• 378 music, the real o

    From MICHAEL LOO@1:123/140 to NANCY BACKUS on Monday, May 13, 2019 14:17:28
    I hear about this cult breatharianism ... .
    The Pachelbel should qualify, as it has no
    substance whatever.
    Recently, my massage therapist Sharon had a "soothing" version of Kanon variations interspersed with ocean shore sounds going on the ipod in the room.... she'd had it on for the previous client, and I didn't tell her
    to turn it off (sometimes she needs the "soothing")... Afterwards, she admitted that two hours of the stuff was a bit too much... (G) And I

    Two minutes of the stuff is a bit much - that's about
    2/3 of the way through the piece.

    admitted that it was a bit much for me, too... and mentioned how much
    you would have "liked" it (a propos of our conversation here)... (G) Reminiscent to me of how little I like one playthrough of the Raveling Bolero, let alone multiple ones in sequence.... ;)

    Which leads one to ponder why ravel means both to
    tangle and to untangle. The Bolero ravels in the
    first sense as it gets bigger and bigger with more
    extraneous stuff, such as the catcalls toward the
    end. I'm at loose ends over this.

    Bum buddidy dum buddidy dum buddidyduddidyduddidy dumb.

    A pity. You could have said, okay, I'll play the
    Mouret or the Wagner or the Mendelssohn (all
    overused but not intrinsically worthless), but if
    you want the Pachelbel, you'll have to pay.
    They might have had to pay for the Wagner, actually... ;) Most of my siblings had higher tastes anyway... and some of them needed a bit of
    work to get to the proper level to sound good... ;)

    If they didn't pay you outright, I hope they
    were at least extra nice to you for a while.

    One could pretend to die of Fauxbourdon.
    Would one then hear the Voix Celeste....? Or only pretend to....?
    And be a diaphone-y?
    More likely a Diapaison... :)

    You know about the nervous guy walking around
    in circles - people said he'll diapason.

    Payment has not happened as of this writing.
    But you've done the gig... :)

    Payment was $300. Less than it's been, but I
    played an hour counting rehearsal and two shows.

    What usually spoils it for me is if one (or more) of the participants
    acts like they are too good for the rest of the group... puts the rest
    on edge so that it's harder to play well...
    It's true, it's true!
    [nodding solemnly] Yup...

    I told you about the lady who was an okay viola
    player but was married to a meek but less-than-okay
    violin player ... she would blame every little thing
    that went wrong on him and lash out at him in public
    despite the disasters being her fault maybe 20% of
    the time, i.e., she was not good enough to justify her
    high and mightiness. Then there was one of the big
    contractors in town, also married to a cellist of
    some meekness; invariably when they did a gig
    together, there would be a meltdown, and he'd hiss
    over to her something like, Ginny! ONE two three ONE
    two three - loud enough for people in the audience
    to notice sometimes. But in this case it was almost
    invariably his fault. The best defense is a good
    offense. Playing with these people was never a great
    pleasure.

    I'd get tired of the white keys in a jiffy but am not
    confident about my capacity to learn the black ones.
    It's true that Schoenberg said "there's still plenty
    of music to be written in C major," but even that
    doesn't imply that man can live on C major alone.
    When you get tired of just the white keys, one just slips in a black key
    or two, just to season the mix... ;)

    The door's not shut on my genius but I just
    don't have the time. - F&S, The Sloth

    made chili con carne sorbet. I've had chile-based
    frozen dishes, but not anything with that particular
    appealing combo of beef, onions, garlic, cumin, and
    dried capsicum powders that we know by that name.
    Could be an interesting concept.....

    But could it be made to taste good, that is the
    question. Whether it's better... oh, another post.

    I bought some generic Market Basket cheese doodles
    the other day. A couple handfuls of these and a
    full meal have proven to be well more than enough.
    I could see that... I tend to snack on different things than that, but
    that's about the right quantity... ;)

    I ODed on them next day, having no time to fix anything
    real, and they turned my poo orange.

    I'd go so far as to say on most things, yes.
    As long as it's not so open that the brains fall out. (G)
    I've heard that before. Never figured out what
    it meant.
    The idea that being too open-minded would make one stop thinking altogether... and quit being at all discerning...
    Which I think is a bit of a canard; open-mindedness
    to me is the antithesis of empty-mindedness.
    Perhaps some of us have seen empty-mindedness being touted as being open-minded a bit too often... A truly open mind can still reason, and
    hear what others say... And I've also seen those with closed minds that
    are probably pretty empty despite (or because?) of it... ;0

    Like people who are fooled into thinking that those who
    say a lot have a lot to say. Which leads others to counter
    that still waters run deep. Both of which may sometimes
    be true. Myself, I just roll into a ball and don't pay
    attention to anyone at all.

    Meatballs with Rice aka Hedgehogs
    categories: main
    servings: 8

    750 g ground meat
    300 g cooked rice (1.5 c)
    2 ts spices to taste
    1/2 ts garlic salt
    1/2 md onion, very finely minced

    Preheat oven to 375F.

    In a large bowl, mix together meat, rice,
    seasoning and very finely diced onion.
    Shape the mixture into little oval balls
    similar in size to small kiwi. Flatten
    them a little bit. Place on a baking sheet
    covered with parchment paper.

    Place the baking sheet into the oven and
    bake for 1 1/4 hr or until they are cooked
    through. Serve hot with tomato sauce.

    imagelicious.com
    --- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5
    * Origin: Fido Since 1991 | QWK by Web | BBS.FIDOSYSOP.ORG (1:123/140)
  • From NANCY BACKUS@1:123/140 to MICHAEL LOO on Saturday, May 18, 2019 08:29:00
    Quoting Michael Loo to Nancy Backus on 05-13-19 14:17 <=-

    Reminiscent to me of how little I like one playthrough of the Raveling Bolero, let alone multiple ones in sequence.... ;)
    Which leads one to ponder why ravel means both to
    tangle and to untangle. The Bolero ravels in the
    first sense as it gets bigger and bigger with more
    extraneous stuff, such as the catcalls toward the
    end. I'm at loose ends over this.

    My father first used the term... and I found it quite appropriate...
    picturing the article of clothing being pulled apart to its constituent threads, quite like my raveling sanity... (G)

    Bum buddidy dum buddidy dum buddidyduddidyduddidy dumb.

    Swat!!! Very dumb, indeed... Ruuup ruuup um ruuup ruuup um diddlydum.
    (The best part of the piece)

    A pity. You could have said, okay, I'll play the
    Mouret or the Wagner or the Mendelssohn (all
    overused but not intrinsically worthless), but if
    you want the Pachelbel, you'll have to pay.
    They might have had to pay for the Wagner, actually... ;) Most of my siblings had higher tastes anyway... and some of them needed a bit of
    work to get to the proper level to sound good... ;)
    If they didn't pay you outright, I hope they
    were at least extra nice to you for a while.

    Oh, generally... It WAS a wedding after all, with all on best
    behaviour... ;)

    One could pretend to die of Fauxbourdon.
    Would one then hear the Voix Celeste....? Or only pretend to....?
    And be a diaphone-y?
    More likely a Diapaison... :)
    You know about the nervous guy walking around
    in circles - people said he'll diapason.

    More Power to him.... ;)

    Payment has not happened as of this writing.
    But you've done the gig... :)
    Payment was $300. Less than it's been, but I
    played an hour counting rehearsal and two shows.

    Not too bad... :)

    What usually spoils it for me is if one (or more) of the participants acts like they are too good for the rest of the group... puts the rest
    on edge so that it's harder to play well...
    It's true, it's true!
    [nodding solemnly] Yup...
    I told you about the lady who was an okay viola
    player but was married to a meek but less-than-okay
    violin player ... she would blame every little thing
    that went wrong on him and lash out at him in public
    despite the disasters being her fault maybe 20% of
    the time, i.e., she was not good enough to justify her
    high and mightiness. Then there was one of the big
    contractors in town, also married to a cellist of
    some meekness; invariably when they did a gig
    together, there would be a meltdown, and he'd hiss
    over to her something like, Ginny! ONE two three ONE
    two three - loud enough for people in the audience
    to notice sometimes. But in this case it was almost
    invariably his fault. The best defense is a good
    offense. Playing with these people was never a great
    pleasure.

    What petty people... no I imagine it wouldn't be a pleasure... :(

    made chili con carne sorbet. I've had chile-based
    frozen dishes, but not anything with that particular
    appealing combo of beef, onions, garlic, cumin, and
    dried capsicum powders that we know by that name.
    Could be an interesting concept.....
    But could it be made to taste good, that is the
    question. Whether it's better... oh, another post.

    Back to Hamlet, are you...? (G)

    I bought some generic Market Basket cheese doodles
    the other day. A couple handfuls of these and a
    full meal have proven to be well more than enough.
    I could see that... I tend to snack on different things than that, but that's about the right quantity... ;)
    I ODed on them next day, having no time to fix anything
    real, and they turned my poo orange.

    How revolting... but expectable.... ;)

    I'd go so far as to say on most things, yes.
    As long as it's not so open that the brains fall out. (G)
    I've heard that before. Never figured out what
    it meant.
    The idea that being too open-minded would make one stop thinking altogether... and quit being at all discerning...
    Which I think is a bit of a canard; open-mindedness
    to me is the antithesis of empty-mindedness.
    Perhaps some of us have seen empty-mindedness being touted as being open-minded a bit too often... A truly open mind can still reason, and
    hear what others say... And I've also seen those with closed minds that
    are probably pretty empty despite (or because?) of it... ;0
    Like people who are fooled into thinking that those who
    say a lot have a lot to say. Which leads others to counter
    that still waters run deep. Both of which may sometimes
    be true. Myself, I just roll into a ball and don't pay
    attention to anyone at all.

    Sometimes a reasonable coping mechanism... (G)

    ttyl neb

    ... I finally found myself . . . now I don't know why!

    ___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.20
    --- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5
    * Origin: Fido Since 1991 | QWK by Web | BBS.FIDOSYSOP.ORG (1:123/140)