Quoting Dave Drum to Jim Weller <=-
Squirrel is not spectacularly tasty or different [...] They're
pretty bland .... like most rabbit, cat, woodchuck, raccoon
Wild hare is lean red meat, and tough if old, while domestic rabbit
is white meat.
Never eaten hare that I am aware of. Nor jack rabbit.
Rabbit raised for meat is generally raised like chicken --- and
tastes about as exciting.
JIM WELLER wrote to DAVE DRUM <=-
Squirrel is not spectacularly tasty or different [...] They're
pretty bland .... like most rabbit, cat, woodchuck, raccoon
I agree on rabbit and cat (I've only tasted lynx, never domestic
cats), even groundhog, although it's quite fatty, but I'm not sure
about raccoon. I've only had it once (they are not commonly hunted
let alone eaten in Ontario) and it was a long time ago but as I
recall it smelled kind of musky when it was getting skinned and gave
off an odoriferous aroma cooking but the cooked meat was tasty. It
was fairly greasy (I recall seeing a thick outer layer of white fat
under the skin) and had a look and taste kind of similar to turkey
dark meat. I wouldn't call it bland though, as in similar to young
chicken breast.
Wild hare is lean red meat, and tough if old, while domestic rabbit
is white meat.
Never eaten hare that I am aware of. Nor jack rabbit.
Rabbit raised for meat is generally raised like chicken --- and
tastes about as exciting.
Jack "rabbits" are actually hares and wild hares do have more
flavour than tame rabbits.
Sysop: | sneaky |
---|---|
Location: | Ashburton,NZ |
Users: | 31 |
Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
Uptime: | 19:56:48 |
Calls: | 2,095 |
Calls today: | 2 |
Files: | 11,142 |
Messages: | 949,519 |