• 739 extended travel was

    From MICHAEL LOO@1:123/140 to RUTH HAFFLY on Friday, December 28, 2018 19:53:52
    I'm thinking that it shouldn't be for the likes
    of you and me. All that sugar and starch might
    be okay for, well, I can't think of whom it
    might be good for, aside for those who would
    otherwise be starving.
    I don't eat it that often, and usually not a full serving if I do.

    I wonder whose clever idea it was to begin
    with, one of those benighted Kelloggses or
    Posts or someone like that.

    Puffed rice at least doesn't have added sugar,
    or at least much of it. Just because it could
    be used in place of Styrofoam packing doesn't
    mean it's bad.
    We put milk and sugar on it; it was inedible in any way, shape, form or fashion.

    Make rice crispy treats out of them.

    I'd still be dubious of what my parents had long term stored in the cellar. Within a few months, stuff would have been OK, but years.... would have been very questionable.
    Cans do have liners that are supposed to
    protect the contents for way longer than
    the year or two claimed by the labels.
    Newer cans are better than older ones; I'd hate to think of the age of
    some of the cans they had on the shelves.

    I admit lead-containing solder might be an
    issue then.

    i guess when they snarl back at you that
    can be disconcerting. When I was a freshman
    and fairly innocent, I was walking past an
    old disused part of the Common and saw rats
    the size of cats running around, which
    offended my sensibilities, so I threw a
    brick at one and just winged it, and I swear
    the thing stopped and laughed at me.
    And your response to that was............?

    What does one say to a rat?

    May have been a young teacher in her first assignment and not
    expecting > an answer like that.
    Possibly, or maybe a perpetually innocent one.
    I've no idea, and can't ask my mom.
    And in my case people who bring it up tend
    to be, shall we say, on a different wavelength
    from me.
    Usually the same here.
    I wonder what it is about many of us that
    makes us think that way. The other way, I mean.
    Another topic I'm not going to get into.

    OK, we made it to the 2007, 2008, 2010 picnics, then IIRC,
    2015-current. > We started with Fido in January, 1994, out in AZ.
    Moved from there to > HI in 2001, then to GA in 2006. After that move
    we were finally able to > attend Fido picnics.
    You had a good excuse before.
    Very much so. (G)

    Here's a recipe that contains an appropriate misprint.
    As in?

    As you could see, there were a bunch of misprints in that
    recipe. One of them, in a word immediately before a period,
    was a propos to our discussion.

    But would she go for a small one?
    I doubt it. The functions of a big dog and a
    small dog are largely different.
    Some small ones are dust mops on legs; others are nervous breakdowns on
    4 paws. Big ones are good for the "quick look, scare off the intruder"

    Not quite what I was referring to, which was
    more the dog as an extension of one's ego.

    but most of them are softies at heart. I wouldn't want to mess with some

    In my experience that's so, but I've met some
    vicious ones.

    breeds tho. Both of our dogs (cocker spaniel and bichon frise) were good sized (had the bichon when the girls were small) for the family when we
    had them. Both had good temperaments, a bit crazy tho. (G)

    Just so they didn't raise a ruckus too often.

    In many countries, it's a real hassle to
    get tap water in restaurants; in others,
    it's not a good idea in the first place.
    Very true; I remember an American friend in Germany asking for water, thinking she was going to get tap water and getting bottled water. Had
    to teach her the way to ask for tap, if that's what she really wanted,
    but told her the bottled was better over there.

    A lesson not too expensively learned. Couple
    Euro, maybe.

    True, even now a lot of clear liquids can be easily mistaken
    for > ML> water.
    All one really has to do is have some
    illness-causing bacterium or virus in
    it, and some trouble could be caused.
    Could be quite debilitating.
    Not what I would want, especially while away from home.

    And free advertising for them. But, I doubt I'll ever fly
    Alaska > ML> That's the virtue I was referring to.
    Still, probably won't catch on, industry wide.
    And why not. I have been given quantities of
    branded merchandise of marginal usefulness,
    from water bottles to USB storage sticks to
    pens and pencils to salt. Salt?!
    Salt? Who did that? Anyway, a company may try giving away water bottles,

    Lufthansa. Publicizing the Salzburg service,
    something like that.

    thinking that people would use them whenever flying. The average
    American mind set tho is to get/use something they can dispose of after consumption. The idea of having to schlep around a refillable water
    bottle is not something most American travellers wouldn't go for, IMO.

    It should be, though. The amount of plastic waste
    we are dumping into the ocean is frightening.

    Yes, every so often we will donate a bunch to a thrift store or
    similar > place. Same with insulated cups.
    Well, there you go.
    We can only keep/store/use so many. Keeping the most useable, passing on
    the ones we find less than ideal. Got some Contigo travel mugs a few
    months ago that have been quite good; passed on some others that weren't quite as good.

    I've not heard of that brand.

    I detest garment bags - more than wrinkles.
    Plus a garment bag itself would use up the
    carry-on allowance, so that would be pointless.
    True, so you live with the somewhat rumpled look.

    I can't see it, so who cares.

    Fish sticks were a standby, as are deep-fried
    vegetables (nothing said about regular vegetables)
    The latter (other than french fries) were never served at our
    house.
    Your loss!
    I know, but Dad didn't like them and Mom didn't know how to cook them.
    Have to take that into consideration. (G)

    Title: Raisin Fudge
    Different, don't think I've ever seen fudge with raisins. Have seen a
    lot of it with nuts but I prefer mine plain.

    How about this one?

    MMMMM----- Recipe via Meal-Master (tm) v7.07

    Title: Oatmeal Fudge
    Categories: Chocolate, Desserts
    Servings: 6

    1 Stick butter
    2 c Sugar
    1/2 c Milk
    Bring to boil and stir while
    -boiling for 3 min. exactly.
    Remove from burner and add:
    1/2 c Cocoa
    2 c Oatmeal
    1/2 c Coconut
    1/2 c Pecans
    1 ts Vanilla
    1 pn Of salt

    Mix quickly and spoon out onto wax paper.

    Make sure you get all of your ingredients together first because
    you
    must mix the second half of the stuff in as soon as you take the boiling
    mixture off the stove. It really is good and very sweet. I usually make
    just a half recipe.

    Happy cooking!

    Source unknown

    MMMMM
    --- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5
    * Origin: Fido Since 1991 | QWK by Web | BBS.FIDOSYSOP.ORG (1:123/140)
  • From Ruth Haffly@1:396/45.28 to MICHAEL LOO on Monday, December 31, 2018 18:04:41
    Hi Michael,

    I'm thinking that it shouldn't be for the likes
    of you and me. All that sugar and starch might
    be okay for, well, I can't think of whom it
    might be good for, aside for those who would
    otherwise be starving.
    I don't eat it that often, and usually not a full serving if I do.

    I wonder whose clever idea it was to begin
    with, one of those benighted Kelloggses or
    Posts or someone like that.

    Don't know but they've sure made a lot of money from it. The breakfast
    cereal industry didn't exist at one time but it is going big time now.
    Seems like there's a new one (sometimes just a remake or rebranding of
    an old one) out just about every week.

    Puffed rice at least doesn't have added sugar,
    or at least much of it. Just because it could
    be used in place of Styrofoam packing doesn't
    mean it's bad.
    We put milk and sugar on it; it was inedible in any way, shape, form
    or > fashion.

    Make rice crispy treats out of them.

    Can't with the puffed stuff, can with Ricke Krispies. The puffed stuff
    is more of a packing material.

    Cans do have liners that are supposed to
    protect the contents for way longer than
    the year or two claimed by the labels.
    Newer cans are better than older ones; I'd hate to think of the age
    of > some of the cans they had on the shelves.

    I admit lead-containing solder might be an
    issue then.

    Probably not the healthiest choice for you. (G)

    i guess when they snarl back at you that
    can be disconcerting. When I was a freshman
    and fairly innocent, I was walking past an
    old disused part of the Common and saw rats
    the size of cats running around, which
    offended my sensibilities, so I threw a
    brick at one and just winged it, and I swear
    the thing stopped and laughed at me.
    And your response to that was............?

    What does one say to a rat?

    Whatever crosses your mind, from "get out of here!" to "good day, but
    good bye" to "nice seeing you, but don't let me see you again" or
    similar. (G)


    And in my case people who bring it up tend
    to be, shall we say, on a different wavelength
    from me.
    Usually the same here.
    I wonder what it is about many of us that
    makes us think that way. The other way, I mean.
    Another topic I'm not going to get into.

    OK, we made it to the 2007, 2008, 2010 picnics, then IIRC,
    2015-current. > We started with Fido in January, 1994, out in
    AZ. > ML> Moved from there to > HI in 2001, then to GA in 2006. After that move > ML> we were finally able to > attend Fido picnics.
    You had a good excuse before.
    Very much so. (G)

    Here's a recipe that contains an appropriate misprint.
    As in?

    As you could see, there were a bunch of misprints in that
    recipe. One of them, in a word immediately before a period,
    was a propos to our discussion.

    OK, I didn't look at it too closely. We were visiting my in laws so I
    didn't take too much time with Fido. Home now.


    But would she go for a small one?
    I doubt it. The functions of a big dog and a
    small dog are largely different.
    Some small ones are dust mops on legs; others are nervous breakdowns
    on > 4 paws. Big ones are good for the "quick look, scare off the intruder"

    Not quite what I was referring to, which was
    more the dog as an extension of one's ego.

    That, too in some instances.


    but most of them are softies at heart. I wouldn't want to mess with
    some

    In my experience that's so, but I've met some
    vicious ones.

    breeds tho. Both of our dogs (cocker spaniel and bichon frise) were
    good > sized (had the bichon when the girls were small) for the family when we > had them. Both had good temperaments, a bit crazy tho. (G)

    Just so they didn't raise a ruckus too often.

    No, not ususally. But, we knew Sam was aging/beginning to lose his
    hearing when he didn't bark at the garbage truck as often as he did when
    we first got him.

    In many countries, it's a real hassle to
    get tap water in restaurants; in others,
    it's not a good idea in the first place.
    Very true; I remember an American friend in Germany asking for
    water, > thinking she was going to get tap water and getting bottled water. Had > to teach her the way to ask for tap, if that's what she really wanted, > but told her the bottled was better over there.

    A lesson not too expensively learned. Couple
    Euro, maybe.

    At that time it was DM.

    True, even now a lot of clear liquids can be easily
    mistaken > ML> for > ML> water.
    All one really has to do is have some
    illness-causing bacterium or virus in
    it, and some trouble could be caused.
    Could be quite debilitating.
    Not what I would want, especially while away from home.

    Rather nasty stuff.

    And free advertising for them. But, I doubt I'll ever
    fly > ML> Alaska > ML> That's the virtue I was referring to.
    Still, probably won't catch on, industry wide.
    And why not. I have been given quantities of
    branded merchandise of marginal usefulness,
    from water bottles to USB storage sticks to
    pens and pencils to salt. Salt?!
    Salt? Who did that? Anyway, a company may try giving away water
    bottles,

    Lufthansa. Publicizing the Salzburg service,
    something like that.

    Another bottle I'll never get then.

    thinking that people would use them whenever flying. The average American mind set tho is to get/use something they can dispose of
    after > consumption. The idea of having to schlep around a refillable water
    bottle is not something most American travellers wouldn't go for,
    IMO.

    It should be, though. The amount of plastic waste
    we are dumping into the ocean is frightening.

    True, it's scary. We recycle as much as we can; our recycle can is often
    fuller than the regular trash can.

    Yes, every so often we will donate a bunch to a thrift store
    or > ML> similar > place. Same with insulated cups.
    Well, there you go.
    We can only keep/store/use so many. Keeping the most useable,
    passing on > the ones we find less than ideal. Got some Contigo travel mugs a few
    months ago that have been quite good; passed on some others that
    weren't > quite as good.

    I've not heard of that brand.

    It seems to be a good one for water bottles, travel mugs, etc.


    CONTINUED IN NEXT MESSAGE <<

    ---
    Catch you later,
    Ruth
    rchaffly{at}earthlink{dot}net FIDO 1:396/45.28


    ... If you think you are confused now, wait until I explain it!

    --- PPoint 3.01
    * Origin: Sew! That's My Point (1:396/45.28)
  • From Ruth Haffly@1:396/45.28 to MICHAEL LOO on Monday, December 31, 2018 18:17:38
    Hi Michael,

    CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS MESSAGE <<

    I detest garment bags - more than wrinkles.
    Plus a garment bag itself would use up the
    carry-on allowance, so that would be pointless.
    True, so you live with the somewhat rumpled look.

    I can't see it, so who cares.

    As long as you're not on stage for a major presentation, you're OK to
    have a few wrinkles. (G)


    Fish sticks were a standby, as are deep-fried vegetables (nothing said about regular
    vegetables) > ML> > ML> > The latter (other than french fries) were never served at our > ML> house.
    Your loss!
    I know, but Dad didn't like them and Mom didn't know how to cook
    them. > Have to take that into consideration. (G)

    But, I turned out OK, in the long run. (G)


    Title: Raisin Fudge
    Different, don't think I've ever seen fudge with raisins. Have seen
    a > lot of it with nuts but I prefer mine plain.

    How about this one?


    Title: Oatmeal Fudge
    Categories: Chocolate, Desserts
    Servings: 6

    I think I'll pass on that--give me plain (or mint flavored) chocolate
    fudge with no nuts or other additives but for maybe more chocolate. (G)

    ---
    Catch you later,
    Ruth
    rchaffly{at}earthlink{dot}net FIDO 1:396/45.28


    ... Not all questions worth asking have answers...

    --- PPoint 3.01
    * Origin: Sew! That's My Point (1:396/45.28)