• 27 travel was crusty etc

    From MICHAEL LOO@1:123/140 to RUTH HAFFLY on Friday, March 01, 2019 16:07:20
    there are all sorts of populations mixed in to
    confuse the scientists, it's entirely possible
    that newly noticed peoples have a higher incidence
    of the disease. It's also possible that it's
    grossly overstated by some would-be sufferers.
    Hard to know, probably a combination of factors is making it more "on
    the radar" of people today.

    Thing is that medical research heretofore has
    been egalitarian in the sense that the studied
    populations have been homogenized ("a study of
    1000 white males ...") so as to control the
    number of variables, but then the results are
    usually claimed applicable to the entire human
    race. One hopes that computers can be programmed
    to sort out threads more carefully, but knowing
    people somebody is going to add a stray negation
    or set of parentheses with virtually untraceable
    adverse effects to the conclusions.

    acquired in some sort of tropical area. It's just been in the last couple of decades or so that gluten intolerance has become as wide spread known as it has.
    I recall reading that, too, but it's likely to
    have involved two diseases called sprue with
    similar manifestations but different causes.
    I also recall another confounding factor, that
    being that the celiac disease had been claimed
    to arise after a patient's bout of dysentery.
    I think I recall reading something of a similar sort.

    So how did it get that name?
    False cognate, apparently. Gluten is merely
    the Latin word for glue or anything sticky,
    and it just so happens that the chemists
    borrowed the term to describe a protein
    complex with sticky characteristics. Western
    writing about Chinese cooking often uses the
    term glutinous, which is accurate as far as
    it goes, but a less pretentious and less
    ambiguous word would be just plain "sticky."
    OK, that sounds logical. It's been quite a few years since I had Latin
    and have forgotten just about all I used to know.

    Most of what I say without disclaimer has
    some sense to it, I think.

    Likely. Could have been worse, as in Wheatena.
    Mom and Dad tried that on us too, with the same reaction.
    And Wheatena came pre-rancidized.
    Nothing could help it, and the bit of sugar & milk we were allowed
    didn't even begin to make it taste better.

    It was always amazing to me that people didn't
    or didn't want to notice the oxidation of that
    supposed food. It's so rancid that it just
    has to be a carcinogen.

    So what was oregano doing in a pot shop in the first place?
    It was in the display cases. No sense wasting
    revenue-generating product for show.
    Could have been as a "don't buy this stuff" display also.

    Why would a pot shop have such a display?

    in > the future, just have to remember not to wear anything with metallic
    thread in addition to the implants.
    It's just arbitrary and if not altogether irrational
    marching to the tune of a different bandmaster.
    Seems that way--and reminds me I need to ask my ortho doctor about a
    card that may or may not be looked at. TSA has never looked at the card
    I got for the metal in my wrists and elbow.

    Best to have one, though, just in case.

    30-Min Vietnamese Caramel Pork Stir Fry
    categories: American, main, easy
    servings: 4

    1 lb pork tenderloin, cut into cubes
    - M says use a fattier cut
    1/4 ts salt
    1/4 ts pepper
    1 1/2 Tb toasted sesame oil
    1 sweet onion, diced
    2 ts grated fresh ginger
    4 garlic cloves, minced
    1 c low-sodium chicken stock
    1/4 c loosely packed brown sugar
    1 Tb low-sodium soy sauce
    2 ts cornstarch
    2 ts rice vinegar
    1/2 ts crushed red pepper flakes
    1/2 red pepper, thinly sliced
    1/2 hd napa cabbage, sliced
    1/4 c roasted peanuts, chopped
    1/2 c freshly torn cilantro
    1 lime, cut into wedges
    2 c cooked brown jasmine rice, for serving

    Heat a large wok or skillet over high heat. Season
    the pork with salt and pepper. Add the oil to the
    skillet and once it's hot, add the pork. Cook until
    seared and golden brown on all sides, 6 to 8 min.
    Remove the pork from the wok and place it aside in
    a bowl. Add the onion, ginger and garlic to the
    skillet, stirring to toss. Cook until slightly
    softened, about 5 min, stirring occasionally.

    In a bowl, whisk together the chicken stock, sugar,
    soy sauce, cornstarch, vinegar and pepper flakes.
    Pour it into the skillet and bring it to a boil.
    Reduce to a simmer and cook for 3 to 4 min. Add
    the pork and red pepper into the wok, tossing to
    coat and cook for another 2 min.

    Serve immediately over brown jasmine rice. Top
    with the cabbage, peanuts, cilantro and a spritz
    of lime.

    Jessica on howsweeteats.com after Cooking Light
    --- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5
    * Origin: Fido Since 1991 | QWK by Web | BBS.FIDOSYSOP.ORG (1:123/140)
  • From Ruth Haffly@1:396/45.28 to MICHAEL LOO on Saturday, March 02, 2019 16:08:09
    Hi Michael,

    there are all sorts of populations mixed in to
    confuse the scientists, it's entirely possible
    that newly noticed peoples have a higher incidence
    of the disease. It's also possible that it's
    grossly overstated by some would-be sufferers.
    Hard to know, probably a combination of factors is making it more
    "on > the radar" of people today.

    Thing is that medical research heretofore has
    been egalitarian in the sense that the studied
    populations have been homogenized ("a study of
    1000 white males ...") so as to control the
    number of variables, but then the results are
    usually claimed applicable to the entire human

    But not so, as they're finding out now. Even between men and women there
    are a good number of variables.

    race. One hopes that computers can be programmed
    to sort out threads more carefully, but knowing
    people somebody is going to add a stray negation
    or set of parentheses with virtually untraceable
    adverse effects to the conclusions.

    It happens.

    acquired in some sort of tropical area. It's just been in the
    last > ML> > couple of decades or so that gluten intolerance has
    become as wide > ML> > spread known as it has.
    I recall reading that, too, but it's likely to
    have involved two diseases called sprue with
    similar manifestations but different causes.
    I also recall another confounding factor, that
    being that the celiac disease had been claimed
    to arise after a patient's bout of dysentery.
    I think I recall reading something of a similar sort.

    And now, more than ever, on the forefront of the medical news. Can't
    hardly grocery shop without coming across "gluten free" labels on
    things that naturally have not gluten, all over the store. Used to be,
    fat free was the big thing but it was usurped, big time, by gluten free.

    So how did it get that name?
    False cognate, apparently. Gluten is merely
    the Latin word for glue or anything sticky,
    and it just so happens that the chemists
    borrowed the term to describe a protein
    complex with sticky characteristics. Western
    writing about Chinese cooking often uses the
    term glutinous, which is accurate as far as
    it goes, but a less pretentious and less
    ambiguous word would be just plain "sticky."
    OK, that sounds logical. It's been quite a few years since I had
    Latin > and have forgotten just about all I used to know.

    Most of what I say without disclaimer has
    some sense to it, I think.

    Somewhat so. (G)

    Likely. Could have been worse, as in Wheatena.
    Mom and Dad tried that on us too, with the same reaction.
    And Wheatena came pre-rancidized.
    Nothing could help it, and the bit of sugar & milk we were allowed didn't even begin to make it taste better.

    It was always amazing to me that people didn't
    or didn't want to notice the oxidation of that
    supposed food. It's so rancid that it just
    has to be a carcinogen.

    It just pure tasted bad, even when I didn't know what oxidation or
    rancid meant.

    So what was oregano doing in a pot shop in the first place?
    It was in the display cases. No sense wasting
    revenue-generating product for show.
    Could have been as a "don't buy this stuff" display also.

    Why would a pot shop have such a display?

    For those who's brains are so addled from smoking the stuff that they
    would buy anything that looks remotely like it. (G)

    in > the future, just have to remember not to wear anything
    with > ML> metallic
    thread in addition to the implants.
    It's just arbitrary and if not altogether irrational
    marching to the tune of a different bandmaster.
    Seems that way--and reminds me I need to ask my ortho doctor about a card that may or may not be looked at. TSA has never looked at the
    card > I got for the metal in my wrists and elbow.

    Best to have one, though, just in case.

    Yes, because I never know when I might need it.


    ---
    Catch you later,
    Ruth
    rchaffly{at}earthlink{dot}net FIDO 1:396/45.28


    ... Mind... Mind... Let's see, I had one of those around here someplace.

    --- PPoint 3.01
    * Origin: Sew! That's My Point (1:396/45.28)