the default/normal build, instead of DEBUG=1 for a
debug build.
On 10-07-18 19:42, Digital Man wrote to Tony Langdon <=-
No. "RELEASE" means a non-debug build of the same source code.
And I think
you mean SYMLINK=1 in the above example. I got the development build installed easily by dropping the SYMLINK=1 parameter.
Either way should work.
For me it seemed to work better installing sbbs to /sbbs as RELEASE=1
rather than SYSLINK=1
Doesn't RELEASE=1 install the older 3.16? (which is ancient). And I
think you mean SYMLINK=1 in the above example. I got the development build installed easily by dropping the SYMLINK=1 parameter.
On 10-07-18 10:09, Mortifis wrote to Sneaky <=-
For me it seemed to work better installing sbbs to /sbbs as RELEASE=1 rather than SYSLINK=1
Doesn't RELEASE=1 install the older 3.16? (which is ancient). And I think you mean SYMLINK=1 in the above example. I got the development build installed easily by dropping the SYMLINK=1 parameter.
On 10-08-18 05:39, mark lewis wrote to Tony Langdon <=-
max and i have been building 3.17 in RELEASE=1 or DEBUG=1 modes since
she decided to try to wade in a few years back... we've used SYMLINK=1 with both... my current install is /not/ using symlinks because of problems we ran into in the past on max's system when switching between release or debug... not that one will be doing that very often but i didn't want to deal with that bit of hassel when i decide to switch
from debug to release...
On 10-08-18 08:48, Mortifis wrote to Tony Langdon <=-
yes, SYSLINK was a typo ... I ran make RELEASE=1 and it compiled as
3.17a .. my understanding is that by using RELEASE=1 is telling the compiler to not include extra debugging info? One could just run make
max and i have been building 3.17 in RELEASE=1 or DEBUG=1 modes since
she decided to try to wade in a few years back... we've used
SYMLINK=1 with both... my current install is /not/ using symlinks
because of problems we ran into in the past on max's system when
switching between release or debug... not that one will be doing that
very often but i didn't want to deal with that bit of hassel when i
decide to switch from debug to release...
I went for no symlinks, while I had no issues with symlinks, I prefer
to have my binaries in the right place in the tree, in case I ever
have to move the source tree or remove it for some reason. And if I
ever have to replace binaries by hand, I didn't want to have to chase symlinks.
And DM, echicken and others cleared up my misinterpretation of
RELEASE. :)
On 10-09-18 21:18, mark lewis wrote to Tony Langdon <=-
yup! in the case i speak of, when switching between release and debug,
the make file stuff doesn't touch the symlink so it remains pointing at the wrong binary... copying the files into the tree doesn't have this problem but there is the (minor) additional drive space usage...
On 2018 Oct 09 06:58:00, you wrote to me:
max and i have been building 3.17 in RELEASE=1 or DEBUG=1 modes since
she decided to try to wade in a few years back... we've used
SYMLINK=1 with both... my current install is /not/ using symlinks
because of problems we ran into in the past on max's system when
switching between release or debug... not that one will be doing that
very often but i didn't want to deal with that bit of hassel when i
decide to switch from debug to release...
I went for no symlinks, while I had no issues with symlinks, I prefer to have my binaries in the right place in the tree, in case I ever
have to move the source tree or remove it for some reason. And if I ever have to replace binaries by hand, I didn't want to have to chase symlinks.
yup! in the case i speak of, when switching between release and debug, the make
file stuff doesn't touch the symlink so it remains pointing at the wrong binary...
yup! in the case i speak of, when switching between release and
debug, the make file stuff doesn't touch the symlink so it remains
pointing at the wrong binary... copying the files into the tree
doesn't have this problem but there is the (minor) additional drive
space usage...
Yeah, these days, that bit of disk usage is trivial. :)
yup! in the case i speak of, when switching between release and debug,
the make file stuff doesn't touch the symlink so it remains pointing at
the wrong binary...
Unless you run 'make symlinks'.
On 2018 Oct 09 20:42:56, you wrote to me:
yup! in the case i speak of, when switching between release and debug,
the make file stuff doesn't touch the symlink so it remains pointing at
the wrong binary...
Unless you run 'make symlinks'.
ahhh... that's one of the changes in the build process... mayhaps it was brought about by max's and my posting about our discovery with symlinks and switching between debug and build releases?
ahhh... that's one of the changes in the build process... mayhaps it
was brought about by max's and my posting about our discovery with
symlinks and switching between debug and build releases?
Perhaps but you weren't the only one(s) to have issues with that.
Anyway, not 'make install' will copy the binaries while 'make
symlinks' will create symlinks instead.
On 10-10-18 07:38, mark lewis wrote to Tony Langdon <=-
speaking of drive space, this recent move i had to make to another bbs package enabled me to increase the available drive space i have for the BBS... my old system was running on an 8Gig and a 20Gig drive... the 8
was split into 4 2g (OS limits when originally set up) and the 20 was split into 2 10g... now the whole thing is on one 40G VM drive...
pathing is a lot easier, too! :lol:
Hi All
I have rasberry pi Rasbian and i hope same one would would like to help me with installing unix sbbs please i not much good with unix but I would like to try.
Firstly does any one how if there is a how to do video of the installing of it.
I have an Image that you can burn to an SD card for the PI that has raspian installed as well as Synchronet 3.17 and Mystic.
you can Dload it at -> ftp://outwestbbs.com/raspberry.pi.re/RASPBERR/00index.html
I have text instructions on the desktop everything is preinstalled.
Re: Rasberry Pi unix help with install
By: Sneaky to All on Sun Oct 07 2018 09:38 pm
Hi All
I have rasberry pi Rasbian and i hope same one would would like to help me with installing unix sbbs please i not much good with unix but I would like to try.
Firstly does any one how if there is a how to do video of the installing of it.
I have an Image that you can burn to an SD card for the PI that has raspian installed as well as Synchronet 3.17 and Mystic.
you can Dload it at -> ftp://outwestbbs.com/raspberry.pi.re/RASPBERR/00index.html
I have text instructions on the desktop everything is preinstalled.
... Common sense is instinct. Enough of it is genius.
Re: Rasberry Pi unix help with install
By: Denn to Sneaky on Mon Oct 15 2018 00:09:38
Hi Denn
I have an Image that you can burn to an SD card for the PI that has raspian installed as well as Synchronet 3.17 and Mystic.
you can Dload it at -> ftp://outwestbbs.com/raspberry.pi.re/RASPBERR/00index.html
I have text instructions on the desktop everything is preinstalled.
Thank you for this image, its going to take a while to download
but I have plenty of time so that cool, and I will read the text instruction. and after I have either of them up and running I get back to you about it.
Hi Denn
I have an Image that you can burn to an SD card for the PI that has
Thank you for this image, its going to take a while to download
but I have plenty of time so that cool, and I will read the text instruction. and after I have either of them up and running I get back to you about it.
Re: Rasberry Pi unix help with install
By: Sneaky to Denn on Mon Oct 15 2018 10:05 pm
Hi Denn
I have an Image that you can burn to an SD card for the PI that has
Thank you for this image, its going to take a while to download
but I have plenty of time so that cool, and I will read the text instruction. and after I have either of them up and running I get back to you about it.
Sorry it's so big I need to figure out how to shrink the image to a resonable size.
I will try to figure that out next weekend.
You're a very helpful person, brah ... though, personally, I believe un*x is a 'get yer hands dirty' OS, that's why Windows still exists :-P
I have an Image that you can burn to an SD card for the PI that
has
You're a very helpful person, brah ... though, personally, I believe un*x is a 'get yer hands dirty' OS, that's why Windows still exists :-P
I ahve got the raspberr.zip downloaded and transfered to microsd and
tried on a rasb pi b+ would load but wanted to work, put it on
a rasb pi b and worked fine thank you (maybe a upgrade to work for b+)
but no probs it's working ok.
just 1 think though you set variable on boot up which is good
but when running sudo /sbbs/exec/scfg, it cames up but a error message cannot find ctrl/main.cnf missing so I cannot edit any setting,
tried a few things ie export SBBSCTRL=/sbbs/ctrl no difference
but the sudo /sbbs/exec/sbbs works fine, these are run in /sbbs
just letting you now and any help you can give me will be great
Thank you
On 10-16-18 23:23, Denn wrote to Mortifis <=-
I believe So many Linux Distro's confuse and frustrate most people,
I have tried many versions in the past and have settled on two Distro's that work well for what I do.
1.Ubuntu Mate is my favorite
2.Debian is my second choice.
Maybe one day there will be a mainstream Linux Distro that will take
out Windows.
Yes there is a learning curve to Linux if you want to take full
advantage of it's power but several Desktops will work for many un tech savvy people.
On 10-16-18 23:41, Denn wrote to Sneaky <=-
I never even considered if it might run on a PI B or B+
but the sudo /sbbs/exec/sbbs works fine, these are run in /sbbs
just letting you now and any help you can give me will be great
Thank you
I never even considered if it might run on a PI B or B+
When I did this Image I did it for th RPI 2 and RPI3 and tested it on both of those, and yes I made it so it
set up the variable on boot up for convenence.
Maybe one day there will be a mainstream Linux Distro that will take out Windows.
On 10-17-18 10:00, Nightfox wrote to Denn <=-
They've been saying that for years. Several Linux distros have tried (Ubuntu is one of the latest). I think there are some Linux distros
that potentially can right now. Linux Mint with the Cinnamon UI is currently one of my favorites.
that's cool, just letting you now, so if you pass it on to same one else they will now as well
set up the variable on boot up for convenence.
May I ask how and were you did this
Thank You
Maybe one day there will be a mainstream Linux Distro that will take
out Windows.
They've been saying that for years. Several Linux distros have tried (Ubuntu is one of the latest). I think there are some Linux distros that potentially can right now. Linux Mint with the Cinnamon UI is currently one of my favorites.
I have tried Mint but I prefer a lighter Distro, on my VPS I run LXDE and then add only the things I want to add.
Mint however is a great package for most people.
On 10-18-18 09:32, Nightfox wrote to Denn <=-
:) I thought Mint was fairly light, compared to my older favorite
distro SuSE (now OpenSUSE), which commonly came in a DVD ISO rather
than just a CD ISO.
set up the variable on boot up for convenence.
May I ask how and were you did this
Sysop: | sneaky |
---|---|
Location: | Ashburton,NZ |
Users: | 25 |
Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
Uptime: | 34:27:33 |
Calls: | 1,890 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 11,074 |
Messages: | 933,562 |