1. Forum
  2. Fidonet Message
  3. DBRIDGE

  • a small suggestion for future releases about mail size limit

    From ARNAUD DE BONALD@1:124/5013 to All on Thursday, January 31, 2019 20:10:38
    Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 09:00:12 -0400
    From: ARNAUD DE BONALD
    To: ALL
    Subject: a small suggestion for future releases about mail size limit Newsgroups: win.server.wish.list
    Message-ID: <1037801212.33.0@winserver.com>
    X-Mailer: Wildcat! Interactive Net Server v7.0.454.5
    Lines: 10

    Hello Hector & all,

    I would be nice if, in a future AUP, we could configure the maximum
    E-mail message size allowed pair access profile to be received or sent
    by an user.



    --------------------
    Arnaud de Bonald - Paris, France - Sysop Netcava BBS http://www.netcava.net
    --- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.1
    * Origin: Prison Board BBS Mesquite Tx //telnet.RDFIG.NET www. (1:124/5013)
  • From CHRIS CRANFORD@1:124/5013 to All on Thursday, January 31, 2019 20:10:38
    Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 09:38:28 -0400
    From: CHRIS CRANFORD
    To: ARNAUD DE BONALD
    Subject: Re: a small suggestion for future releases about mail size limit Newsgroups: win.server.wish.list
    Message-ID: <1037803538.33.1037801212@winserver.com>
    References: <1037801212.33.0@winserver.com>
    X-WcMsg-Attr: Rcvd
    X-Mailer: Wildcat! Interactive Net Server v7.0.454.5
    Lines: 20

    Most mail servers that I'm familiar with have this as a global option. Just out of curiousity, what would be the reasoning for having this available per security profile instead of a common global mail server option?

    Chris

    <ARNAUD DE BONALD> wrote in message news:1037801212.33.0@winserver.com...
    Hello Hector & all,

    I would be nice if, in a future AUP, we could configure the maximum
    E-mail message size allowed pair access profile to be received or sent
    by an user.



    --------------------
    Arnaud de Bonald - Paris, France - Sysop Netcava BBS
    http://www.netcava.net

    --- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.1
    * Origin: Prison Board BBS Mesquite Tx //telnet.RDFIG.NET www. (1:124/5013)
  • From HECTOR SANTOS@1:124/5013 to All on Thursday, January 31, 2019 20:10:38
    Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 10:44:19 -0400
    From: HECTOR SANTOS
    To: CHRIS CRANFORD
    Subject: Re: a small suggestion for future releases about mail size limit Newsgroups: win.server.wish.list
    Message-ID: <1037807290.33.1037803538@winserver.com>
    References: <1037803538.33.1037801212@winserver.com>
    X-WcMsg-Attr: Rcvd
    X-Mailer: Wildcat! Interactive Net Server v7.0.454.5
    Lines: 37

    Well, he has a point. For a subscription based system, you can allow X
    size for one type of subscription/security profile versus another.

    It was always part of the futures list as part of the big change when we finally move the message databases to support long file names and possibly
    an alternative storage system that would better support "size options" on a
    per user basis. Right now, it would be a major server overhead to do the same thing.

    ----


    <CHRIS CRANFORD> wrote in message news:1037803538.33.1037801212@winserver.com...
    Most mail servers that I'm familiar with have this as a global option.
    Just
    out of curiousity, what would be the reasoning for having this available
    per
    security profile instead of a common global mail server option?

    Chris

    <ARNAUD DE BONALD> wrote in message news:1037801212.33.0@winserver.com...
    Hello Hector & all,

    I would be nice if, in a future AUP, we could configure the maximum
    E-mail message size allowed pair access profile to be received or sent
    by an user.



    --------------------
    Arnaud de Bonald - Paris, France - Sysop Netcava BBS
    http://www.netcava.net



    * Origin: Prison Board BBS Mesquite Tx //telnet.RDFIG.NET www. (1:124/5013)
  • From BRIAN CAOUETTE@1:124/5013 to All on Thursday, January 31, 2019 20:10:38
    Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 22:53:18 -0400
    From: BRIAN CAOUETTE
    To: CHRIS CRANFORD
    Subject: Re: a small suggestion for future releases about mail size limit Newsgroups: win.server.wish.list
    Message-ID: <1037851185.33.1037803538@winserver.com>
    References: <1037803538.33.1037801212@winserver.com>
    X-WcMsg-Attr: Rcvd
    X-Mailer: Wildcat! Interactive Net Server v7.0.454.5
    Lines: 28

    Different access profiles could pay for a larger mailbox! :)

    <CHRIS CRANFORD> wrote in message news:1037803538.33.1037801212@winserver.com...
    Most mail servers that I'm familiar with have this as a global option.
    Just
    out of curiousity, what would be the reasoning for having this available
    per
    security profile instead of a common global mail server option?

    Chris

    <ARNAUD DE BONALD> wrote in message news:1037801212.33.0@winserver.com...
    Hello Hector & all,

    I would be nice if, in a future AUP, we could configure the maximum
    E-mail message size allowed pair access profile to be received or sent
    by an user.



    --------------------
    Arnaud de Bonald - Paris, France - Sysop Netcava BBS
    http://www.netcava.net



    --- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.1
    * Origin: Prison Board BBS Mesquite Tx //telnet.RDFIG.NET www. (1:124/5013)
  • From ARNAUD DE BONALD@1:124/5013 to All on Thursday, January 31, 2019 20:10:38
    Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 06:22:21 -0400
    From: ARNAUD DE BONALD
    To: CHRIS CRANFORD
    Subject: Re: a small suggestion for future releases about mail size limit Newsgroups: win.server.wish.list
    Message-ID: <1037878155.33.1037803538@winserver.com>
    References: <1037803538.33.1037801212@winserver.com>
    X-WcMsg-Attr: Rcvd
    X-Mailer: Wildcat! Interactive Net Server v7.0.454.5
    Lines: 16

    On Wed, 20 Nov 2002 09:38:28 -0500, CHRIS CRANFORD wrote:

    Most mail servers that I'm familiar with have this as a global option. Just >out of curiousity, what would be the reasoning for having this available per >security profile instead of a common global mail server option?

    because I have an automated verification / validation system
    (WS-Verify by Thomas Cloos)) and I don't want a bad joker to use my
    system as a big file sending / receiving service via mail.

    But for my own use, I eventually need to be able to send / receive big
    files via mail.


    --------------------
    Arnaud de Bonald - Paris, France - Sysop Netcava BBS http://www.netcava.net
    --- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.1
    * Origin: Prison Board BBS Mesquite Tx //telnet.RDFIG.NET www. (1:124/5013)