I'm wondering the age a computer should be to be considered classic?
I tend to agree with the pre-core series. To me its not so much about age, but more about architecture changes. Which makes me wonder how long it would take to get to the next step. I feel even with the core series, you can still use modern operating systems, and can still use most software for a good period of time. I imagine the next leap is when dedicated AI hardware is integrated into our systems, and operation can be handled with AI, and I am not just talking about copilot with windows.I'm wondering the age a computer should be to be considered classic?
Ask 10 different people, you'll get 10 different answers.
For me, I'd say anything before Intel's Core I series CPUs, which puts it before 2009.
I have some desktops.
I'm wondering the age a computer should be to be considered classic?
Quoting Grant Weasner to All <=-
I have some desktops.
I'm wondering the age a computer should be to be considered classic?
I have what I consider to be a classic, it's a 386SX 16Mhz with 2
floppys and a hard drive. I also used to be an Amiga 1200 user, and
before that a Commodore 64 user. So I personally would consider any of
these as classics.
Other people, maybe not. Just depends on the viewpoint of the user.
Where does one draw the line? Something that's a nuisance to get up
and running? :)
I'm wondering the age a computer should be to be considered classic?Ask 10 different people, you'll get 10 different answers.
For me, I'd say anything before Intel's Core I series CPUs, which puts it before 2009.
alone "classic". 90s? Come and see me when you're on 70s kit!
Lately there has been a lot of interest in the classic/retro computers...
I enjoy reading about the variety of systems people still use today.
I have some desktops.
I'm wondering the age a computer should be to be considered classic?
Fernando Miculan wrote to Grant Weasner <=-
Hello Grant!
El viernes 04 de abril de 2025, Grant Weasner le escribi� a All:
I have some desktops.
I'm wondering the age a computer should be to be considered classic?
Umm... depend. 10 or 15 years old must be suficient, but classic
original is 286, 386 and 486. Is my opinion. :)
Quoting Bob Worm to Don Vally <=-
Yeah, I'm don't think there can be meaningful definition for
"classic". I BBS daily on a 1992 vintage Acorn computer - for the
average person that is *ancient* but I got jokingly retro-shamed the
other day on a C64 board for descrbing a 32 bit system with a mouse
and 800x600 graphics "retro" let alone "classic". 90s? Come and see me when you're on 70s kit!
Classics are in the mind's eye of each particular user. I have zero experience with anything computer related prior to 1981, so you have me
beat there. I have read some material on Data General minicomputers from
the 70's but I wouldn't consider them personal systems. Maybe an Altair?
Age should be less of a factor thaan archicecture. What of the 8086 mother boardss? Or the Motoroola 680?
I have some desktops.
I'm wondering the age a computer should be to be considered
classic?
Umm... depend. 10 or 15 years old must be suficient, but classicAge should be less of a factor thaan archicecture. What of the 8086
original is 286, 386 and 486. Is my opinion. :)
mother boardss? Or the Motoroola 680?
Bob Worm wrote to Sean Dennis <=-
Oh, I could bore you for hours about my Acorn :)
I have what I consider to be a classic, it's a 386SX 16Mhz with 2
floppys and a hard drive. I also used to be an Amiga 1200 user, and
before that a Commodore 64 user. So I personally would consider any of
these as classics.
Lately there has been a lot of interest in the classic/retro computers...
Absolutely. I first noticed it back when the The C-64 Maxi came out a two-three years ago. Since then I learned about various
hardware/software projects, emulators and, of course, BBSes. I currently have a Commander X16 (C-64/128 work-a-like) and and
N-Go
(ZX Specturm Go clone). I'm hoping a hardware Amiga clone comes along, that's my next target.
Hello Grant!
El viernes 04 de abril de 2025, Grant Weasner le escribi� a All:
I have some desktops.
I'm wondering the age a computer should be to be considered classic?
Umm... depend. 10 or 15 years old must be suficient, but classic original is 286, 386 and 486. Is my opinion. :)
I havent seen the momentum on X16 system for me to justify a purchase, or maybe its just because I rarely have the time for fun things.
In terms of retro and X16 being a new system, with a retro feel, I think the downside is that there isn't all the historical stuff for it that brings retro back to life.
Mortar, what are you doing with your X16? What creative visions do you see your X16 doing?
Thanks for sharing your love of Acorns. I do know that the British pop group Erasure still use a BBC computer
in their recording studio.
I think 8080, 8088, 268, 386, 486 are there. I was happy to hear that i568 core 1 is there, just because I have one of them :).
Mortar M. wrote to Dave Drum <=-
Re: age required for classic
By: Dave Drum to Fernando Miculan on Tue Apr 08 2025 04:50:43
Age should be less of a factor thaan archicecture. What of the 8086 mother boardss? Or the Motoroola 680?
You can't really sperate one without the other. After all, the 8086
and 6800 are from a specific time frame. --- SBBSecho 3.24-Linux
Fernando Miculan wrote to Dave Drum <=-
Hola Dave!
El martes 08 de abril de 2025, Dave Drum le escribi� a Fernando
Miculan:
I have some desktops.
I'm wondering the age a computer should be to be considered
classic?
Umm... depend. 10 or 15 years old must be suficient, but classicAge should be less of a factor thaan archicecture. What of the 8086
original is 286, 386 and 486. Is my opinion. :)
mother boardss? Or the Motoroola 680?
Very Old Classics. XD
Quoting Bob Worm to Don Vally <=-
Heha, I don't have you beat - my oldest computer is from 1984
according to the QA stickers (BBC micro).
The BBC is great for other things, though - ==> therefore classic
my book :)
Quoting Grant Weasner to Don Vally <=-
I think a 386sx is retro for sure.
I used to have a 386dx. That was really the computer that got
computing going for me.
It will be neat to see what the retro/classic computer scene thinks is platform to bring into the light.
Quoting Dave Drum to Fernando Miculan <=-
Of which I currently own ZERO. Since I made a rookie mistake and hot-swapped printer cables on my Amiga 4000. Fried the CIA chip ...
...;my first x86 series was an XT-Clone. A Packard Bell 4/8Mhz (Turbo-Wow!) CGA system. That was my first experience with x-86 architecture. I personally consider those models too - "un-uniform" to be fun to use. I know I may be in the minority, but you had to fight to get them to do what you wanted.
I did use an Apple IIE in the US Army in the very early 80's, it was
hooked to a laserdisk and was used for mapping purposes running dBase.
Are you in the UK?
So it's a 6502 system from your post, so I
guess maybe the equivalent of my C-64?
I think 8080, 8088, 268, 386, 486 are there. I was happy to hear that
i568 core 1 is there, just because I have one of them :).
My wife looked up the price of the motherboard for the Dell Optiplex
GMT 5133, and that alone was $179. I'm not trying to sell my old
gear,
but some day I'm sure she will have to deal with my pile of old
computers.
I really wish I had some of my old system, 8088, 386, 486, apple IIc.
The 386dx I had, I upgraded to the 486, so really I had the case of
the 386dx with a 486 in it.
Sysop: | sneaky |
---|---|
Location: | Ashburton,NZ |
Users: | 25 |
Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
Uptime: | 116:26:44 |
Calls: | 1,903 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 11,079 |
Messages: | 934,609 |