Choice between a rock and a hard place or the devil & the deep blue sea.Since computers can crunch numbers/data so much faster than peoplecan, > it makes sense to use them. As I understand, Watson (the
computer that > beat the all over top 2 Jeopardy players, is now used for medical
research/analysis.I've got a couple uneasinesses about that.
First, I have a similar suspicion with respect
to them that you have regarding seeing-eye
automation - lack of insight. and if they do
eventually get insight, that's scarier still.
The other issue is that computers are hackable.That's very scary, knowing that so much can be compromised so fast.
metrics. > ML> And then there are those of us who seldom measureIt's also half serious--whatever works best for you, go for it. Just
That was a joke.at all. It's amusing that someone who basically can'tIf it works for you, don't belittle your methodology.
see does most of his measuring by the eyeball method.
don't try to make something that calls for small, precise measurements
unless you know how much your "pinch" really is.
Though I'm pretty apprehensive about what happens toI'm not even going to think about the possible ramifications to the air travel industry.
the rest of the flying fleet if Boeing goes down.
Maybe it'll be reincarnated as a maintenance provider.
Do you think your wheel is squeaky enough to get the grease that willYeah, and there are lots of foods that qualify forBut take your ordinary wonderful, wholesome apple. ItClose enough to fat free to be labeled as such.
contains 0.3 grams of fat. That's not zero, but it may
be advertised as such, by the arcane rules.
the labeling that really aren't. It shouldn't be
this way.
change the whole food labelling industry?
Unless it's unwanted pounds.Can't win by losing, either.Among other things. Fat is also a major playerCan't win for losing.
in our basic metabolism. If you don't eat enough
of it, your body compensates in various ways,
including making it, and if you even so don't have
enough, you die.
Personal choice, probably. I'd say that adore would apply to animateIt's another word that is wrongly applied to food.The question arises what constitutes right and
wrong in this context. If there's such a thing.
objects (people, animals, etc) but inanamate objects (food, drink, etc)
would not be "adorable".
Not so many of those, actually.AFAIK, the Raleigh TSA does well in that regard. Every so often thenews > will have a story on "This is what the TSA confiscated in X months
locally".And then you get stories about "our reporter took a
hand grenade through security without being stopped."
Speaking of which, I was going out the security exitI'd agree with you there. It's been a while since we flew in/out of Sky Harbor--that was the one we'd use when we were in HI and our girls were (both) in AZ. Hawaiian had an overnight flight from Honolulu to Sky Harbor--very convenient for us.
at Phoenix when in my peripheral vision I noted
someone zip in the exit, which triggered an alarm.
I was glad to be leaving the airport rather than
trying to catch a flight.
IIRC, the cinnamon was in the recipe in my James Beard cook book. I'd probably use a teaspoon, maybe less, of it, just to play off theTo me, blueberries are delicate enough toRICH BLUEBERRY MUFFINSA couple of teaspoons of ground cinnamon makes them even better.
require that other distracting flavor be kept
out of the way.
blueberry taste.
now used > ML> for medicalcomputer that > beat the all over top 2 Jeopardy players, is
sea.Choice between a rock and a hard place or the devil & the deep blueresearch/analysis.I've got a couple uneasinesses about that.
First, I have a similar suspicion with respect
to them that you have regarding seeing-eye
automation - lack of insight. and if they do
eventually get insight, that's scarier still.
If you want to put it that way, yes.
The other issue is that computers are hackable.That's very scary, knowing that so much can be compromised so fast.
So I've always hated the idea of glass cockpits and
am thinking that airplane systems could be hacked to
amazing effect. This 737 Max thing is kind of getting
to me.
measure > ML> > ML> at all. It's amusing that someone who basically can'tmetrics. > ML> And then there are those of us who seldom
measurements > unless you know how much your "pinch" really is.It's also half serious--whatever works best for you, go for it. Just don't try to make something that calls for small, preciseThat was a joke.see does most of his measuring by the eyeball method.If it works for you, don't belittle your methodology.
Mine wasn't.
air > travel industry.Though I'm pretty apprehensive about what happens toI'm not even going to think about the possible ramifications to the
the rest of the flying fleet if Boeing goes down.
Maybe it'll be reincarnated as a maintenance provider.
It's kind of not so remote for me.
will > change the whole food labelling industry?Do you think your wheel is squeaky enough to get the grease thatYeah, and there are lots of foods that qualify forbe advertised as such, by the arcane rules.Close enough to fat free to be labeled as such.
the labeling that really aren't. It shouldn't be
this way.
My wheel isn't very squeaky, never was.
Unless it's unwanted pounds.Can't win by losing, either.of it, your body compensates in various ways,Can't win for losing.
including making it, and if you even so don't have
enough, you die.
Even so.
etc) > would not be "adorable".Personal choice, probably. I'd say that adore would apply to animate objects (people, animals, etc) but inanamate objects (food, drink,It's another word that is wrongly applied to food.The question arises what constitutes right and
wrong in this context. If there's such a thing.
The Catholics have even stricter criteria for
the term, going back to the etymology, which
is also why I'm disinclined to use it at all.
And then you get stories about "our reporter took aNot so many of those, actually.
hand grenade through security without being stopped."
The studies show that substantially more
contraband gets through than is caught. Not
customarily as big or threatening as a
grenade, but let's just say that we can
be thankful that the typical smuggler of
weapons is merely clueless rather than
malevolent.
Sky > Harbor--that was the one we'd use when we were in HI and ourSpeaking of which, I was going out the security exitI'd agree with you there. It's been a while since we flew in/out of
at Phoenix when in my peripheral vision I noted
someone zip in the exit, which triggered an alarm.
I was glad to be leaving the airport rather than
trying to catch a flight.
girls were > (both) in AZ. Hawaiian had an overnight flight from
Honolulu to Sky
Harbor--very convenient for us.
And it seems likewise that this particular
transgressor was not significantly dangerous.
better. > ML> To me, blueberries are delicate enough toRICH BLUEBERRY MUFFINSA couple of teaspoons of ground cinnamon makes them even
I'd > probably use a teaspoon, maybe less, of it, just to play off therequire that other distracting flavor be keptIIRC, the cinnamon was in the recipe in my James Beard cook book.
out of the way.
blueberry taste.
I'm very much a purist when it comes to
blueberries. Cranberries, not so much,
the sky's the limit.
Sysop: | sneaky |
---|---|
Location: | Ashburton,NZ |
Users: | 31 |
Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
Uptime: | 57:33:19 |
Calls: | 2,097 |
Files: | 11,143 |
Messages: | 950,220 |