• Re: 783 more various & sh

    From NANCY BACKUS@1:123/140 to MICHAEL LOO on Monday, May 28, 2018 11:55:00
    Quoting Michael Loo to Nancy Backus on 05-23-18 09:19 <=-

    It's cut so far back in her department that she is
    the only one actually doing anything, this having
    been at one time one of the most important
    manufacturers of blood-processing equipment in the
    world.
    A similar story to Kodak's.... I hope she ends up ok...
    I've been encouraging her to look for another
    situation - she's honest, hard-working, and
    bright, so there has to be a job for her
    someplace.

    One would hope... :) As long as they don't count age and experience
    against her....

    was choose the old-fashioned pension option when given the choice to
    move to something more modern... And he also clarified that a lot of
    what we did wasn't done consciously, just the way we lived...
    An excellently self-preservational way of behaving.
    We grew up learning how to live on fairly little, and didn't change much from that... ;)
    Understood. I've seen much of the spectrum and can
    revert to the one end without pain. Some people,
    though, cannot.

    We've noticed that... particularly with people that had overextended
    themselves in the "good" years....

    Efficiency is not everything and amounts to
    cruelty in a lot of cases.
    Indeed... as in just about everything, there's a balance there...
    As far as I can tell, the proper balance is
    way farther from the efficiency side than the
    business schools would have you believe. Even if
    someone functions at, say, 1/10 efficiency, s/he
    should still be allowed to work, i.e., contribute
    to society in a small but meaningful way.
    Agreed. It's also an argument to keep the sheltered workshops open... giving people work to do that helps them feel as though what they do has meaning... A friend at church, now retired from one, was proudly telling that they used to make/assemble the tops for the reusable water
    bottles... maybe a small job, but it gave satisfaction to him...
    What has impressed me about the more socialistic
    or totalitarian economies is that - strangely -
    the people at the very low end of the spectrum
    are given meaning that those higher up may not
    have. Give your rubbish collector a spiffy hat
    and jacket and tell him he's a valued member of
    society, and you've saved one person. Capitalist
    societies have so far been not so great at that.

    They did come up with fancy titles like sanitation engineer, and such...
    not that I think that really changed much.... ;)

    With Wegmans, it somewhat depends on which store you are in... the one
    we shopped at for many years before they decided to close it catered to
    the more modest clientele, and had fewer of the high end options but
    more of the reasonable ones... But we've found that we don't do any
    better at any of the other places in our area... most either have much inferior products for not that much less, or are pricing things about
    the same as Wegmans...
    A clever shopper can do well at the lesser
    stores, even perhaps Tops. What Wegmans does
    is take the uncertainty out, but I still think
    at a not insubstantial monetary cost.

    Dunno... places like TOPS also pretend to greatness, and often charge accordingly, but what they have on offer falls short....

    For a while, Richard was taking one of our friends grocery shopping,
    mainly providing the transportation and the brawn... so he'd take her to
    the stores she wanted to go to... and when she fussed that this or that wasn't up to her standards, he'd look at it, agree it wasn't as good
    as it should be, and at least think to himself that it was more
    generally better at Wegmans... at one point, he finally mentioned that
    to her, and when they did go to a Wegmans, she agreed that it was much better, and for about the same price... Agreed that for brand names one might do a little better, especially when things are on sale, somewhere else, but even that hasn't always been the case here...
    On the whole, I'm pretty happy with Wegmans
    and hope it continues with its generally fair
    business practices.

    As do I.. :)

    I was pretty good at keeping the diet unskewed... not being too rigidly committed to only shopping sales... if something I wanted wasn't on sale anywhere, I still might get it... ;)
    The educated consumer can balance things; it is the
    less adept and those unfamiliar with the principles of
    home economics that one worries about.
    A lot of what I learned was by doing... not from being actively taught
    it... so I'd think that others should be able to at least pick up
    basics... Granted, I probably learned a fair bit by going with Daddy
    when I was growing up... And we've tried to educate others that we've
    taken shopping as well... including our son, when he went off to college
    and was finally ready to pay attention... (G)
    I was going to say, just because we can do
    it doesn't mean others can. I have a friend
    who is by no means dumb - Smith undergrad, two
    master's degrees - who is continually astonished
    when I can cook reasonably tasty dishes without
    consulting lots of references. She's flummoxed
    by such simplicities as "pint's a pound the world
    around" even without the revision for accuracy
    "pint's a pound the world around except when it
    isn't," which would cause too much tsouris
    altogether.

    True... it can be a bit astonishing how little some have managed to
    assimulate over the years, despite being reasonably intelligent... :)
    Of course, they'd have issues with even the better stores, and be easily
    taken in by the traps... ;0

    I've lately mostly had the experience of the older ones that have learned, along with younger ones that pay attention and listen... Unfortunately my older docs that I loved have retired, and at least one replacement isn't shaping up all that well...
    The obvious but somewhat inconvenient and possibly
    distressing solution is to shop for a new doc.
    Indeed. I have an appointment with that one's NP next week... I'm
    planning to explore what other options might be in that practice, but am also starting to think about checking around other places... lots of
    doctors to choose from, but I doubt that many will measure up to what
    I'm accustomed to now.... Definitely inconvenient, and, yes, to some extent, somewhat distressing...
    Latest wundernews is that my California doc has
    failed to call in my refills to the Massachusetts
    pharmacy. This points to a possibility of two
    weeks without the essential lifegiving meds. H'm.

    Oh dear.... Has that been properly resolved yet... that is not at all
    good...

    It's distressing, because on top of the known
    eyesight issues and the mild cataracts, there is
    something else going on that the doctors can't
    find (and so therefore it doesn't exist).
    Is it a brain issue...? They should check that, too... Also there's
    some less common things that lurk in the back of the eye to cause problems... I know Daddy ended up with something like that....
    I'm not ready for the neurologist yet but
    am reading oliver Sacks books.

    Any insights gleaned there....?

    ttyl neb

    ... I always wanted to be a procrastinator, but I kept putting it off...

    ___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.20
    --- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5
    * Origin: Fido Since 1991 | QWK by Web | BBS.DOCSPLACE.ORG (1:123/140)