I don't see the ownership of the woods beingState-owned land, federal land, private land etc all have different rules. If you're in a public park it's a different ball game than if you're on
relevant to the central issue, which I figure
is that of privacy. If there's a trespass issue,
your own property.
that's secondary, unless possibly the drones wereI wonder what the law would make of a trained hawk nailing the thing.
owned by the property owner. By the way, did you
know that unless you own the air rights to your
property, it may be illegal to shoot down an
intruding drone. It's not clear where your
jurisdiction ends and the FAA's begins, though.
Not on my part. I was of course an activeStop, in the name of science?
participant and furthermore staged reenactments
in the year after with no untoward effects.
Although one, staged at my friend Rosemary's
house, was respectfully requested to be done
outdoors, so the target was the stop sign on
the next corner.
MusiciansMusic critics, as best I can tell, are cut from the same cloth.
That makes me think it's how they became critics. It may be part of theand composers meanwhile, are another matter.By and large that appears to be true, but offhand
one name comes to mind - Nicolas Slonimsky. Also
to a lesser extent his pupil Joel Sheveloff. Both
did criticism as a sidelight, I admit.
job description.
That sounds slightly less lethal. Not more palatable, but less lethal.You will be glad to know that the stuff hasNo thanks; as someone with a lot of English ancestry it would probably poison me anyway.Green sangria sounds...painful.Just close your eyes and think of Ireland.
returned to its normal pineapple-yellow hue.
I've never let that question get in the way before....might be worth asking someone in another country.If anyone from another country chimes in, I'll
be happy; I'm not going out of my way to answer
the question "who wants to be an idiot?"
onIf you're in a public park it's a different ball game than if you're
your own property.
But all are secondary to privacy rights, if
the parties are equal (if it were government
actually doing the surveillance, that's
another issue altogether).
property, it may be illegal to shoot down anI wonder what the law would make of a trained hawk nailing the thing.
intruding drone. It's not clear where your
jurisdiction ends and the FAA's begins, though.
Same as a trained firearm.
outdoors, so the target was the stop sign onStop, in the name of science?
the next corner.
Before you break my olfactory apparatus.
theone name comes to mind - Nicolas Slonimsky. AlsoThat makes me think it's how they became critics. It may be part of
to a lesser extent his pupil Joel Sheveloff. Both
did criticism as a sidelight, I admit.
job description.
Though one has to think that the author of
"music that stinks to the ear" had to have
a bit of a perverse sense of humor.
lethal.You will be glad to know that the stuff hasThat sounds slightly less lethal. Not more palatable, but less
returned to its normal pineapple-yellow hue.
Didn't try either, though it's not clear
that either would have poisoned me at all.
be happy; I'm not going out of my way to answerI've never let that question get in the way before....
the question "who wants to be an idiot?"
Eh, one uses such when one has to.
Sysop: | sneaky |
---|---|
Location: | Ashburton,NZ |
Users: | 31 |
Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
Uptime: | 124:28:02 |
Calls: | 2,073 |
Files: | 11,135 |
Messages: | 947,386 |