Actually, in genealogy there was mostly content, and sometimes quite aTrue... it really was goal-driven, as we all were looking to hopefully
lot of it packed into a message... And there were a lot of people regularly posting... probably a couple hundred of regulars....
Seems that was a goal-driven echo; ours not so much.
find a cousin that had more info on the lines we were having trouble searching... and to exchange info with.... once contact was established, further info exchange was likely to be done in snail mail... :) And
newbies to the field needed to learn where and how to look... There was
a feeling of family there, too, so there were some messages that were
more personal than genealogical from time to time...
Seems that some previous moderators tried to keepThe larger the conference, the more things have to be more or less kept
the conference on the straight and narrow,
in line, lest things get too unwieldy.... and some focus is needed...
but with a smaller group, the focus is more likely to stray more... not necessarily a bad thing...
plus there were places such as Recipes and InternationalThey were useful to some subset, no doubt... Like the TAGLINES echo,
Cooking, the point of which always escaped me.
devoted just to tags... ;)
Exactly. One really does need to keep things in perspective... :)A good possibility... ;)
The question has been raised how many people actually
eat oysters, and my top-of-head answer would be probably
a lot more than go outside during thunderstorms.
Meanwhile making ourselves more vulnerable.... ;)You'd think. There's a balance between not spreading germs and
That's the rub, if you will. I've always been
hostile to the widespread use of antibacteriala;
didn't think much about alcohol, though until
recently. I always preferred high-percentage
propyl when I could get it, and now that 70%
appears to be the minimum reliable germkilling
concentration, that preference should become
more widespread.
encouraging the germs to evolve into being more resistant...
Quoting Michael Loo to Nancy Backus on 08-18-18 10:50 <=-
Actually, in genealogy there was mostly content, and sometimes quite a lot of it packed into a message... And there were a lot of people regularly posting... probably a couple hundred of regulars....True... it really was goal-driven, as we all were looking to hopefully
Seems that was a goal-driven echo; ours not so much.
find a cousin that had more info on the lines we were having trouble searching... and to exchange info with.... once contact was established, further info exchange was likely to be done in snail mail... :) And
See, ours is much more open-ended and without
an overarching goal - our goals are ephemeral;
problem is that without a critical mass, there's
going to be nobody to answer the occasional
questions that arise.
newbies to the field needed to learn where and how to look... There was
a feeling of family there, too, so there were some messages that were
more personal than genealogical from time to time...
We could do that sort of thing here, I guess.
Seems that some previous moderators tried to keepThe larger the conference, the more things have to be more or less kept
the conference on the straight and narrow,
in line, lest things get too unwieldy.... and some focus is needed...
It's not the unwieldy issue so much as the in
line for other reasons issue.
but with a smaller group, the focus is more likely to stray more... not necessarily a bad thing...
That's my more comfortable condition, anyway,
and I hope it's agreeable to the majority here.
plus there were places such as Recipes and InternationalThey were useful to some subset, no doubt... Like the TAGLINES echo,
Cooking, the point of which always escaped me.
devoted just to tags... ;)
I suppose, though the need diminishes as the
Internet fills in almost all its gaps, making
us more and more a purely social thing.
Meanwhile making ourselves more vulnerable.... ;)You'd think. There's a balance between not spreading germs and
That's the rub, if you will. I've always been
hostile to the widespread use of antibacteriala;
didn't think much about alcohol, though until
recently. I always preferred high-percentage
propyl when I could get it, and now that 70%
appears to be the minimum reliable germkilling
concentration, that preference should become
more widespread.
encouraging the germs to evolve into being more resistant...
The most effective way to kill germs, they now
say, is to squash them. So rinsing, with lots
of rubbing action, is important; antimicrobials
apparently less good for the purpose and you in
general.
Sysop: | sneaky |
---|---|
Location: | Ashburton,NZ |
Users: | 31 |
Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
Uptime: | 193:33:09 |
Calls: | 2,083 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 11,137 |
Messages: | 947,749 |