• 69 taking, taking a pass was

    From MICHAEL LOO@1:123/140 to RUTH HAFFLY on Sunday, March 10, 2019 10:31:16
    I'm not going to speak for anyone but me and
    my closer friends, but for myself at least it's
    a pleasant, perhaps the only pleasant, state.
    I wouldn't say the only pleasant state, but a pleasant state.
    I've seldom seen fame do anyone any good.
    It's possible but unlikely that I'm harsher
    on it than the evidence dictates.
    Possible, but that's your opinion and I won't try to argue otherwise.

    In addition to being more anthropocentric
    than you, I'm also basically more puritanical
    than you, which probably doesn't jibe with
    our reputations.

    Hurrah - you must have a timeline in mind,
    either self-imposed or suggested by the
    physical therapist, right?
    Just progressing as she thinks I'm able. She upped the use of the cane
    to 50% yesterday so I went to my weekly check up using it. Doctor was a
    bit surprised since he'd not input on it but was pleased that I was
    using it. Home therapy ends this week, next week starts in clinic
    therapy.

    How far a drive is that?

    From what I've read, a lot of large sum lottery winners haven't
    known > how to handle that much money and have wound up bankrupt in a relatively > short amount of time. I've yet to play the game.
    Sometimes I think that's sour grapes talking,
    but there are numerous cases reported of the
    Midas touch being, well, the Midas touch.
    Be careful for what you wish situation.

    Of course, envy (whether of writers or readers)
    colors much of the news reports on lottery
    winners, but that seems to be pretty much the
    message we get.

    Interesting. The Van Doren of whom I spoke was
    Charles (son of a Pulitzer-winning Columbia
    professor), who was involved in a quiz-show
    cheating scandal in the 1950s (turns out most
    if not all such shows were rigged back then).
    I recall reading a bit about it. That's why Ken Jennings' record is so impressive now.

    Was there fallout in his life afterward?
    I wonder if people would recognize him on
    the street and ask stupid insoluble riddles
    and stuff.

    brought some cookies with us if we were going there for
    Christmas. > ML> Bleeding heart liberals!
    Now they're both quite conservative but would probably still supply their cousins with baked goodies. (G)
    That too was a joke, more or less.
    It's ironic because when she was younger, my sister did all the baking
    when my mom was in summer school. I did the other cooking; now I do
    both. (G)

    Luckily, both Lilli and Bonnie bake, and
    Rosemary has a decent cafe or two within
    walking distance.

    his health history or the circumstances of his death.
    Bertrand, of course, lived to 97.
    Just goes to show that you never know how factors like sugar, fat,
    salt > intake (or lack of intake) may affect health and longevity.
    What we were taught as universals turn out
    not to be.
    Very true--the standard white male, age 25-40 is not the standard any
    more.

    Never was, except among doctors.

    one set of cousins who spent time skirting the
    edges of ethics, but to the best of my understanding,
    they're within legal boundaries.
    Best not to cross that line.
    Easier for most, anyway.
    Overall, yes.

    "cerebral". Had
    some interesting discussions on that book, most of them pseudo-intellectual, looking back at them. (G)
    I found that book offensive nonsense from the
    word go, with something to offend everyone.
    It was not my favorite read.
    Well, for me pretty much no England English
    literature before the 20th century could be
    characterized as a favorite read.
    I did/do enjoy Dickens.

    I've heard that from people. Maybe he deserves
    another try, though I doubt it.

    Yep. And Southwest wins by doing the exact
    same thing as everyone else but getting the
    passengers to smile about it.
    Lucky them. (G)
    Perhaps willingly being milked is the ideal
    condition; I think not.
    Some people like that experience.
    Perhaps. Some like being beaten, too.
    Some, not all.

    Not everyone likes being cheated.

    I can understand why--all your records, etc are with another
    doctor > ML> and > you would have to explain everything to the new doctor. Been > ML> there, done > that, not fun.
    Someday I'll go back to Mass. Eye and Ear.
    And explain why you've not seen them for a while.
    Not going to bother with that part.
    Go thru the new patient routine?

    Nope. If they won't give me what I want
    when I need it, I'll go someplace that will.

    Ham balls
    1 sleeve crushed graham crackers
    ***************
    Is this right? I'd think that saltine crackers would be a more
    logical > choice.
    Saltines would make that already weird dish too
    salty to eat.
    OK, I'd maybe look into some other kind of cracker or cracker substitute then.

    Or perhaps refrain from making it, which would
    be my way of coping.

    This is perhaps a setting where you'd expect
    graham crakers ... but that also contains
    saltines.
    Title: Butterfinger Dessert *
    I'll pass, IIRC, butterfingers have peanut butter in them.

    So put Snickerses on top!

    Cake, Cream and Cherries
    categories: semi-homemade, desserts, Nullarbor
    yield: 1

    1 angel food cake
    2 pk Dream Whip
    8 oz cream cheese
    1 1/2 c powdered sugar
    1 cn cherry pie filling, chilled

    Slice cake into 3 layers. Mix Dream Whip packets
    according to directions. Whip cream cheese with
    powdered sugar, blend this with the Dream Whip
    and spread between the layers of the cake as well
    as on the top. Top with cherry pie filling.

    The cake must be kept refrigerated.

    Dyann Bobbitt, Woomera, SA
    --- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5
    * Origin: Fido Since 1991 | QWK by Web | BBS.FIDOSYSOP.ORG (1:123/140)
  • From Ruth Haffly@1:396/45.28 to MICHAEL LOO on Sunday, March 10, 2019 20:28:04
    Hi Michael,

    I'm not going to speak for anyone but me and
    my closer friends, but for myself at least it's
    a pleasant, perhaps the only pleasant, state.
    I wouldn't say the only pleasant state, but a pleasant state.
    I've seldom seen fame do anyone any good.
    It's possible but unlikely that I'm harsher
    on it than the evidence dictates.
    Possible, but that's your opinion and I won't try to argue
    otherwise.

    In addition to being more anthropocentric
    than you, I'm also basically more puritanical
    than you, which probably doesn't jibe with
    our reputations.

    Possibly but here's not the place to figure it out.

    Hurrah - you must have a timeline in mind,
    either self-imposed or suggested by the
    physical therapist, right?
    Just progressing as she thinks I'm able. She upped the use of the
    cane > to 50% yesterday so I went to my weekly check up using it.
    Doctor was a > bit surprised since he'd not input on it but was
    pleased that I was
    using it. Home therapy ends this week, next week starts in clinic therapy.

    How far a drive is that?

    About 3 or 4 miles, not that far. Same building as the doctor's office.
    Beats having to go down to Raleigh or over to Durham or Chapel Hill.

    From what I've read, a lot of large sum lottery winners
    haven't > ML> known > how to handle that much money and have wound up bankrupt in a > ML> relatively > short amount of time. I've yet to
    play the game.
    Sometimes I think that's sour grapes talking,
    but there are numerous cases reported of the
    Midas touch being, well, the Midas touch.
    Be careful for what you wish situation.

    Of course, envy (whether of writers or readers)
    colors much of the news reports on lottery
    winners, but that seems to be pretty much the
    message we get.

    AFAI'm concered, it's smomething not worth spending my money on. Some
    big game tickets are rather pricey, I think I saw that one was
    $20./ticket.

    Interesting. The Van Doren of whom I spoke was
    Charles (son of a Pulitzer-winning Columbia
    professor), who was involved in a quiz-show
    cheating scandal in the 1950s (turns out most
    if not all such shows were rigged back then).
    I recall reading a bit about it. That's why Ken Jennings' record is
    so > impressive now.

    Was there fallout in his life afterward?
    I wonder if people would recognize him on
    the street and ask stupid insoluble riddles
    and stuff.

    He's still recognisable but I don't know if he gets stupid questions or
    not.

    brought some cookies with us if we were going there
    for > ML> Christmas. > ML> Bleeding heart liberals!
    Now they're both quite conservative but would probably still
    supply > ML> > their cousins with baked goodies. (G)
    That too was a joke, more or less.
    It's ironic because when she was younger, my sister did all the
    baking > when my mom was in summer school. I did the other cooking;
    now I do
    both. (G)

    Luckily, both Lilli and Bonnie bake, and
    Rosemary has a decent cafe or two within
    walking distance.

    I don't do as much as I used to. Stephen is doing more now.

    his health history or the circumstances of his death. Bertrand, of course, lived to 97.
    Just goes to show that you never know how factors like sugar,
    fat, > ML> salt > intake (or lack of intake) may affect health and longevity. > ML> What we were taught as universals turn out
    not to be.
    Very true--the standard white male, age 25-40 is not the standard
    any > more.

    Never was, except among doctors.

    True, but they tried to make us believe that it was the standard we
    needed to measure up to.

    "cerebral". Had
    some interesting discussions on that book, most of
    them > ML> > ML> > pseudo-intellectual, looking back at them. (G)
    I found that book offensive nonsense from the
    word go, with something to offend everyone.
    It was not my favorite read.
    Well, for me pretty much no England English
    literature before the 20th century could be
    characterized as a favorite read.
    I did/do enjoy Dickens.

    I've heard that from people. Maybe he deserves
    another try, though I doubt it.

    Depends on what sort of reading you enjoy.

    Perhaps willingly being milked is the ideal
    condition; I think not.
    Some people like that experience.
    Perhaps. Some like being beaten, too.
    Some, not all.

    Not everyone likes being cheated.

    True.


    I can understand why--all your records, etc are with
    another > ML> doctor > ML> and > you would have to explain
    everything to the new > ML> doctor. Been > ML> there, done > that,
    not fun.
    Someday I'll go back to Mass. Eye and Ear.
    And explain why you've not seen them for a while.
    Not going to bother with that part.
    Go thru the new patient routine?

    Nope. If they won't give me what I want
    when I need it, I'll go someplace that will.

    Sounds fair, are they usually co-operative?

    Ham balls
    1 sleeve crushed graham crackers
    ***************
    Is this right? I'd think that saltine crackers would be a
    more > ML> logical > choice.
    Saltines would make that already weird dish too
    salty to eat.
    OK, I'd maybe look into some other kind of cracker or cracker
    substitute > then.

    Or perhaps refrain from making it, which would
    be my way of coping.

    Most likely mine also.

    This is perhaps a setting where you'd expect
    graham crakers ... but that also contains
    saltines.
    Title: Butterfinger Dessert *
    I'll pass, IIRC, butterfingers have peanut butter in them.

    So put Snickerses on top!

    I'd go for Milky Way bars.

    ---
    Catch you later,
    Ruth
    rchaffly{at}earthlink{dot}net FIDO 1:396/45.28


    ... A mind stretched by new ideas can never go back to its original size.

    --- PPoint 3.01
    * Origin: Sew! That's My Point (1:396/45.28)